The influence of wood hardness and logging operation on coupling forces exerted by lumberjacks during wood harvesting

Abstract Petrol chain saws commonly used in forestry cause mechanical vibration, which may lead to the development of non-specific disorders in upper extremities of the chain saw operator, referred to as hand-arm vibration syndrome (HAVS). Progress of HAVS depends on the intensity of mechanical vibration transmitted throughout the body, which is directly proportional to coupling forces applied to the vibration tool. The aim of the study was to measure coupling forces exerted by lumberjacks on chain saws and find correlation between force magnitude, hardness of cut wood and kind of logging operation. Coupling forces exerted by workers with right and left hands were measured by means of hydro-electronic force meter. All measurements were done during harvesting wood in real work conditions. Maximal temporary forces exerted by woodcutters reached 275 N. The smallest average forces of 27 N were registered while limbing. During felling and cross-cutting chain saw operators exerted larger forces, reaching 50 N. The findings of this study suggest that coupling forces used by woodcutters during logging depend on wood hardness and kind of logging operation. Relevance to industry This study shows the relationship between coupling forces, wood hardness and technique of cut which are further expected to enhance our knowledge on the assessment of vibration exposure. Nowadays, understanding how changes in harvesting technique affect the magnitude of coupling force, should lead to improvements in ergonomic design of the tool and the workplace.

[1]  Subhash Rakheja,et al.  Influence of hand–arm posture on biodynamic response of the human hand–arm exposed to zh-axis vibration , 2006 .

[2]  D. E. Welcome,et al.  Evaluation of psychometric estimates of vibratory hand-tool grip and push forces , 2006 .

[3]  Ren G Dong,et al.  Frequency weightings based on biodynamics of fingers-hand-arm system. , 2005, Industrial health.

[4]  Ren G Dong,et al.  Estimation of biodynamic forces distributed on the fingers and the palm exposed to vibration. , 2005, Industrial health.

[5]  Subhash Rakheja,et al.  Vibration transmissibility characteristics of the human hand–arm system under different postures, hand forces and excitation levels , 2010 .

[6]  Robert G. Radwin,et al.  A new method for extending the range of conductive polymer sensors for contact force , 1996 .

[7]  Robert G. Radwin,et al.  Power hand tool vibration effects on grip exertions , 1987 .

[8]  A. Shibata,et al.  Smoking habits among senior high school students and related factors. , 1990, The Kurume medical journal.

[9]  D. E. Welcome,et al.  An investigation on the relationship between grip, push and contact forces applied to a tool handle , 2004 .

[10]  S Riedel Consideration of grip and push forces for the assessment of vibration exposure. , 1995, Central European journal of public health.

[11]  Minna Päivinen,et al.  The effects of different hand tool blade coatings on force demands when cutting wood , 2003 .

[12]  J. Hyvärinen,et al.  Transmission of vibration in the hand-arm system with special reference to changes in compression force and acceleration. , 1976, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[13]  I. Pyykkö,et al.  Hand-grip force in lumberjacks: two-year follow-up , 1986, International archives of occupational and environmental health.

[14]  H Dupuis,et al.  Effects of grip and push forces on the acute response of the hand-arm system under vibrating conditions , 1993, International archives of occupational and environmental health.

[15]  Lorenzo Scalise,et al.  A New Method for the Experimental Assessment of Finger Haemodynamic Effects Induced by a Hydraulic Breaker in Operative Conditions , 2004, Journal of occupational health.