Laterality Effects in Visual Information Processing: Hemispheric Specialisation or the Orienting of Attention?*

The notion that visual laterality patterns may be attributable to attentional allocation rather than hemispheric specialisation was examined in three experiments. In Experiment I, high verbal ability subjects were found to be less lateralised on a letter name match task than low verbals. In Experiment II, stimulus probability was shown to affect laterality patterns for name but not for physical matches. Again, low verbals were affected more than highs. Experiment III produced results identical to those of Experiment II although, in the latter experiment, visual fields were defined vertically rather than horizontally from the midline. Together, these results support the following generalisations: (1) visual asymmetries have their locus in a post-perceptual information processing stage; (2) visual asymmetries may be altered by manipulating stimulus probability; (3) verbal ability differences in laterality may not reflect neuroanatomical differences but merely cognitive capacity and (4) it may be unnecessary to invoke differential hemispheric specialisation in order to account for visual lateral asymmetries.

[1]  G. McConkie,et al.  Asymmetry of the perceptual span in reading , 1976 .

[2]  M. Posner,et al.  Retention of visual and name codes of single letters. , 1969, Journal of experimental psychology.

[3]  R. Goldberg,et al.  Individual differences in cognitive processes. , 1977, Journal of educational psychology.

[4]  J L Bradshaw,et al.  Hemispheric asymmetry: verbal and spatial encoding of visual stimuli. , 1972, Journal of experimental psychology.

[5]  Michael S. Gazzaniga,et al.  Interhemispheric relationships: the neocortical commissures; syndromes of hemisphere disconnection , 1969 .

[6]  G. Cohen Hemispheric differences in serial versus parallel precessing. , 1973, Journal of experimental psychology.

[7]  S. Schwartz,et al.  Individual differences in cognition: Relationship between verbal ability and memory for order , 1978 .

[8]  S. F. Witelson Developmental dyslexia: two right hemispheres and none left. , 1977, Science.

[9]  J. Jonides Left and Right Visual Field Superiority for Letter Classification , 1979, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[10]  M Moscovitch,et al.  Material-specific perceptual interference for visual words and faces: implications for models of capacity limitations, attention, and laterality. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[11]  M C Corballis,et al.  Laterality and myth. , 1980, The American psychologist.

[12]  M. Kinsbourne The cerebral basis of lateral asymmetries in attention. , 1970, Acta psychologica.

[13]  K. Kirsner Hemisphere-specific processes in letter matching. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[14]  Michael I. Posner,et al.  14 Attention and the Control of Movements , 1980 .

[15]  W. McKeever Does Post-Exposural Directional Scanning Offer a Sufficient Explanation for Lateral Differences in Tachistoscopic Recognition? , 1974, Perceptual and motor skills.

[16]  G. Cohen Comment on "Information processing in the cerebral hemispheres: selective activation and capacity limitations" by Hellige, Cox, and Litvac. , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[17]  H. Griffith,et al.  Long-term changes in intellect and behaviour after hemispherectomy , 1966 .

[18]  D. Butler,et al.  The effect of set size on hemifield asymmetries in letter recognition , 1980, Brain and Language.

[19]  M. White Does Cerebral Dominance Offer a Sufficient Explanation for Laterality Differences in Tachistoscopic Recognition? , 1973, Perceptual and motor skills.

[20]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[21]  P. Fahey,et al.  Lateral diffusion in planar lipid bilayers. , 1977, Science.

[22]  R. Treiman,et al.  Some problems in the study of differences in cognitive processes , 1980, Memory & cognition.

[23]  C. Berlin 17 – Hemispheric Asymmetry in Auditory Tasks , 1977 .

[24]  Joe L. Lewis,et al.  What does it mean to be high verbal? , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[25]  Howard S. Bashinski,et al.  Enhancement of perceptual sensitivity as the result of selectively attending to spatial locations , 1980, Perception & psychophysics.

[26]  J L Bradshaw,et al.  Differential hemispheric mediation of nonverbal visual stimuli. , 1975, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[27]  J. Miller Cognitive influences on perceptual processing. , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[28]  M. Dennis,et al.  Language acquisition following hemidecortication: Linguistic superiority of the left over the right hemisphere , 1976, Brain and Language.

[29]  C. Umilta,et al.  Hemispheric asymmetries in a letter classification task with different typefaces , 1980, Brain and Language.

[30]  J B Hellige,et al.  Information processing in the cerebral hemispheres: selective hemispheric activation and capacity limitations. , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[31]  J. Hellige Hemispheric processing differences revealed by differential conditioning and reaction time performance. , 1975, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[32]  E. Hunt Mechanics of Verbal Ability. , 1978 .

[33]  D. Kimura Dual functional asymmetry of the brain in visual perception , 1966 .

[34]  H. Hannay,et al.  Individual Differences and Asymmetry Effects in Memory for Unfamiliar Faces , 1979, Cortex.

[35]  M. White,et al.  Laterality differences in perception: a review. , 1969, Psychological bulletin.

[36]  W. McKeever Lateral Word Recognition: Effects of Unilateral and Bilateral Presentation, Asynchrony of Bilateral Presentation, and Forced Order of Report , 1971, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[37]  Robert G. Pachella,et al.  Stimulus probability and same-different classification , 1976 .

[38]  S. P. Springer,et al.  Hemispheric specialization for speech in language-disordered children , 1977, Neuropsychologia.

[39]  W. Heron,et al.  Perception as a function of retinal locus and attention. , 1957, The American journal of psychology.

[40]  E. Maccoby,et al.  The Psychology of Sex Differences , 1974 .

[41]  Keith E. Stanovich,et al.  Encoding, stimulus-response compatibility, and stages of processing , 1977 .

[42]  J L Bradshaw,et al.  Interhemispheric effects on reaction time to verbal and nonverbal visual stimuli. , 1971, Journal of experimental psychology.

[43]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Can lateral asymmetries in attention explain interfield differences in visual perception? , 1974, Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior.

[44]  Eran Zaidel,et al.  Auditory Vocabulary of the Right Hemisphere Following Brain Bisection or Hemidecortication , 1976, Cortex.

[45]  Gillian Cohen,et al.  Hemispheric differences in a letter classification task , 1972 .

[46]  R. Fudin,et al.  Hemispheric Factors and Scanning Dynamics in the Processing of Briefly Exposed Stimuli by Human Subjects: Bibliography , 1975, Perceptual and motor skills.

[47]  J. Schmuller Stimulus repetition in studies of laterality , 1980, Brain and Language.

[48]  C. Colbourn Can laterality be measured? , 1978, Neuropsychologia.