Radical prostatectomy with preservation of sexual function: Anatomical and pathological considerations

The technique for radical retropubic prostatectomy has been modified to avoid injury to the branches of the pelvic plexus that innervate the corpora cavernosa. The surgical procedure is based on an understanding of the anatomical relationships between the branches of the pelvic plexus that innervate the corpora cavernosa, the capsular branches of the prostatic vessels that provide the scaffolding for these nerves, and the lateral pelvic fascia. The modifications involve two steps in the procedure: 1) the incision in the lateral pelvic fascia is placed anterior to the neurovascular bundle, which is located dorsolateral to the prostate along the pelvic sidewall; 2) the lateral pedicle is divided close to the prostate to avoid injury to the branches of the pelvic plexus that accompany the capsular vessels of the prostate. Pathologic evaluation of 16 prostatic specimens removed by this modified procedure demonstrated no compromise in the adequacy of the surgical margins. Postoperative sexual function was evaluated in 12 men who underwent the procedure 2‐10 months previously. All have experienced erections and six have achieved successful vaginal penetration and orgasm. Of the six patients with sexual partners who have been followed 6 months or longer, five (83%) are fully potent. These data indicate that it is possible to cure localized prostatic cancer with surgery and maintain postoperative sexual function.

[1]  K. Cummings,et al.  Total prostatectomy for stage B carcinoma of the prostate. , 1977, The Journal of urology.

[2]  R. Flocks The Arterial Distribution Within The Prostate Gland: Its RôLe In Transurethral Prostatic Resection , 1937 .

[3]  W. Bradley,et al.  Snap-gauge band: new concept in measuring penile rigidity. , 1983, Urology.

[4]  A. L. Finkle,et al.  Encouraging preservation of sexual function postprostatectomy. , 1975, Urology.

[5]  J. Lattimer,et al.  Radical retropubic prostatectomy for cancer: a 20-year experience. , 1977, The Journal of urology.

[6]  P. Walsh,et al.  An anatomical approach to the surgical management of the dorsal vein and Santorini's plexus during radical retropubic surgery. , 1979, The Journal of urology.

[7]  A. Middleton Pelvic lymphadenectomy with modified radical retropubic prostatectomy as a single operation: technique used and results in 50 consecutive cases. , 1981, The Journal of urology.

[8]  B. Gunterberg,et al.  Sexual function after major resections of the sacrum with bilateral or unilateral sacrifice of sacral nerves. , 1976, Fertility and sterility.

[9]  G. Gray,et al.  The palpable nodule of prostatic cancer. Results 15 years after radical excision. , 1968, JAMA.

[10]  J. Eggleston,et al.  Radical prostatectomy in the management of carcinoma of the prostate: probable causes of some therapeutic failures. , 1972, The Journal of urology.

[11]  A. L. Finkle,et al.  Sexual potency after radical prostatectomy. , 1981, The Journal of urology.

[12]  Clegg Ej The arterial supply of the human prostate and seminal vesicles. , 1955 .

[13]  R. Scott,et al.  Radical retropubic prostatectomy in the treatment of prostatic carcinoma. , 1970, The Journal of urology.

[14]  E. Crawford,et al.  Radical retropubic prostatectomy. , 1983, The Journal of urology.