Efficacy and Tolerability of Nonprescription Ibuprofen versus Celecoxib for Dental Pain

Many clinicians appear confused about the purported clinical advantages of the new generation COX‐2 inhibitors compared to both over‐the‐counter and prescription nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory analgesic agents (NSAIDs). In fact, there is a paucity of published information comparing the safety and efficacy of these two classes of drugs when used to treat acute pain. This study was designed to compare the safety and analgesic efficacy of an over‐the‐counter (OTC) analgesic, ibuprofen (Advil Liqui‐Gels®), to the leading prescription COX‐2 inhibitor celecoxib (Celebrex®). Ibuprofen liquigel is an encapsulated, solubilized potassium salt of ibuprofen that has a higher Cmax and shorter tmax than traditional ibuprofen solid‐dosage formulations. This trial evaluated the maximum approved OTC dosing regimen (400 mg × 3, q4‐6h) of ibuprofen liquigels compared to a single dose of celecoxib (200 mg) and placebo in 174 patients with moderate or severe pain following surgical extraction of impacted third molars. The study design was multiple dose, randomized (stratified by baseline pain and gender), placebo controlled, double blind, double dummy, and parallel group. The onset of pain relief was determined using a two‐stopwatch procedure. Treatments were also compared using standard indices of pain intensity and pain relief. The study demonstrated assay sensitivity in that both active medications were significantly more effective than placebo for all efficacy measures. In comparing the two active medications, the time to meaningful relief was significantly shorter, and the mean 4‐, 8‐, and 12‐ hour summed pain relief combined with pain intensity difference scores were significantly higher for ibuprofen liquigels compared with celecoxib (p < 0.001). Analyses of other key efficacy variables, including the time to rescue medication and the patients' overall assessment of study medication, confirmed the superior efficacy of ibuprofen liquigels over celecoxib. Both active treatments were well tolerated, with no differences in incidence or severity of adverse events. Of particular interest, there were no differences in gastrointestinal‐related side effects when comparing these doses of ibuprofen liquigels to celecoxib. In conclusion, ibuprofen liquigels were a significantly more effective analgesic and provided relief significantly faster compared with celecoxib in the treatment of postsurgical pain.

[1]  W. Yuan,et al.  The optimal analgesic dose of rofecoxib: Overview of six randomized controlled trials. , 2000, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[2]  R Day,et al.  Comparison of upper gastrointestinal toxicity of rofecoxib and naproxen in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. VIGOR Study Group. , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  R. Makuch,et al.  Gastrointestinal toxicity with celecoxib vs nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis: the CLASS study: A randomized controlled trial. Celecoxib Long-term Arthritis Safety Study. , 2000, JAMA.

[4]  S. Jayawardena,et al.  Solubilized Ibuprofen: Evaluation of Onset, Relief, and Safety of a Novel Formulation in the Treatment of Episodic Tension‐type Headache , 2000, Headache.

[5]  Lise,et al.  Comparison of upper gastrointestinal toxicity of rofecoxib and naproxen in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. VIGOR Study Group. , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.

[6]  S. Daniels,et al.  Comparison of rofecoxib and celecoxib, two cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors, in postoperative dental pain: a randomized, placebo- and active-comparator-controlled clinical trial. , 1999, Clinical therapeutics.

[7]  Doyle,et al.  Gastrointestinal safety and tolerance of ibuprofen at maximum over‐the‐counter dose , 1999, Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics.

[8]  M. Feldman,et al.  Cyclooxygenase-1 and cyclooxygenase-2 selectivity of widely used nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. , 1998, The American journal of medicine.

[9]  A Nattestad,et al.  Analgesic Dose‐Response Relationship of Ibuprofen 50, 100, 200, and 400 mg after Surgical Removal of Third Molars: A Single‐Dose, Randomized, Placebo‐Controlled, and Double‐Blind Study of 304 Patients , 1998, Journal of clinical pharmacology.

[10]  M. Rawlins,et al.  Risks of bleeding peptic ulcer associated with individual non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs , 1994, The Lancet.

[11]  H. Jick,et al.  Risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding and perforation associated with Individual non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs , 1994, The Lancet.

[12]  D. Henry,et al.  Variability in the risk of major gastrointestinal complications from nonaspirin nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. , 1993, Gastroenterology.

[13]  J. Waksman,et al.  Nonprescription Ibuprofen: Side Effect Profile , 1992, Pharmacotherapy.

[14]  S. Cooper,et al.  A model to evaluate mild analgesics in oral surgery outpatients , 1976, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.