Performance Factors Analysis of a Wavelet-based Watermarking Method

The essential performance metrics of a robust watermark include robustness, imperceptibility, watermark capacity and security. In addition, computational cost is important for practicality. Wavelet-based image watermarking methods exploit the frequency information and spatial information of the transformed data in multiple resolutions to gain robustness. Although the Human Visual System (HVS) model offers imperceptibility in wavelet-based watermarking, it suffers high computational cost. In this paper, we examine embedding strength determined by a HVS model, a constant, and a simplified technique. The proposed simplified embedding technique significantly reduces embedding time while preserving the performance of imperceptibility and robustness. The fast embedding technique exploits implicit features of discrete wavelet transform (DWT) sub-bands, i.e. the luminosity information in the low pass band, and the edge information in the high pass bands. It achieves embedding speed comparable to a constant energy embedding process. Robustness is demonstrated with a few conventional attacks, e.g. JPEG compression, Gaussian noise insertion, image cropping, contrast adjustment, median filtering, and global geometrical distortion. Experimental visual quality is measured in Weighted-Peak Signal to Noise Ratio (W-PSNR) for high accuracy. Robustness and imperceptibility of HVS-based embedding could be trade-off with computational simplicity of a fast embedding technique.

[1]  Deepa Kundur,et al.  Digital watermarking using multiresolution wavelet decomposition , 1998, Proceedings of the 1998 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, ICASSP '98 (Cat. No.98CH36181).

[2]  Héctor M. Pérez Meana,et al.  Analysis of a wavelet-based watermarking algorithm , 2004, 14th International Conference on Electronics, Communications and Computers, 2004. CONIELECOMP 2004..

[3]  D. Kundur,et al.  A Robust Digital Image Watermarking Scheme Using the Wavelet-Based Fusion , 1997 .

[4]  Edward J. Delp,et al.  Perceptual watermarks for digital images and video , 1999, Electronic Imaging.

[5]  Mohammad Eyadat Factors that affect the performance of the DCT-block based image watermarking algorithms , 2004, International Conference on Information Technology: Coding and Computing, 2004. Proceedings. ITCC 2004..

[6]  Thierry Pun,et al.  Optimized wavelet domain watermark embedding strategy using linear programming , 2000, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[7]  Jiri Fridrich Secure Encryption and Hiding of Intelligence Data. , 1998 .

[8]  Bernd Girod,et al.  Spread spectrum watermarking: malicious attacks and counterattacks , 1999, Electronic Imaging.

[9]  Thierry Pun,et al.  Attack modelling: towards a second generation watermarking benchmark , 2001, Signal Process..

[10]  José María Martínez Sanchez,et al.  Robust digital image watermarking using DWT, DFT and quality based average , 2001, MULTIMEDIA '01.

[11]  Ingemar J. Cox,et al.  Secure spread spectrum watermarking for multimedia , 1997, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[12]  Adrian S. Lewis,et al.  Image compression using the 2-D wavelet transform , 1992, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[13]  John D. Villasenor,et al.  Visibility of wavelet quantization noise , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[14]  Deepa Kundur,et al.  A robust digital image watermarking method using wavelet-based fusion , 1997, Proceedings of International Conference on Image Processing.

[15]  Mauro Barni,et al.  Improved wavelet-based watermarking through pixel-wise masking , 2001, IEEE Trans. Image Process..