Predicting gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN): is urine hCG the answer?

BACKGROUND Previous studies on the significance of hCG to predict gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN) have been too small for robust conclusions to be reached. Our aim in this study was to analyse the significance of urine hCG in predicting GTN in a large population. METHODS Details of 3926 patients were available for analysis. Information regarding age, dates of diagnosis and registration, urine hCG levels, antecedent pregnancy and chemotherapy were prospectively collected and used for analyses. Patients were stratified into different groups according to urine hCG level (IU/L); < 50, 50-99, 100-249, 250-499, 500-999, 1000-9999 and ≥10,000. Multivariate analyses were used to identify the prognostic indicators of GTN. RESULTS Urine hCG and antecedent pregnancy were the most powerful indicators for developing GTN (P<0.01). None of the patients with partial mole and urine hCG <50 IU/L (Normal level=40 IU/L) developed GTN. The risk of GTN was >35% in all patients with urine hCG ≥500 IU/L. GTN developed in 70% of patients with complete mole and urine hCG ≥10,000 IU/L. CONCLUSION Urine hCG is sensitive test for GTN. Urine hCG level is a powerful prognostic indicator for the GTN. Patients with partial mole could be safely discharged from the surveillance programme once their hCG have normalised. Patients with urine hCG ≥249 IU/L, whether partial or complete molar pregnancy, appear to benefit from intensive surveillance. Prophylactic chemotherapy could be considered when there are problems with surveillance.

[1]  R. Berkowitz,et al.  Gestational trophoblastic disease , 1995, Cancer.

[2]  R. Berkowitz,et al.  Low Risk of Relapse After Achieving Undetectable hCG Levels in Women With Partial Molar Pregnancy , 2004, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[3]  K. Riazi,et al.  Is normal β‐hCG regression curve helpful in the diagnosis of persistent trophoblastic disease? , 2004, International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society.

[4]  M. Seckl,et al.  Choriocarcinoma and partial hydatidiform moles , 2000, The Lancet.

[5]  R. Berkowitz,et al.  Natural History of Partial Molar Pregnancy , 1985, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[6]  K. Bagshawe,et al.  HYDATIDIFORM MOLE IN ENGLAND AND WALES 1973-83 , 1986, The Lancet.

[7]  N. Sebire,et al.  Shortened duration of human chorionic gonadotrophin surveillance following complete or partial hydatidiform mole: evidence for revised protocol of a UK regional trophoblastic disease unit , 2007, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[8]  Gautam G. Rao,et al.  Duration of human chorionic gonadotropin surveillance for partial hydatidiform moles. , 2005, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[9]  F. Paradinas The histological diagnosis of hydatidiform moles , 1994 .

[10]  M. Quinn,et al.  Persistent trophoblast disease following partial molar pregnancy , 2006, The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology.

[11]  J. Schlaerth,et al.  Prognostic Characteristics of Serum Human Chorionic Gonadotropin Titer Regression Following Molar Pregnancy , 1981, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[12]  F. Sweep,et al.  Recurrent gestational trophoblastic disease after hCG normalization following hydatidiform mole in The Netherlands. , 2007, Gynecologic oncology.

[13]  C. Sweep,et al.  Early identification of persistent trophoblastic disease with serum hCG concentration ratios , 2007, International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer.

[14]  J. Tidy,et al.  Gestational trophoblastic disease: is intensive follow up essential in all women? , 2004, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[15]  T. Kaku,et al.  Identification of persistent trophoblastic diseases based on a human chorionic gonadotropin regression curve by means of a stepwise piecewise linear regression analysis after the evacuation of uneventful moles. , 1998, Gynecologic oncology.

[16]  J. Szepesi,et al.  How long should patients be followed after molar pregnancy? Analysis of serum hCG follow-up data. , 2004, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.