Small foveal targets for studies of accommodation and the Stiles–Crawford effect

The properties of small monochromatic targets as accommodative stimuli are not well understood. We used a dynamic optometer to record accommodation responses to monochromatic disc targets (1.0-27.3 min arc) and to a Maltese cross. Accommodation responded adequately to points as small as 13.6 min arc. The response to these small targets is relevant to the question of whether the Stiles-Crawford (SC) effect could provide a stimulus to accommodation. Previous studies have used pupil apodizing filters to neutralise the natural SC function and so determine how visual performance or accommodation is influenced by the SC effect. However, these filters cannot correct for known inhomogeneities in the SC function across the retina for extended targets. Therefore, we calculated the SC function inhomogeneities across the retinal image of a smaller 13.6-min arc target. Unfortunately, even this small target is too large to permit a homogenous SC function across its extent. Alternatives to the apodizing filter approach are discussed.

[1]  Philip B. Kruger,et al.  Accommodation Without Higher Order Monochromatic Aberrations , 2002 .

[2]  R. J. Miller Ocular vergence-induced accommodation and its relation to dark focus , 1980, Perception & psychophysics.

[3]  D. Williams,et al.  Visual consequences of the foveal pit. , 1980, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[4]  J M Enoch,et al.  Optical modulation by the isolated human fovea. , 1972, Vision research.

[5]  J M ENOCH,et al.  Amblyopia and the Stiles-Crawford effect. , 1957, American journal of optometry and archives of American Academy of Optometry.

[6]  G WESTHEIMER,et al.  Factors influencing accommodation responses of the human eye. , 1959, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[7]  G Westheimer,et al.  The Maxwellian view. , 1966, Vision research.

[8]  D A Atchison,et al.  Description of a method for neutralising the Stiles–Crawford effect , 2001, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[9]  W. N. Charman,et al.  Visual sensitivity to temporal change in focus and its relevance to the accommodation response , 1988, Vision Research.

[10]  A Duane,et al.  Studies in Monocular and Binocular Accommodation, with Their Clinical Application. , 1922, Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society.

[11]  G. M. Hope,et al.  Directional sensitivity of the foveal and parafoveal retina. , 1973, Investigative ophthalmology.

[12]  Austin Roorda,et al.  Monochromatic aberrations provide an odd-error cue to focus direction. , 2002, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[13]  Simulating Refractive Errors: Source and Observer Methods , 1985, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[14]  R. Carpenter,et al.  Movements of the Eyes , 1978 .

[15]  E F FINCHAM,et al.  The Accommodation Reflex and its Stimulus * , 1951, The Journal of physiology.

[16]  Jay M. Enoch,et al.  On voluntary ocular accommodation , 1975 .

[17]  R A Applegate,et al.  Parametric representation of Stiles-Crawford functions: normal variation of peak location and directionality. , 1993, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[18]  Philip B. Kruger,et al.  Chromatic aberration and ocular focus: Fincham revisited , 1993, Vision Research.

[19]  G. Westheimer Dependence of the magnitude of the Stiles—Crawford effect on retinal location , 1967, The Journal of physiology.

[20]  W. Rushton,et al.  Stiles—Crawford effect and the bleaching of cone pigments , 1971, The Journal of physiology.

[21]  J. Enoch The current status of receptor amblyopia , 1967, Documenta Ophthalmologica.

[22]  W. Stiles,et al.  The Luminous Efficiency of Rays Entering the Eye Pupil at Different Points , 1933 .

[23]  G. M. Hope,et al.  An analysis of retinal receptor orientation. 3. Results of initial psychophysical tests. , 1972, Investigative ophthalmology.

[24]  Philip B. Kruger,et al.  Accommodation without feedback suggests directional signals specify ocular focus , 1997, Vision Research.

[25]  P B Kruger,et al.  Infrared recording retinoscope for monitoring accomodation. , 1979, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[26]  J M Enoch,et al.  Monocular Spatial Distortions Induced by Marked Accommodation , 1973, Science.

[27]  S. Coren An instrument to produce surface colors of continuously variable brightness , 1970 .

[28]  W N Charman,et al.  Fluctuations in accommodation: a review , 1988, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[29]  Jay M. Enoch,et al.  Shift in the peak of the photopic Stiles-Crawford function with marked accommodation , 1975, Vision Research.

[30]  An analysis of retinal receptor orientation. IV. Center of the entrance pupil and the center of convergence of orientation and directional sensitivity. , 1972, Investigative ophthalmology.

[31]  D A Atchison,et al.  Subject instructions and methods of target presentation in accommodation research. , 1994, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[32]  Pablo Artal,et al.  Adaptive-Optics Correction of Asymmetric Aberrations Degrades Accommodation Responses , 2002 .

[33]  B Gilmartin,et al.  Tonic accommodation: a review. II. Accommodative adaptation and clinical aspects , 1994, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[34]  J M Enoch,et al.  MARKED ACCOMMODATION, RETINAL STRETCH, MONOCULAR SPACE PERCEPTION AND RETINAL RECEPTOR ORIENTATION * , 1975, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[35]  Philip B. Kruger,et al.  Spatiotemporal transfer function of human accommodation , 1994, Vision Research.

[36]  A. Laties,et al.  An analysis of retinal receptor orientation. I. Angular relationship of neighboring photoreceptors. , 1971, Investigative ophthalmology.

[37]  J. Gentle,et al.  Randomization and Monte Carlo Methods in Biology. , 1990 .

[38]  Lawrence Stark,et al.  Blur: A sufficient accommodative stimulus , 1977, Documenta Ophthalmologica.

[39]  W. Makous A transient Stiles-Crawford effect. , 1968, Vision research.

[40]  Vision Research , 1961, Nature.

[41]  F. Delori,et al.  A reflectometric technique for assessing photorecelptor alignment , 1995, Vision Research.

[42]  L. Stark,et al.  Accommodation and the Stiles–Crawford effect: theory and a case study , 2001, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[43]  Defects of the colour‐sense mechanism as indicated by the accommodation reflex , 1953, The Journal of physiology.

[44]  R. Greenberg Biometry , 1969, The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine.

[45]  Philip B. Kruger,et al.  Accommodation responds to changing contrast of long, middle and short spectral-waveband components of the retinal image , 1995, Vision Research.

[46]  D. Williams,et al.  Monochromatic aberrations of the human eye in a large population. , 2001, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[47]  F. Campbell,et al.  The minimum quantity of light required to elicit the accommodation reflex in man , 1954, The Journal of physiology.

[48]  J. C. Kotulak,et al.  The Accommodative Response to Subthreshold Blur and to Perceptual Fading during the Troxler Phenomenon , 1986, Perception.

[49]  M J ALLEN,et al.  The stimulus to accommodation. , 1955, American journal of optometry and archives of American Academy of Optometry.

[50]  D. Macleod,et al.  Directionally selective light adaptation: a visual consequence of receptor disarray? , 1974, Vision research.

[51]  Entoptic visualization of Stiles-Crawford effect. An indicator of eyeball shape. , 1968, Archives of ophthalmology.

[52]  L R Stark,et al.  Accommodation to static chromatic simulations of blurred retinal images , 1999, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[53]  A. Bradley,et al.  Theory and measurement of ocular chromatic aberration , 1990, Vision Research.

[54]  David Williams,et al.  Optical fiber properties of individual human cones. , 2002, Journal of vision.

[55]  G Smith,et al.  Angular Diameter of Defocus Blur Discs , 1982, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[56]  H. W. Leibowitz,et al.  The fixation point as a stimulus for accommodation , 1975, Vision Research.

[57]  E. Batschelet Circular statistics in biology , 1981 .

[58]  L Stark,et al.  Absence of an odd-error signal mechanism in human accommodation. , 1965, IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering.

[59]  W N Charman,et al.  ON THE USE OF SMALL ARTIFICIAL PUPILS TO OPEN‐LOOP THE ACCOMMODATION SYSTEM , 1987, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.