Analog Computer-Aided Detection (CAD) information can be more effective than binary marks
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] R. Passariello,et al. CAD (computed-aided detection) and CADx (computer aided diagnosis) systems in identifying and characterising lung nodules on chest CT: overview of research, developments and new prospects , 2010, La radiologia medica.
[2] D H Brainard,et al. The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.
[3] David Gur,et al. Prevalence effect in a laboratory environment. , 2003, Radiology.
[4] Christopher P Benton,et al. The direction of measured face aftereffects. , 2008, Journal of vision.
[5] C. D'Orsi,et al. Effectiveness of computer-aided detection in community mammography practice. , 2011, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.
[6] Maneesha Singh,et al. Explosives detection systems (EDS) for aviation security , 2003, Signal Process..
[7] P F Judy,et al. Influence of CT image size and format on accuracy of lung nodule detection. , 1998, Radiology.
[8] Michael Swift,et al. Screening mammography , 1993, The Lancet.
[9] S. Astley,et al. Single reading with computer-aided detection for screening mammography. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.
[10] H L Kundel,et al. Mechanism of satisfaction of search: eye position recordings in the reading of chest radiographs. , 1995, Radiology.
[11] C. Chabris,et al. Gorillas in Our Midst: Sustained Inattentional Blindness for Dynamic Events , 1999, Perception.
[12] Andrew T. Smith,et al. Sensitivity of human visual cortical areas to the stereoscopic depth of a moving stimulus. , 2008, Journal of vision.
[13] Matthew S Cain,et al. Anticipatory Anxiety Hinders Detection of a Second Target in Dual-Target Search , 2011, Psychological science.
[14] R Kikinis,et al. Spiral CT of the chest: comparison of cine and film-based viewing. , 1995, Radiology.
[15] Jeremy M Wolfe,et al. Prevalence effects in newly trained airport checkpoint screeners: trained observers miss rare targets, too. , 2013, Journal of vision.
[16] David Gur,et al. The prevalence effect in a laboratory environment: Changing the confidence ratings. , 2007, Academic radiology.
[17] R. Birdwell. The preponderance of evidence supports computer-aided detection for screening mammography. , 2009, Radiology.
[18] Jonathan H Sunshine,et al. How widely is computer-aided detection used in screening and diagnostic mammography? , 2010, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.
[19] J. Wolfe,et al. Varying Target Prevalence Reveals Two Dissociable Decision Criteria in Visual Search , 2010, Current Biology.
[20] Anina N. Rich,et al. Why do we miss rare targets? Exploring the boundaries of the low prevalence effect. , 2008, Journal of vision.
[21] Susan M Astley,et al. Single reading with computer-aided detection and double reading of screening mammograms in the United Kingdom National Breast Screening Program. , 2006, Radiology.
[22] Jeremy M Wolfe,et al. Prevalence of abnormalities influences cytologists' error rates in screening for cervical cancer. , 2011, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.
[23] Adam T. Biggs,et al. Improving the Efficacy of Security Screening Tasks: A Review of Visual Search Challenges and Ways to Mitigate Their Adverse Effects , 2015 .
[24] Karla Kerlikowske,et al. Performance benchmarks for screening mammography. , 2006, Radiology.
[25] K S Berbaum,et al. Role of faulty visual search in the satisfaction of search effect in chest radiography. , 1998, Academic radiology.
[26] Hongjing Lu,et al. A biological motion toolbox for reading, displaying, and manipulating motion capture data in research settings. , 2013, Journal of vision.
[27] L. Tabár,et al. Potential contribution of computer-aided detection to the sensitivity of screening mammography. , 2000, Radiology.
[28] K S Berbaum,et al. Role of faulty decision making in the satisfaction of search effect in chest radiography. , 2000, Academic radiology.
[29] Trafton Drew,et al. When and why might a computer-aided detection (CAD) system interfere with visual search? An eye-tracking study. , 2012, Academic radiology.
[30] Nico Karssemeijer,et al. Computer-aided detection of masses at mammography: interactive decision support versus prompts. , 2013, Radiology.
[31] Matthew S Cain,et al. Self-Induced Attentional Blink , 2013, Psychological science.
[32] Jeremy M. Wolfe,et al. 26.5 brief comms NEW , 2005 .
[33] I. Rock,et al. Inattentional blindness: Perception without attention. , 1998 .
[34] Paul Taylor,et al. Computer aids and human second reading as interventions in screening mammography: two systematic reviews to compare effects on cancer detection and recall rate. , 2008, European journal of cancer.
[35] Nico Karssemeijer,et al. Computer-aided detection versus independent double reading of masses on mammograms. , 2003, Radiology.
[36] Ehsan Samei,et al. Generalized "satisfaction of search": adverse influences on dual-target search accuracy. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.
[37] P. Ayton,et al. Use of computer-aided detection (CAD) tools in screening mammography: a multidisciplinary investigation. , 2005, The British journal of radiology.
[38] John Papaioannou,et al. Clinically missed cancer: how effectively can radiologists use computer-aided detection? , 2012, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[39] Karla K. Evans,et al. If You Don’t Find It Often, You Often Don’t Find It: Why Some Cancers Are Missed in Breast Cancer Screening , 2013, PloS one.
[40] Rachel F Brem,et al. Improvement in sensitivity of screening mammography with computer-aided detection: a multiinstitutional trial. , 2003, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[41] D G Pelli,et al. The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.
[42] B. Zheng,et al. Soft-copy mammographic readings with different computer-assisted detection cuing environments: preliminary findings. , 2001, Radiology.
[43] Harold L. Kundel,et al. Disease prevalence and the index of detectability: a survey of studies of lung cancer detection by chest radiography , 2000, Medical Imaging.
[44] J. Wolfe,et al. The Invisible Gorilla Strikes Again , 2013, Psychological science.
[45] T. Freer,et al. Screening mammography with computer-aided detection: prospective study of 12,860 patients in a community breast center. , 2001, Radiology.
[46] Nico Karssemeijer,et al. Using computer-aided detection in mammography as a decision support , 2010, European Radiology.
[47] Stephen H Adamo,et al. Rare, but obviously there: effects of target frequency and salience on visual search accuracy. , 2014, Acta psychologica.
[48] Nancy A Obuchowski,et al. A comparison of follow-up recommendations by chest radiologists, general radiologists, and pulmonologists using computer-aided detection to assess radiographs for actionable pulmonary nodules. , 2011, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[49] L. Philpotts,et al. Can computer-aided detection be detrimental to mammographic interpretation? , 2009, Radiology.
[50] Kevin S. Berbaum,et al. Missed fractures resulting from satisfaction of search effect , 1994, Emergency Radiology.
[51] C. Lehman,et al. Testing the effect of computer-assisted detection on interpretive performance in screening mammography. , 2006, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[52] Naomi M. Kenner,et al. Low target prevalence is a stubborn source of errors in visual search tasks. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[53] R. Brem,et al. Radiologist detection of microcalcifications with and without computer-aided detection: a comparative study. , 2001, Clinical radiology.
[54] Jeremy M. Wolfe,et al. Rare targets are often missed in visual search , 2005 .
[55] Daniel J Simons,et al. You do not talk about Fight Club if you do not notice Fight Club: Inattentional blindness for a simulated real-world assault , 2011, i-Perception.
[56] Cfp,et al. The Invisible Gorilla in the Room , 2013 .
[57] Stephen R Mitroff,et al. Different Predictors of Multiple-Target Search Accuracy between Nonprofessional and Professional Visual Searchers , 2014, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.