Two-level resampling as a novel method for the calculation of the expected value of sample information in economic trials.

It has already been pointed out that the bootstrap can be used to calculate the expected value of perfect information (EVPI) when individual-level data from a randomized controlled trial (RCT) is at hand. However, as mentioned by others, it is not clear if and how such a method can be extended to calculate the expected value of sample information (EVSI). In this article, we provide a nonparametric definition for EVPI and EVSI, which is based on considering the entire population distribution as the uncertain entity for which the current RCT provides partial information. This enables a theoretical justification for using the bootstrap for EVPI calculation and allows us to propose a two-level resampling method for EVSI calculation. What is considered as the sampling unit in this algorithm can range from the individual level net benefits to the full panel of the RCT data for an individual, enabling the analyst to decide on a trade-off between computational efficiency and comprehensiveness in value of information analysis. As such, we argue that this method, in addition to being consistent with the popular bootstrap method of RCT-based economic evaluations, is a flexible approach for EVPI and EVSI calculations.

[1]  R. Grieve,et al.  Non-parametric methods for cost-effectiveness analysis: the central limit theorem and the bootstrap compared. , 2010, Health economics.

[2]  J. Schafer Multiple imputation: a primer , 1999, Statistical methods in medical research.

[3]  Matthew Kowgier,et al.  Determining optimal sample sizes for multi-stage randomized clinical trials using value of information methods , 2008, Clinical trials.

[4]  Ron Goeree,et al.  Value of information methods for planning and analyzing clinical studies optimize decision making and research planning. , 2012, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[5]  Andrew R Willan,et al.  Clinical decision making and the expected value of information , 2007, Clinical trials.

[6]  D. Rubin The Bayesian Bootstrap , 1981 .

[7]  Roger A. Sugden,et al.  Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys , 1988 .

[8]  Anthony O'Hagan,et al.  Assessing and comparing costs: how robust are the bootstrap and methods based on asymptotic normality? , 2003, Health economics.

[9]  A H Briggs,et al.  Pulling cost-effectiveness analysis up by its bootstraps: a non-parametric approach to confidence interval estimation. , 1997, Health economics.

[10]  A E Ades,et al.  Expected Value of Sample Information Calculations in Medical Decision Modeling , 2004, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[11]  Darren McKay,et al.  External cephalic version beginning at 34 weeks' gestation versus 37 weeks' gestation: a randomized multicenter trial. , 2003, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[12]  Albert Y. Lo,et al.  A large sample study of the Bayesian bootstrap , 1987 .

[13]  Andrew R Willan,et al.  Accounting for between-study variation in incremental net benefit in value of information methodology. , 2012, Health economics.

[14]  Andrew R Willan,et al.  The value of information and optimal clinical trial design , 2005, Statistics in medicine.

[15]  Andrew R Willan,et al.  Optimal clinical trial design using value of information methods with imperfect implementation. , 2009, Health economics.

[16]  Andrew R Willan,et al.  Expected value of information and decision making in HTA. , 2007, Health economics.

[17]  Gordon B. Hazen,et al.  Sensitivity Analysis and the Expected Value of Perfect Information , 1998, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[18]  Theo Stijnen,et al.  Value of information analyses of economic randomized controlled trials: the treatment of intermittent claudication. , 2010, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.

[19]  Simon Eckermann,et al.  The Value of Value of Information , 2012, PharmacoEconomics.

[20]  A. Narayanan Computer generation of dirichlet random vectors , 1990 .