Fog collecting biomimetic surfaces: Influence of microstructure and wettability

We analyzed the fog collection efficiency of three different sets of samples: replica (with and without microstructures), copper wire (smooth and microgrooved) and polyolefin mesh (hydrophilic, superhydrophilic and hydrophobic). The collection efficiency of the samples was compared in each set separately to investigate the influence of microstructures and/or the wettability of the surfaces on fog collection. Based on the controlled experimental conditions chosen here large differences in the efficiency were found. We found that microstructured plant replica samples collected 2-3 times higher amounts of water than that of unstructured (smooth) samples. Copper wire samples showed similar results. Moreover, microgrooved wires had a faster dripping of water droplets than that of smooth wires. The superhydrophilic mesh tested here was proved more efficient than any other mesh samples with different wettability. The amount of collected fog by superhydrophilic mesh was about 5 times higher than that of hydrophilic (untreated) mesh and was about 2 times higher than that of hydrophobic mesh.

[1]  Todd E. Dawson,et al.  Foliar water uptake: a common water acquisition strategy for plants of the redwood forest , 2009, Oecologia.

[2]  Stephen S. O. Burgess,et al.  The contribution of fog to the water relations of Sequoia sempervirens (D. Don): foliar uptake and prevention of dehydration , 2004 .

[3]  N. Koratkar,et al.  Wetting‐Transparent Graphene Films for Hydrophobic Water‐Harvesting Surfaces , 2014, Advanced materials.

[4]  R. S. Schemenauer,et al.  Testing greenhouse shade nets in collection of fog for water supply , 2003 .

[5]  U. Lüttge.  Vascular plants as epiphytes : evolution and ecophysiology , 1989 .

[6]  T. Givnish,et al.  Absorptive Trichomes in Brocchinia reducta (Bromeliaceae) and Their Evolutionary and Systematic Significance , 1985 .

[7]  F T Malik,et al.  Nature's moisture harvesters: a comparative review , 2014, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[8]  Markus Bussmann,et al.  Modeling the splash of a droplet impacting a solid surface , 2000 .

[9]  P. Rundel.  Water Uptake by Organs Other Than Roots , 1982 .

[10]  Robert S. Schemenauer,et al.  Fog-water collection in arid coastal locations , 1991 .

[11]  Lei Jiang,et al.  Efficient Water Collection on Integrative Bioinspired Surfaces with Star‐Shaped Wettability Patterns , 2014, Advanced materials.

[12]  P. Gennes,et al.  Capillarity and Gravity , 2004 .

[13]  Hyuneui Lim,et al.  Water harvest via dewing. , 2012, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[14]  U. Müller-Doblies,et al.  Desert geophytes under dew and fog: The “curly-whirlies” of Namaqualand (South Africa) , 2011 .

[15]  J. McGettrick,et al.  Mimicking a Stenocara beetle's back for microcondensation using plasmachemical patterned superhydrophobic-superhydrophilic surfaces. , 2007, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[16]  Michael J. Savage,et al.  Fog-water collection for community use , 2014 .

[17]  J. Yeomans,et al.  Anisotropic drop morphologies on corrugated surfaces. , 2008, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[18]  W. Barthlott,et al.  The superhydrophilic and superoleophilic leaf surface of Ruellia devosiana (Acanthaceae): a biological model for spreading of water and oil on surfaces. , 2009, Functional plant biology : FPB.

[19]  B. Poelsema,et al.  Metastable droplets on shallow-grooved hydrophobic surfaces. , 2011, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[20]  D. Sivakumar,et al.  Drop impact process on a hydrophobic grooved surface , 2008 .

[21]  G. López,et al.  Anisotropic Wetting Surfaces with One‐Dimesional and Directional Structures: Fabrication Approaches, Wetting Properties and Potential Applications , 2012, Advanced materials.

[22]  W. Barthlott,et al.  Wasserabsorption durch blatt- und sproßorgane einiger Xerophyten , 1974 .

[23]  Bharat Bhushan,et al.  Diversity of structure, morphology and wetting of plant surfaces , 2008 .

[24]  Lei Jiang,et al.  Bioinspired Conical Copper Wire with Gradient Wettability for Continuous and Efficient Fog Collection , 2013, Advanced materials.

[25]  D. Sivakumar,et al.  Dynamic Contact Angle Beating From Drops Impacting onto Solid Surfaces Exhibiting Anisotropic Wetting , 2011 .

[26]  Marie Dacke,et al.  Animal or Plant: Which Is the Better Fog Water Collector? , 2012, PloS one.

[27]  H. Andrews,et al.  Three-dimensional hierarchical structures for fog harvesting. , 2011, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[28]  Anne-Marie Kietzig,et al.  Fog-harvesting inspired by the Stenocara beetle—An analysis of drop collection and removal from biomimetic samples with wetting contrast , 2013 .

[29]  C. Stafford,et al.  Anisotropic wetting on tunable micro-wrinkled surfaces. , 2007, Soft matter.

[30]  S. Vogel.  Life in Moving Fluids: The Physical Biology of Flow , 1981 .

[31]  Gareth H McKinley,et al.  Optimal design of permeable fiber network structures for fog harvesting. , 2013, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[32]  Lei Jiang,et al.  Functional Fibers with Unique Wettability Inspired by Spider Silks , 2012, Advanced materials.

[33]  O. Klemm,et al.  Fog deposition to a Tillandsia carpet in the Atacama Desert , 2009 .

[34]  Anthony M. Jacobi,et al.  Creating micro-scale surface topology to achieve anisotropic wettability on an aluminum surface , 2006 .

[35]  Jamal Sarsour,et al.  Fog as a Fresh-Water Resource: Overview and Perspectives , 2012, AMBIO.

[36]  W. Barthlott,et al.  A fast, precise and low-cost replication technique for nano- and high-aspect-ratio structures of biological and artificial surfaces , 2008, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[37]  Lei Jiang,et al.  Facile and Large‐Scale Fabrication of a Cactus‐Inspired Continuous Fog Collector , 2014 .

[38]  Neelesh A Patankar,et al.  Anisotropy in the wetting of rough surfaces. , 2005, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[39]  Lei Jiang,et al.  Controlled Fabrication and Water Collection Ability of Bioinspired Artificial Spider Silks , 2011, Advanced materials.

[40]  D. Sivakumar,et al.  Impact of liquid drops on a rough surface comprising microgrooves , 2008 .

[41]  Stuart C. Thickett,et al.  Biomimetic Surface Coatings for Atmospheric Water Capture Prepared by Dewetting of Polymer Films , 2011, Advanced materials.

[42]  Anita Roth-Nebelsick,et al.  Efficient fog harvesting by Stipagrostis sabulicola (Namib dune bushman grass) , 2010 .

[43]  Robert S. Schemenauer,et al.  A Proposed Standard Fog Collector for Use in High-Elevation Regions , 1994 .

[44]  R. Sanderson,et al.  Exploring fog as a supplementary water source in Namibia , 2002 .

[45]  D. Benzing.  Vascular epiphytism: taxonomic participation and adaptive diversity , 1987 .

[46]  W. Barthlott,et al.  Ultrastructure and chemistry of the cell wall of the moss Rhacocarpus purpurascens (Rhacocarpaceae): a puzzling architecture among plants , 1998, Planta.

[47]  Exequiel Ezcurra,et al.  The narrow-leaf syndrome: a functional and evolutionary approach to the form of fog-harvesting rosette plants , 2007, Oecologia.

[48]  J. Sarsour,et al.  Leaf surface structures enable the endemic Namib desert grass Stipagrostis sabulicola to irrigate itself with fog water , 2012, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[49]  Yongping Hou,et al.  Water collection behavior and hanging ability of bioinspired fiber. , 2012, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[50]  Lei Jiang,et al.  A multi-structural and multi-functional integrated fog collection system in cactus , 2012, Nature Communications.

[51]  R. Holmes,et al.  Large fog collectors: New strategies for collection efficiency and structural response to wind pressure , 2015 .

[52]  M. Seely,et al.  Irregular fog as a water source for desert dune beetles , 1979, Oecologia.

[53]  P. Tarazona.  Capillarity and Wetting , 1987 .