NUMERICAL STUDY AND DYNAMIC BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS OF MECHANICAL HEART VALVE

This paper develops an analysis tool, for the mechanical heart valve designs, which contains a quick flow analysis model and a pseudo steady-state dynamic model. The flow model utilizes an irrotational, inviscid algorithm of source/doublet elements simulating the closed leaflet geometry and the aortic root coupled with a boundary layer model to simulate the viscous components. The numerical study provides quick simulation and vital design data of the shear stress distributed over the valve leaflet, the separation point prediction behind the leaflet and the sewing ring, and the aerodynamic loads acting on the leaflet. Those aerodynamic loads have been sent to a dynamic model, which simulates the leaflet motion as a 2nd order rotating system, to simulate the opening/closing characteristics of the leaflet. The analysis of the presented new heart valve design leads to a conclusion that the regurgitant volumes depends very much on the orientation of the gravity force. The maximum difference of the ratio of the valve closing regurgitation to the main flow can be as high as 12%. Hence the leaflet ought to be designed with a light material to avoid the unstable influence on the heart work due to the human's physical actions.

[1]  C. Peskin,et al.  A three-dimensional computational method for blood flow in the heart. II. contractile fibers , 1989 .

[2]  G. Dubini,et al.  Computational Fluid Dynamics of Artificial Heart Valves , 1991, The International journal of artificial organs.

[3]  A A van Steenhoven,et al.  In vitro closing behaviour of Björk-Shiley, St Jude and Hancock heart valve prostheses in relation to the in vivo recorded aortic valve closure. , 1982, Journal of biomechanics.

[4]  J. Fisher Comparative study of the hydrodynamic function of the size 19mm and 21mm St. Jude Medical Hemodynamic Plus Bileaflet Heart valves. , 1994, The Journal of heart valve disease.

[5]  H. Itō,et al.  Flow in Rotating Straight Pipes of Circular Cross Section , 1971 .

[6]  A P Yoganathan,et al.  In vitro flow dynamics of four prosthetic aortic valves: a comparative analysis. , 1989, Journal of biomechanics.

[7]  H Greenfield,et al.  The prosthetic heart valve and computer graphics. , 1972, JAMA.

[8]  J Fisher,et al.  Comparative study of the hydrodynamic function of the CarboMedics valve. , 1991, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[9]  Annappa A. Prabhu,et al.  Dynamic analysis of flutter in disk type mechanical heart valve prostheses. , 1988, Journal of biomechanics.

[10]  J. Katz,et al.  Low-Speed Aerodynamics , 1991 .

[11]  H Reul,et al.  Model studies at mechanical aortic heart valve prostheses--Part I: Steady-state flow fields and pressure loss coefficients. , 1988, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[12]  C S Peskin,et al.  Computer-assisted design of butterfly bileaflet valves for the mitral position. , 1985, Scandinavian journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[13]  P. J. Drury,et al.  Twenty-Five Years of Heart Valve Substitutes: A Review1 , 1983, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.

[14]  A. Yoganathan,et al.  Flow characteristics of the St. Jude prosthetic valve: an in vitro and in vivo study. , 2008, Artificial organs.

[15]  A P Yoganathan,et al.  Turbulent shear stress measurements in the vicinity of aortic heart valve prostheses. , 1986, Journal of biomechanics.

[16]  S. P. Nolan Defining valve performance: importance and difficulties in testing heart valve replacement devices. , 1992, Journal of medical engineering & technology.