Customization of closed-cell aluminum foam properties using design of experiments

Abstract The closed-cell aluminum foam processing by liquid melt method using titanium hydride (TiH 2 ) decomposition method is studied for customizing the process variables for explicit requirements. Design of experiments (DOEs) is employed in this study, which is a technique for planning and conducting experiments and analyzing the responses to bring out valid and objective conclusions. In the first stage, four process variables such as, holding time, amount of TiH 2 , amount of calcium addition and stirring time after calcium addition were adopted to identify the most influencing process variables by using half-fractional factorial design. Holding time and the amount of TiH 2 addition were recognized as the significant process variables and those parameters were studied for non-linear relationship at a higher-level design using response surface methodology (RSM). The developed empirical models were used to derive inferences on the influence of these process variables on foam structure like relative density, pore diameter and cell aspect ratio. These structural properties of the foam in turn govern the mechanical property of closed-cell aluminum foam and static compression tests were conducted to study the correlations between them.

[1]  H. Kohzu,et al.  Enhancement of energy absorption in a closed-cell aluminum by the modification of cellular structures , 1999 .

[2]  J. Banhart.  Metal Foams: Production and Stability , 2006 .

[3]  John Banhart,et al.  Improvement of aluminium foam technology by tailoring of blowing agent , 2006 .

[4]  Xiaolin Wang,et al.  Sound insulation property of Al–Si closed-cell aluminum foam sandwich panels , 2007 .

[5]  Zhenlun Song,et al.  Evolution of foamed aluminum structure in foaming process , 2001 .

[6]  A. Kennedy.  The effect of TiH2 heat treatment on gas release and foaming in Al–TiH2 preforms , 2002 .

[7]  Zhenlun Song,et al.  Effects of viscosity on cellular structure of foamed aluminum in foaming process , 2000 .

[8]  U. Ramamurty,et al.  Impact energy absorption in an Al foam at low velocities , 2003 .

[9]  R. Raj,et al.  Aluminum Melt Foam Processing for Light-Weight Structures , 2007 .

[10]  B. Hur,et al.  Effect of decomposition properties of titanium hydride on the foaming process and pore structures of Al alloy melt foam , 2007 .

[11]  M. Ashby,et al.  Cellular solids: Structure & properties , 1988 .

[12]  N. Zhao,et al.  Effect of pore size and relative density on the mechanical properties of open cell aluminum foams , 2007 .

[13]  A. Kennedy,et al.  The effect of Mg addition on the stability of Al–Al2O3 foams made by a powder metallurgy route , 2006 .

[14]  Lorna J. Gibson,et al.  Compressive and tensile behaviour of aluminum foams , 1999 .

[15]  R. Edwin Raj,et al.  Comparison of quasi-static and dynamic compression behavior of closed-cell aluminum foam , 2009 .

[16]  H. Lefakis,et al.  Mechanical properties of Al metal foams , 2004 .

[17]  J. Banhart,et al.  Modification of titanium hydride for improved aluminium foam manufacture , 2006 .

[18]  S. Nutt,et al.  Rheology of foaming aluminum melts , 2007 .

[19]  John Banhart,et al.  Aluminium foams for lighter vehicles , 2005 .

[20]  U. Ramamurty,et al.  Mechanical property extraction through conical indentation of a closed-cell aluminum foam , 2004 .

[21]  Zhiqian Guo,et al.  Research into the effect of cell diameter of aluminum foam on its compressive and energy absorption properties , 2007 .

[22]  C. C. Yang,et al.  Foaming characteristics control during production of aluminum alloy foam , 2000 .

[23]  M. Aly.  Effect of pore size on the tensile behavior of open-cell Ti foams: Experimental results , 2010 .

[24]  Frantisek Simancik,et al.  Compressive strength of aluminium foams , 2004 .

[25]  D. Mondal,et al.  On the moduli of closed-cell aluminum foam , 2007 .

[26]  C. C. Yang,et al.  The effects of viscosity and cooling conditions on the foamability of aluminum alloy , 2003 .

[27]  Jürgen Dittrich,et al.  Aluminium foam sandwich structures for space applications , 2006 .

[28]  U. Ramamurty,et al.  Variability in mechanical properties of a metal foam , 2004 .

[29]  John Banhart,et al.  Aluminium foams for transport industry , 1997 .

[30]  Hilary Bart-Smith,et al.  On the mechanical performance of closed cell Al alloy foams , 1997 .

[31]  I. W. Hall,et al.  Improving the energy absorption of closed cell aluminum foams , 2002 .

[32]  Michael F. Ashby,et al.  Multifunctionality of cellular metal systems , 1998 .

[33]  Uday K. Vaidya,et al.  Blast impact response of aluminum foam sandwich composites , 2006 .

[34]  R. Raj,et al.  Structural and compressive property correlation of closed-cell aluminum foam , 2009 .

[35]  H. Degischer.  INNOVATIVE LIGHT METALS : METAL MATRIX COMPOSITES AND FOAMED ALUMINIUM , 1997 .

[36]  Lorna J. Gibson,et al.  Aluminum foams produced by liquid-state processes , 1998 .

[37]  S. Odenbach,et al.  Stabilisation of liquid metallic foams by solid particles , 2005 .

[38]  J. Banhart,et al.  Metal foams—high temperature colloids: Part I. Ex situ analysis of metal foams , 2005 .