Tail shortening with developing eddies in a rough‐walled rock fracture

Understanding fluid flow and solute transport in rough‐walled fractures is important in many problems such as geological storage of CO2 and siting of radioactive waste repositories. The first microscopic observation of fluid flow and solute transport through a rough‐walled fracture was made to assess the evolution of eddies and their effect on non‐Fickian tailing. A noteworthy phenomenon was observed that as the eddy grew, the particles were initially caught in and swirled around within eddies, and then cast back into main flow channel, which reduced tailing. This differs from the conventional conceptual model, which presumes a distinct separation between mobile and immobile zones. Fluid flow and solute transport modeling within the 3‐D fracture confirmed tail shortening due to mass transfer by advective paths between the eddies and the main flow channel, as opposed to previous 2‐D numerical studies that showed increased tailing with growing eddies.

[1]  Tanguy Le Borgne,et al.  Modeling preasymptotic transport in flows with significant inertial and trapping effects – The importance of velocity correlations and a spatial Markov model , 2014 .

[2]  Seung Hyun Lee,et al.  Assessment of the validity of Stokes and Reynolds equations for fluid flow through a rough‐walled fracture with flow imaging , 2014 .

[3]  Jiazhong Qian,et al.  Eddy correlations for water flow in a single fracture with abruptly changing aperture , 2012 .

[4]  D. Bolster,et al.  The impact of inertial effects on solute dispersion in a channel with periodically varying aperture , 2012 .

[5]  Jiazhong Qian,et al.  Solute transport in a filled single fracture under non-Darcian flow , 2011 .

[6]  K. Lee,et al.  Wettability-dependent DNAPL migration in a rough-walled fracture. , 2010, Journal of contaminant hydrology.

[7]  Richard A. Ketcham,et al.  Effects of inertia and directionality on flow and transport in a rough asymmetric fracture , 2009 .

[8]  Phillip M. Halleck,et al.  X-ray CT and hydraulic evidence for a relationship between fracture conductivity and adjacent matrix porosity , 2009 .

[9]  Richard A. Ketcham,et al.  Navier‐Stokes flow and transport simulations using real fractures shows heavy tailing due to eddies , 2007 .

[10]  Giovanni Grasselli,et al.  Trapping zones: The effect of fracture roughness on the directional anisotropy of fluid flow and colloid transport in a single fracture , 2006 .

[11]  G. Bodvarsson,et al.  Evidence of Multi-Process Matrix Diffusion in a Single Fracture from a Field Tracer Test , 2006 .

[12]  M. Becker,et al.  Tracer transport in fractured crystalline rock: Evidence of nondiffusive breakthrough tailing , 2000 .

[13]  E. Sudicky,et al.  The interpretation of a tracer experiment conducted in a single fracture under conditions of natural groundwater flow , 1999 .

[14]  Arturo A. Keller,et al.  High resolution, non-destructive measurement and characterization of fracture apertures , 1998 .

[15]  S. Roux,et al.  Tracer Dispersion in Rough Open Cracks , 1998 .

[16]  K. Novakowski,et al.  Preliminary interpretation of tracer experiments conducted in a discrete rock fracture under conditions of natural flow , 1995 .

[17]  K. Raven,et al.  Interpretation of field tracer tests of a single fracture using a transient solute storage model , 1988 .

[18]  Y. Tsang,et al.  Channel model of flow through fractured media , 1987 .

[19]  I. Neretnieks,et al.  Analysis of Some Laboratory Tracer Runs in Natural Fissures , 1985 .

[20]  Ivars Neretnieks,et al.  A note on fracture flow dispersion mechanisms in the ground , 1983 .

[21]  I. Neretnieks,et al.  Tracer movement in a single fissure in granitic rock: Some experimental results and their interpretation , 1982 .