Effects of the Distance from a Diffusive Surface on the Objective and Perceptual Evaluation of the Sound Field in a Small Simulated Variable-Acoustics Hall

Simulations of the acoustic effects that diffusive surfaces have on the objective acoustic parameters and on sound perception have not yet been fully understood. To this end, acoustic simulations have been performed in Odeon in the model of a variable-acoustic concert hall. This paper is presented as a follow-up study to a previous paper that dealt with in-field measurements only. As in measurements, a diffusive and a reflective condition of one of the lateral walls have been considered in the room models. Two modeling alternatives of the diffusive condition, that is, (a) a flat surface with high scattering coefficient applied; and (b) a triangular relief modeled including edge diffraction, have been investigated. Objective acoustic parameters, such as early decay time (EDT), reverberation time (T30), clarity (C80), definition (D50), and interaural cross correlation (IACC), have been compared between the two conditions. Moreover, an auditory experiment has been performed to determine the maximum distance from a diffusive surface at which the simulated acoustic scattering effects are still audible. Although the simulated objective results showed a good match with measured values, the subjective results showed that the differences between the diffuse and reflective conditions become significant when model (b) is used.

[1]  J. Braasch,et al.  Investigations of architectural configurations and acoustic parameters for multiple sources . , 2010 .

[2]  Uwe M. Stephenson,et al.  An Energetic Approach for the Simulation of Diffraction within Ray Tracing Based on the Uncertainty Relation , 2010 .

[3]  Dirk Schröder,et al.  Physically based real-time auralization of interactive virtual environments , 2011 .

[4]  J. Braasch,et al.  Echo thresholds for reflections from acoustically diffusive architectural surfaces. , 2012, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  M. O'Mahony,et al.  POWER AND SENSITIVITY OF THE SAME‐DIFFERENT TEST: COMPARISON WITH TRIANGLE AND DUO‐TRIO METHODS , 1998 .

[6]  Sandeep Kumar,et al.  Appl. Sci , 2013 .

[7]  J. H. Rindel,et al.  The Use of Computer Modeling in Room Acoustics , 2000 .

[8]  T. Lokki,et al.  Geometry reduction in room acoustics modeling , 2008 .

[9]  Tapio Lokki,et al.  SUBJECTIVE EVALUATION OF AURALIZATION OF PHYSICS-BASED ROOM ACOUSTICS MODELING , 2001 .

[10]  Steven R. Ryherd,et al.  Interactions of Model Detail Level and Scattering Coefficients in Room Acoustic Computer Simulation , 2004 .

[11]  Yong Hee Kim,et al.  Influence of absorption properties of materials on the accuracy of simulated acoustical measures in 1:10 scale model test , 2009 .

[12]  J. Jeon,et al.  Subjective and objective evaluations of a scattered sound field in a scale model opera house. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  V. M. A. Peutz.  The Variable Acoustics of the Espace de Projection of Ircam (Paris) , 1978 .

[14]  C. L. Christensen.  A new scattering method that combines roughness and diffraction effects , 2005 .

[15]  A. Pagano,et al.  Acoustical prediction in some Italian theatres , 2001 .

[16]  Mendel Kleiner,et al.  Edge Diffraction and Surface Scattering in Concert Halls: Physical and Perceptual Aspects , 2004 .

[17]  Yong Hee Kim,et al.  Scale Model Investigations of Diffuser Application Strategies for Acoustical Design of Performance Venues , 2011 .

[18]  Dirk Schröder,et al.  Modeling (Non-)uniform scattering distributions in geometrical acoustics , 2013 .

[19]  Dana S. Hougland,et al.  Concert and Opera Halls: How They Sound , 1996 .

[20]  Michael Vorländer,et al.  Frequency- and Time-dependent Geometry for Real-time Auralizations , 2010 .

[21]  Kirill V. Horoshenkov,et al.  Acoustic Absorbers and Diffusers: Theory, Design and Application, third ed., Trevor J. Cox, Peter D’Antonio. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2017). ISBN: 9781498740999 , 2017 .

[22]  J. Rathsam,et al.  The influence of absorption factors on the sensitivity of a virtual room’s sound field to scattering coefficients , 2008 .

[23]  Jens Holger Rindel.  Computer Simulation Techniques for Acoustical Design of Rooms , 1997 .

[24]  P. Dziegielewski,et al.  Can Uhear me now? Validation of an iPod-based hearing loss screening test. , 2012, Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale.

[25]  Tapio Lokki,et al.  The role of diffusive architectural surfaces on auditory spatial discrimination in performance venues. , 2013, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[26]  Jason E. Summers.  Auralization: Fundamentals of Acoustics, Modelling, Simulation, Algorithms, and Acoustic Virtual Reality , 2008 .

[27]  Felix Wichmann,et al.  The psychometric function: II. Bootstrap-based confidence intervals and sampling , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[28]  Uwe M. Stephenson,et al.  A Combination of the Sound Particle Simulation Method and the Radiosity Method , 2011 .

[29]  J. Blauert.  Spatial Hearing: The Psychophysics of Human Sound Localization , 1983 .

[30]  Tobias Bachmeier.  Architectural Acoustics Blending Sound Sources Sound Fields And Listeners , 2016 .

[31]  G. Karaca,et al.  Ototoxic effect of topical oxiconazole and terbinafine in rats. , 2012, Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale.

[32]  Michael Vorländer.  Prediction tools in acoustics-Can we trust the PC ? , 2010 .

[33]  Louena Shtrepi,et al.  Objective and perceptual evaluation of distance-dependent scattered sound effects in a small variable-acoustics hall. , 2016, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[34]  Brian F. G. Katz,et al.  Creation and calibration method of acoustical models for historic virtual reality auralizations , 2015, Virtual Reality.

[35]  Y. W. Lam,et al.  A comparison of three diffuse reflection modeling methods used in room acoustics computer models , 1996 .

[36]  Claus Lynge Christensen,et al.  Odeon Room Acoustics Program version 3.1 - User manual: Industrial, Auditorium and Combined editions , 1998 .

[37]  F A Wichmann,et al.  Ning for Helpful Comments and Suggestions. This Paper Benefited Con- Siderably from Conscientious Peer Review, and We Thank Our Reviewers the Psychometric Function: I. Fitting, Sampling, and Goodness of Fit , 2001 .

[38]  Xiangyang Zeng,et al.  Practical methods to define scattering coefficients in a room acoustics computer model , 2006 .

[39]  M. Vorländer.  Computer simulations in room acoustics: concepts and uncertainties. , 2013, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[40]  Mendel Kleiner,et al.  Auralization-An Overview , 1993 .

[41]  M. Hodgson.  On the prediction of sound fields in large empty rooms , 1988 .

[42]  Mendel Kleiner,et al.  A Macroscopic View of Diffuse Reflection , 1993 .

[43]  Louena Shtrepi,et al.  Objective and perceptual assessment of the scattered sound field in a simulated concert hall. , 2015, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[44]  I. Bork.  Report on the 3rd round robin on room acoustical computer simulation - : Part II: Calculations , 2005 .

[45]  Michael Vorländer,et al.  Virtual reality for architectural acoustics , 2015 .

[46]  M. Schroeder,et al.  On Frequency Response Curves in Rooms. Comparison of Experimental, Theoretical, and Monte Carlo Results for the Average Frequency Spacing between Maxima , 1962 .