OMR-Arena: Automated Measurement and Stimulation System to Determine Mouse Visual Thresholds Based on Optomotor Responses

Measurement of the optomotor response is a common way to determine thresholds of the visual system in animals. Particularly in mice, it is frequently used to characterize the visual performance of different genetically modified strains or to test the effect of various drugs on visual performance. Several methods have been developed to facilitate the presentation of stimuli using computer screens or projectors. Common methods are either based on the measurement of eye movement during optokinetic reflex behavior or rely on the measurement of head and/or body-movements during optomotor responses. Eye-movements can easily and objectively be quantified, but their measurement requires invasive fixation of the animals. Head movements can be observed in freely moving animals, but until now depended on the judgment of a human observer who reported the counted tracking movements of the animal during an experiment. In this study we present a novel measurement and stimulation system based on open source building plans and software. This system presents appropriate 360 stimuli while simultaneously video-tracking the animal's head-movements without fixation. The on-line determined head gaze is used to adjust the stimulus to the head position, as well as to automatically calculate visual acuity. Exemplary, we show that automatically measured visual response curves of mice match the results obtained by a human observer very well. The spatial acuity thresholds yielded by the automatic analysis are also consistent with the human observer approach and with published results. Hence, OMR-arena provides an affordable, convenient and objective way to measure mouse visual performance.

[1]  R. Douglas,et al.  Rapid quantification of adult and developing mouse spatial vision using a virtual optomotor system. , 2004, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[2]  G. Prusky,et al.  Rod photoreceptors drive circadian photoentrainment across a wide range of light intensities , 2010, Nature Neuroscience.

[3]  I. Jackson,et al.  Presence of visual head tracking differentiates normal sighted from retinal degenerate mice , 2002, Neuroscience Letters.

[4]  D. Tank,et al.  Quantifying the ontogeny of optokinetic and vestibuloocular behaviors in zebrafish, medaka, and goldfish. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[5]  R. Baker,et al.  Discharge characteristics of medial rectus and abducens motoneurons in the goldfish. , 1991, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  Andreas Hein,et al.  Virtual experimental arena for behavioral experiments on small vertebrates , 2011, 2011 4th International Congress on Image and Signal Processing.

[7]  Mark Segal,et al.  The OpenGL Graphics System: A Specification , 2004 .

[8]  V. Denenberg,et al.  Effects of neocortical ectopias upon the acquisition and retention of a non-spatial reference memory task in BXSB mice. , 1998, Brain research. Developmental brain research.

[9]  S. D. Lac,et al.  Comparison of plasticity and development of mouse optokinetic and vestibulo-ocular reflexes suggests differential gain control mechanisms , 2004, Vision Research.

[10]  S. Neuhauss,et al.  VisioTracker, an innovative automated approach to oculomotor analysis. , 2011, Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE.

[11]  Martin Hrabé de Angelis,et al.  Variation of the response to the optokinetic drum among various strains of mice. , 2008, Frontiers in bioscience : a journal and virtual library.

[12]  Laura Gianfranceschi,et al.  PII: S0042-6989(98)00169-2 , 1998 .

[13]  T. Branchek,et al.  Refractive state and visual acuity in the hooded rat , 1976, Vision Research.

[14]  Sabina P Huber-Reggi,et al.  Analysis of optokinetic response in zebrafish by computer-based eye tracking. , 2013, Methods in molecular biology.

[15]  Konrad Lehmann,et al.  Age-Dependent Ocular Dominance Plasticity in Adult Mice , 2008, PloS one.

[16]  Thomas Euler,et al.  Chromatic Coding from Cone-type Unselective Circuits in the Mouse Retina , 2013, Neuron.

[17]  R. Douglas,et al.  Behavioral assessment of visual acuity in mice and rats , 2000, Vision Research.

[18]  D. Sinex,et al.  A psychophysical investigation of spatial vision in the normal and reeler mutant mouse , 1979, Vision Research.

[19]  Yumiko Umino,et al.  The Relationship between Slow Photoresponse Recovery Rate and Temporal Resolution of Vision , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[20]  Victor H. Denenberg,et al.  A behavioral and neuroanatomical assessment of an inbred substrain of 129 mice with behavioral comparisons to C57BL/6J mice , 1999, Brain Research.

[21]  M. Frens,et al.  Three-dimensional optokinetic eye movements in the C57BL/6J mouse. , 2010, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[22]  Friedrich Kretschmer,et al.  Automated measurement of spectral sensitivity of motion vision during optokinetic behavior , 2012, Neurocomputing.

[23]  M. Frens,et al.  Age- and sex-related differences in contrast sensitivity in C57BL/6 mice. , 2009, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[24]  R. Morris Developments of a water-maze procedure for studying spatial learning in the rat , 1984, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[25]  C. Gotti,et al.  Visual acuity is reduced in alpha 7 nicotinic receptor knockout mice. , 2012, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[26]  Herwig Baier,et al.  Visuomotor Behaviors in Larval Zebrafish after GFP-Guided Laser Ablation of the Optic Tectum , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[27]  Picaud Serge,et al.  The optomotor response: A robust first-line visual screening method for mice , 2005, Vision Research.

[28]  PII: S0042-6989(96)00229-5 , 1997 .

[29]  Stephan C F Neuhauss,et al.  The optokinetic response in zebrafish and its applications. , 2008, Frontiers in bioscience : a journal and virtual library.

[30]  Tadashi Isa,et al.  PC-based high-speed video-oculography for measuring rapid eye movements in mice , 2004, Neuroscience Research.

[31]  R M Douglas,et al.  Independent visual threshold measurements in the two eyes of freely moving rats and mice using a virtual-reality optokinetic system , 2005, Visual Neuroscience.

[32]  F. Kretschmer,et al.  Automated determinination of head gaze in rodents , 2012, 2012 5th International Congress on Image and Signal Processing.

[33]  Chethan Pandarinath,et al.  Ganglion Cell Adaptability: Does the Coupling of Horizontal Cells Play a Role? , 2008, PloS one.

[34]  Jeremy Nathans,et al.  The Optokinetic Reflex as a Tool for Quantitative Analyses of Nervous System Function in Mice: Application to Genetic and Drug-Induced Variation , 2008, PloS one.

[35]  Lawrence H. Pinto,et al.  Tests of the mouse visual system , 2000, Mammalian Genome.

[36]  Jonathan B. Demb,et al.  Spectral and Temporal Sensitivity of Cone-Mediated Responses in Mouse Retinal Ganglion Cells , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[37]  Stuart Anstis,et al.  PII: S0042-6989(97)00159-4 , 2003 .

[38]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[39]  Kenji Kawano,et al.  Initiation of the optokinetic response (OKR) in mice. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[40]  W. Precht,et al.  Resetting fast phases of head and eye and their linkage in the frog , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[41]  R. E. Brown,et al.  Visual detection, pattern discrimination and visual acuity in 14 strains of mice , 2006, Genes, brain, and behavior.

[42]  C. Barnes Memory deficits associated with senescence: a neurophysiological and behavioral study in the rat. , 1979, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[43]  David S. Greenberg,et al.  Rats maintain an overhead binocular field at the expense of constant fusion , 2013, Nature.

[44]  J. S Stahl,et al.  A comparison of video and magnetic search coil recordings of mouse eye movements , 2000, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.