Reactions to Appraisal Discrepancies: Performance Ratings and Attributions

The traditional top-down approach to performance appraisal has been criticized as not keeping pace with the move toward more participative organizations of the last decade. This has led many organizations to adopt newer performance appraisal systems that use multiple feedback sources (e.g., 360-degree feedback systems). However, research indicates that multiple feedback sources often disagree on performance ratings and attributions. The current paper reports the results of one laboratory and one field study that show the importance of performance and attributional rating discrepancies on the appraisal process.

[1]  H. Kelley,et al.  Attribution theory and research. , 1980, Annual review of psychology.

[2]  Richard W. Beatty,et al.  360‐degree feedback as a competitive advantage , 1993 .

[3]  Douglas R. Glasnapp.  Change Scores and Regression Suppressor Conditions , 1984 .

[4]  O. J. Harvey,et al.  Reactions to unfavorable evaluations of the self made by other persons. , 1957, Journal of personality.

[5]  J. Harvey,et al.  New Directions in Attribution Research , 2018 .

[6]  D. Hamilton.  Responses to cognitive inconsistencies: personaity, discrepancy level, and response stability. , 1969, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[7]  Herbert H. Meyer,et al.  A solution to the performance appraisal feedback enigma , 1991 .

[8]  H. J. Bernardin,et al.  Attitudes of first-line supervisors toward subordinate appraisals , 1993 .

[9]  Kenneth H. Blanchard,et al.  So you want to know your leadership style , 1974 .

[10]  Mark J. Martinko,et al.  The Leader/Member Attribution Process , 1987 .

[11]  Paul E. Levy,et al.  The Effects of Source Credibility and Performance Rating Discrepancy on Reactions to Multiple Raters1 , 1995 .

[12]  B. Weiner.  An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. , 1985, Psychological review.

[13]  Jiing-Lih Farh,et al.  Effects of comparative performance information on the accuracy of self-ratings and agreement between self- and supervisor ratings. , 1989 .

[14]  John Schaubroeck,et al.  A meta-analysis of self-supervisor, self-peer, and peer-supervisor ratings. , 1988 .

[15]  Jiing-Lih Farh,et al.  Effects of Self-Esteem on Leniency Bias in Self-Reports of Performance: A Structural Equation Model Analysis , 2007 .

[16]  Stephen G. West,et al.  Validity of self-evaluation of ability: A review and meta-analysis , 1982 .

[17]  P. Levy.  Self-Appraisal and Attributions: A Test of a Model , 1993 .

[18]  B. Weiner,et al.  On sin versus sickness. A theory of perceived responsibility and social motivation. , 1993, The American psychologist.

[19]  A. Bedeian,et al.  AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION OF SELF‐APPRAISAL‐BASED PERFORMANCE EVALUATION , 1988 .

[20]  Gerald L. Blakely.  The Effects of Performance Rating Discrepancies on Supervisors and Subordinates , 1993 .

[21]  M. Ross,et al.  Facilitation of ego-biased attributions by means of self-serving observer feedback. , 1977 .

[22]  J. Edwards.  The Study of Congruence in Organizational Behavior Research: Critique and a Proposed Alternative , 1994 .

[23]  B. Bannister,et al.  Performance outcome feedback and attributional feedback: interactive effects on recipient responses , 1986 .

[24]  T. Mitchell,et al.  Attributional processes of leaders in leader–member interactions. , 1979 .

[25]  R. Klimoski,et al.  Use of verbal protocols to trace cognitions associated with self- and supervisor evaluations of performance , 1990 .

[26]  Lyman W. Porter,et al.  Employee responses to formal performance appraisal feedback , 1986 .

[27]  Stephen A. Norman,et al.  Actor-observer differences in perceptions of effective control. , 1975 .

[28]  H. John Bernardin,et al.  Performance appraisal : assessing human behavior at work , 1984 .

[29]  Stephen A. Norman,et al.  Distortion in Person Perception as a Consequence of the Need for Effective Control. , 1978 .

[30]  P. Levy,et al.  Regulating affect interpersonally: When low esteem leads to greater enhancement. , 1989 .