Use of pharmacokinetic/ pharmacodynamic modelling for starting dose selection in first-in-human trials of high-risk biologics.

WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS SUBJECT Recent regulatory guidance has highlighted the importance of using pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) modelling in the selection of starting doses in first-in-human trials of high-risk biologics. However, limited examples exist in literature illustrating this procedure. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS An interpretation of the recommended dose-selection methodology and the minimum anticipated biological effect level (MABEL) principle, contained in the updated European Medicines Agency guidance on risk-mitigation strategies for first-in-human studies, is presented. Some literature and simulation-based examples of the application of PK-PD modelling principles to starting dose selection using in vitro and in vivo data under the MABEL paradigm are highlighted, along with the advantages and limitations of this approach. AIMS To illustrate the use of pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) models to select rational starting doses in clinical trials within the minimum anticipated biological effect level (MABEL) principle using literature data and through simulations. METHODS The new European Medicines Agency guidance on starting dose selection of high-risk biologics was analysed considering the basic pharmacological properties and preclinical testing limitations of many biologics. The MABEL approach to dose selection was illustrated through simulations and through literature-reported examples on the selection of starting doses for biologics such as antibodies based on in vitro biomarker data, in vivo PK and PK-PD data. RESULTS Literature reports indicating the use of preclinical pharmacological and toxicological data to select successfully safe starting doses in line with the MABEL principle are summarized. PK-PD model-based simulations of receptor occupancy for an anti-IgE antibody system indicate that the relative abundance of IgE in animal models and patients and the turnover rate of the IgE-antibody complex relative to the off-rate of the antibody from IgE are important determinants of in vivo receptor occupancy. CONCLUSIONS Mechanistic PK-PD models are capable of integrating preclinical in vitro and in vivo data to select starting doses rationally in first-in-human trials. Biological drug-receptor interaction dynamics is complex and multiple factors affect the dose-receptor occupancy relationship. Thus, these factors should be taken into account when selecting starting doses.

[1]  A. Tolcher,et al.  Technology Insight: cytotoxic drug immunoconjugates for cancer therapy , 2007, Nature Clinical Practice Oncology.

[2]  G. Meno-Tetang,et al.  On the prediction of the human response: a recycled mechanistic pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic approach. , 2005, Basic & clinical pharmacology & toxicology.

[3]  L. Vaickus,et al.  Pharmacokinetics/Pharmacodynamics of Nondepleting Anti-CD4 Monoclonal Antibody (TRX1) in Healthy Human Volunteers , 2006, Pharmaceutical Research.

[4]  D. Bourel,et al.  Use of the DAF Assay to Assess the Functional Properties of Polyclonal and Monoclonal Rh D Antibodies , 1996, Vox sanguinis.

[5]  M. Tabrizi,et al.  Preclinical and clinical safety of monoclonal antibodies. , 2007, Drug discovery today.

[6]  Malcolm W Johnson Molecular mechanisms of β2-adrenergic receptor function, response, and regulation , 2006 .

[7]  A. Pavlou,et al.  Monoclonal antibodies market , 2004, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[8]  I. Macdougall Optimizing the use of erythropoietic agents-- pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic considerations. , 2002, Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association.

[9]  H. Lowman,et al.  Use of Quantitative Pharmacology in the Development of HAE1, a High-Affinity Anti-IgE Monoclonal Antibody , 2008, The AAPS Journal.

[10]  F. Breedveld,et al.  Regulation of cytokines, cytokine inhibitors, and acute-phase proteins following anti-TNF-alpha therapy in rheumatoid arthritis. , 1999, Journal of immunology.

[11]  A. Cohen Should we tolerate tolerability as an objective in early drug development? , 2007, British journal of clinical pharmacology.

[12]  R. Vaidya,et al.  Initial human trials with an investigational new drug (phase I and 2): planning an management. , 1981, Journal of postgraduate medicine.

[13]  P. Parren,et al.  Dual Mode of Action of a Human Anti-Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Monoclonal Antibody for Cancer Therapy , 2004, The Journal of Immunology.

[14]  C. Hsu,et al.  Anti-IgE antibodies for the treatment of IgE-mediated allergic diseases. , 2007, Advances in immunology.

[15]  M. Wadhwa,et al.  “Cytokine Storm” in the Phase I Trial of Monoclonal Antibody TGN1412: Better Understanding the Causes to Improve PreClinical Testing of Immunotherapeutics , 2007, The Journal of Immunology.

[16]  R. Hansen,et al.  Antibody pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. , 2004, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[17]  Lambertus A. Peletier,et al.  Allometric Scaling of Pharmacodynamic Responses: Application to 5-Ht1A Receptor Mediated Responses from Rat to Man , 2007, Pharmaceutical Research.

[18]  M. Mascelli,et al.  Molecular, Biologic, and Pharmacokinetic Properties of Monoclonal Antibodies: Impact of These Parameters on Early Clinical Development , 2007, Journal of clinical pharmacology.

[19]  Donald E. Mager,et al.  General Pharmacokinetic Model for Drugs Exhibiting Target-Mediated Drug Disposition , 2001, Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics.

[20]  Steven W. Martin,et al.  The role of mechanism-based pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) modelling in translational research of biologics. , 2007, Drug discovery today.

[21]  R K Jain,et al.  Biodistribution of monoclonal antibodies: scale-up from mouse to human using a physiologically based pharmacokinetic model. , 1995, Cancer research.

[22]  Joseph A. Giertych,et al.  Aseptic peritonitis due to peptidoglycan contamination of pharmacopoeia standard dialysis solution , 2005, The Lancet.

[23]  Michael S Saag,et al.  Efficacy of short-term monotherapy with maraviroc, a new CCR5 antagonist, in patients infected with HIV-1 , 2005, Nature Medicine.

[24]  B. Agoram,et al.  Development and evaluation of a population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model of darbepoetin alfa in patients with nonmyeloid malignancies undergoing multicycle chemotherapy , 2006, The AAPS Journal.

[25]  Y. Tsukamoto,et al.  A mechanism-based binding model for the population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of omalizumab. , 2007, British journal of clinical pharmacology.

[26]  Benjamin Wu,et al.  The application of mechanism-based PK/PD modeling in pharmacodynamic-based dose selection of muM17, a surrogate monoclonal antibody for efalizumab. , 2006, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[27]  B. Klein,et al.  Measurement of whole body interleukin-6 (IL-6) production: prediction of the efficacy of anti-IL-6 treatments. , 1995, Blood.

[28]  R. Sarangapani,et al.  On the anticipation of the human dose in first-in-man trials from preclinical and prior clinical information in early drug development , 2007, Xenobiotica; the fate of foreign compounds in biological systems.

[29]  Harvey F Lodish,et al.  Cellular Trafficking and Degradation of Erythropoietin and Novel Erythropoiesis Stimulating Protein (NESP)* , 2006, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[30]  N. Kruhlak,et al.  Estimating the safe starting dose in phase I clinical trials and no observed effect level based on QSAR modeling of the human maximum recommended daily dose. , 2004, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[31]  Chang-Ho Ahn,et al.  Regulatory considerations for preclinical development of anticancer drugs , 1997, Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology.

[32]  K. Blesch,et al.  Estimating the starting dose for entry into humans: principles and practice , 2002, European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology.

[33]  R. Fick,et al.  Immunotherapy approach to allergic disease. , 2000, Immunopharmacology.