Replicating the complexity of natural surfaces: technique validation and applications for biomimetics, ecology and evolution

The surfaces of animals, plants and abiotic structures are not only important for organismal survival, but they have also inspired countless biomimetic and industrial applications. Additionally, the surfaces of animals and plants exhibit an unprecedented level of diversity, and animals often move on the surface of plants. Replicating these surfaces offers a number of advantages, such as preserving a surface that is likely to degrade over time, controlling for non-structural aspects of surfaces, such as compliance and chemistry, and being able to produce large areas of a small surface. In this paper, we compare three replication techniques among a number of species of plants, a technical surface and a rock. We then use two model parameters (cross-covariance function ratio and relative topography difference) to develop a unique method for quantitatively evaluating the quality of the replication. Finally, we outline future directions that can employ highly accurate surface replications, including ecological and evolutionary studies, biomechanical experiments, industrial applications and improving haptic properties of bioinspired surfaces. The recent advances associated with surface replication and imaging technology have formed a foundation on which to incorporate surface information into biological sciences and to improve industrial and biomimetic applications. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Bioinspired materials and surfaces for green science and technology’.

[1]  Bharat Bhushan,et al.  Natural and biomimetic artificial surfaces for superhydrophobicity, self-cleaning, low adhesion, and drag reduction , 2011 .

[2]  Thomas Schimmel,et al.  The Salvinia Paradox: Superhydrophobic Surfaces with Hydrophilic Pins for Air Retention Under Water , 2010, Advanced materials.

[3]  T. Higham,et al.  Life in the flow lane: differences in pectoral fin morphology suggest transitions in station-holding demand across species of marine sculpin. , 2012, Zoology.

[4]  Adam P. Summers,et al.  Stick tight: suction adhesion on irregular surfaces in the northern clingfish , 2013, Biology Letters.

[5]  Brian Henson,et al.  Surface finish and touch: a case study in a new human factors tribology , 2004 .

[6]  Zhongfan Liu,et al.  Precise replication of antireflective nanostructures from biotemplates , 2007 .

[7]  W. Barthlott,et al.  Purity of the sacred lotus, or escape from contamination in biological surfaces , 1997, Planta.

[8]  Matthias Scherge,et al.  Structural Design and Biomechanics of Friction-Based Releasable Attachment Devices in Insects1 , 2002, Integrative and comparative biology.

[9]  Naoe Hosoda,et al.  Influence of surface roughness on gecko adhesion. , 2007, Acta biomaterialia.

[10]  Kahp Y. Suh,et al.  A biomimetic approach for effective reduction in micro-scale friction by direct replication of topography of natural water-repellent surfaces , 2007 .

[11]  G. Cox.  Biological confocal microscopy , 2002 .

[12]  Hui Zhang,et al.  Replication of Leaf Surface Structures for Light Harvesting , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[13]  David Speck,et al.  Biomimetic bio-inspired biomorph sustainable? An attempt to classify and clarify biology-derived technical developments , 2017, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[14]  S. Gorb,et al.  Physicochemical Properties of Functional Surfaces in Pitchers of the Carnivorous Plant Nepenthes alata Blanco (Nepenthaceae) , 2006, Plant biology.

[15]  D. Yao,et al.  Rapid pattern transfer of biomimetic surface structures onto thermoplastic polymers , 2007 .

[16]  Akhlesh Lakhtakia,et al.  Background and survey of bioreplication techniques , 2011, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[17]  E. Yoon,et al.  Replication of surfaces of natural leaves for enhanced micro-scale tribological property , 2007 .

[18]  W. Barthlott,et al.  Superhydrophobic Vertically Aligned Carbon Nanotubes for Biomimetic Air Retention under Water (Salvinia Effect) , 2017 .

[19]  Micro-Structured Polymer Film Mimicking the Trembling Aspen , 2013 .

[20]  Thomas Speck,et al.  Plant surfaces with cuticular folds are slippery for beetles , 2012, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[21]  D. Irschick,et al.  An intraspecific analysis of trade-offs in sprinting performance in a West Indian lizard species (Anolis lineatopus) , 1998 .

[22]  U. Steiner,et al.  Analysing photonic structures in plants , 2013, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[23]  W. Barthlott,et al.  At which surface roughness do claws cling? Investigations with larvae of the running water mayfly Epeorus assimilis (Heptageniidae, Ephemeroptera). , 2012, Zoology.

[24]  A. Russell,et al.  Between a rock and a soft place: microtopography of the locomotor substrate and the morphology of the setal fields of Namibian day geckos (Gekkota: Gekkonidae: Rhoptropus) , 2014 .

[25]  Bharat Bhushan,et al.  Plant Surfaces: Structures and Functions for Biomimetic Innovations , 2017, Nano-Micro Letters.

[26]  Ullrich Steiner,et al.  Disorder in convergent floral nanostructures enhances signalling to bees , 2017, Nature.

[27]  Timothy E. Higham,et al.  Subdigital adhesive pad morphology varies in relation to structural habitat use in the Namib Day Gecko , 2015 .

[28]  W. Barthlott,et al.  A fast, precise and low-cost replication technique for nano- and high-aspect-ratio structures of biological and artificial surfaces , 2008, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[29]  R. Klatzky,et al.  Haptic perception: A tutorial , 2009, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[30]  W. Kapłonek,et al.  ADVANCED 3D LASER MICROSCOPY FOR MEASUREMENTS AND ANALYSIS OF VITRIFIED BONDED ABRASIVE TOOLS , 2012 .

[31]  Jun-Feng Song,et al.  Topography measurements and applications , 2006, International Symposium on Precision Mechanical Measurements.

[32]  Christophe Peroz,et al.  Replication of butterfly wing and natural lotus leaf structures by nanoimprint on silica sol–gel films , 2008, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[33]  Walter Federle,et al.  The effect of surface roughness on claw and adhesive hair performance in the dock beetle Gastrophysa viridula , 2011 .

[34]  W. Barthlott,et al.  Superhydrophobic and superhydrophilic plant surfaces: an inspiration for biomimetic materials , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[35]  V. Abdala,et al.  Relationships among morphology, clinging performance and habitat use in Liolaemini lizards , 2011, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[36]  Zani.  The comparative evolution of lizard claw and toe morphology and clinging performance , 2000 .

[37]  B. Bhushan,et al.  Surface modification of silicon and polydimethylsiloxane surfaces with vapor-phase-deposited ultrathin fluorosilane films for biomedical nanodevices , 2006 .

[38]  S. Paddock.  Principles and practices of laser scanning confocal microscopy , 2000, Molecular biotechnology.

[39]  Peter Willett,et al.  What is a tutorial , 2013 .

[40]  J. Kutter,et al.  Anti-stiction coating of PDMS moulds for rapid microchannel fabrication by double replica moulding , 2011 .

[41]  Theodore V. Vorburger,et al.  Applications of surface metrology in firearm identification , 2014 .

[42]  Dong Sung Kim,et al.  Fabrication of hydrophobic films replicated from plant leaves in nature , 2006 .

[43]  A. Russell,et al.  Real-world challenges to, and capabilities of, the gekkotan adhesive system: contrasting the rough and the smooth , 2007 .

[44]  S. Gorb,et al.  Surface roughness rather than surface chemistry essentially affects insect adhesion , 2016, Beilstein journal of nanotechnology.

[45]  R. Van Damme,et al.  Evolutionary trade‐offs in locomotor capacities in lacertid lizards: are splendid sprinters clumsy climbers? , 2001, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[46]  Bharat Bhushan,et al.  Diversity of structure, morphology and wetting of plant surfaces , 2008 .

[47]  C. Neinhuis,et al.  Methanol as a rapid fixative for the investigation of plant surfaces by SEM , 1996 .

[48]  M. G. Mullins,et al.  Tissue preparation for scanning electron microscopy of fruit surfaces: Comparison of fresh and cryopreserved specimens and replicas of banana peel , 1987 .

[49]  T. Kwon,et al.  Mass-producible replication of highly hydrophobic surfaces from plant leaves , 2006 .

[50]  W. Chee,et al.  Polyvinyl siloxane impression materials: a review of properties and techniques. , 1992, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[51]  S. Gorb,et al.  The use of plant waxes as templates for micro- and nanopatterning of surfaces. , 2007, Acta biomaterialia.

[52]  W. Barthlott,et al.  Superhydrophobic hierarchically structured surfaces in biology: evolution, structural principles and biomimetic applications , 2016, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[53]  Stanislav N. Gorb,et al.  Effects of surface topography and chemistry of Rumex obtusifolius leaves on the attachment of the beetle Gastrophysa viridula , 2009 .

[54]  Thomas Speck,et al.  Functional morphology of suction discs and attachment performance of the Mediterranean medicinal leech (Hirudo verbana Carena) , 2016, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[55]  Mark Hollins,et al.  The coding of roughness. , 2007, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[56]  J. Aizenberg,et al.  Bio-Inspired Band-Gap Tunable Elastic Optical Multilayer Fibers , 2013, Advanced materials.

[57]  R. Ruibal,et al.  The structure of the digital setae of lizards , 1965, Journal of morphology.

[58]  M N Mandikos,et al.  Polyvinyl siloxane impression materials: an update on clinical use. , 1998, Australian dental journal.

[59]  W. Barthlott,et al.  Hierarchically sculptured plant surfaces and superhydrophobicity. , 2009, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[60]  W. Barthlott,et al.  Dry in the Water: The Superhydrophobic Water Fern Salvinia – a Model for Biomimetic Surfaces , 2009 .

[61]  Nacer K. M'Sirdi,et al.  Perception and characterization of materials using signal processing techniques , 2001, IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas..

[62]  S. Gorb,et al.  Investigating the efficiency of a bio-inspired insect repellent surface structure , 2018, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[63]  T. Speck,et al.  Straightforward and precise approach to replicate complex hierarchical structures from plant surfaces onto soft matter polymer , 2018, Royal Society Open Science.

[64]  W. Barthlott,et al.  Bionics and green technology in maritime shipping: an assessment of the effect of Salvinia air-layer hull coatings for drag and fuel reduction , 2018, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A.

[65]  Boxin Zhao,et al.  Superhydro-oleophobic bio-inspired polydimethylsiloxane micropillared surface via FDTS coating/blending approaches , 2015 .

[66]  Bharat Bhushan,et al.  Multifunctional surface structures of plants: An inspiration for biomimetics , 2009 .

[67]  Hendrik Bargel,et al.  Structure-function relationships of the plant cuticle and cuticular waxes - a smart material? , 2006, Functional plant biology : FPB.

[68]  Chunxiong Luo,et al.  Artificial lotus leaf by nanocasting. , 2005, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[69]  R. White,et al.  Methanol fixation of plant tissue for Scanning Electron Microscopy improves preservation of tissue morphology and dimensions , 2013, Plant Methods.

[70]  K Jiang,et al.  Fabrication of hybrid nanostructured arrays using a PDMS/PDMS replication process. , 2012, Lab on a chip.

[71]  T. Higham,et al.  Divergence in locomotor performance, ecology, and morphology between two sympatric sister species of desert-dwelling gecko , 2010 .

[72]  Thomas Speck,et al.  Process Sequences In Biomimetic Research , 2008 .

[73]  Thierry Savin,et al.  Recent advances in the biomimicry of structural colours. , 2016, Chemical Society reviews.

[74]  Jianshe Chen.  Surface Texture of Foods: Perception and Characterization , 2007, Critical reviews in food science and nutrition.

[75]  Lars Chittka,et al.  Floral Iridescence, Produced by Diffractive Optics, Acts As a Cue for Animal Pollinators , 2009, Science.

[76]  T. Speck,et al.  Impact of cell shape in hierarchically structured plant surfaces on the attachment of male Colorado potato beetles (Leptinotarsa decemlineata) , 2012, Beilstein journal of nanotechnology.

[77]  Wilhelm Barthlott,et al.  Biomimetic replicas: Transfer of complex architectures with different optical properties from plant surfaces onto technical materials. , 2009, Acta biomaterialia.

[78]  Thomas Speck,et al.  Plant surfaces with cuticular folds and their replicas: influence of microstructuring and surface chemistry on the attachment of a leaf beetle. , 2013, Acta biomaterialia.

[79]  Hendrik Bargel,et al.  Plant cuticles: Multifunctional interfaces between plant and environment , 2004 .

[80]  P. Danielsson,et al.  Three-dimensional microscopy using a confocal laser scanning microscope. , 1985, Optics letters.

[81]  T. Taylor,et al.  Application of the Scanning Electron Microscope in Paleobotany , 1968 .

[82]  M. Lawes,et al.  Fruit Ripening Signals and Cues in a Madagascan Dry Forest: Haptic Indicators Reliably Indicate Fruit Ripeness to Dichromatic Lemurs , 2016, Evolutionary Biology.

[83]  W. Benecke,et al.  Vapor-Phase Self-Assembled Monolayers for Anti-Stiction Applications in MEMS , 2007, Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems.