Network Pricing: How to Induce Optimal Flows Under Strategic Link Operators

Network pricing games provide a framework for modeling real-world settings with two types of strategic agents: owners (operators) of the network and users of the network. Owners of the network post a price for usage of the link they own so as to attract users and maximize profit; users of the network select routes based on price and level of use by other users. We point out that an equilibrium in these games may not exist, may not be unique and may induce an arbitrarily inefficient network performance. Our main result is to observe that a simple regulation on the network owners market solves all three issues above. Specifically, if an authority could set appropriate caps (upper bounds) on the tolls (prices) operators can charge, then: the game among the link operators has a unique and strong Nash equilibrium and the users' game results in a Wardrop equilibrium that achieves the optimal total delay. We call any price vector with these properties a great set of tolls. As a secondary objective, we want to compute great tolls that minimize total users' payments and we provide a linear program that does this. We obtain multiplicative approximation results compared to the optimal total users' payments for arbitrary networks with polynomial latencies of bounded degree, while in the single-commodity case we obtain a bound that only depends on the topology of the network. Lastly, we show how the same mechanism of setting appropriate caps on the allowable prices extends to the model of elastic demands.

[1]  Pramodita Sharma 2012 , 2013, Les 25 ans de l’OMC: Une rétrospective en photos.

[2]  Asuman E. Ozdaglar,et al.  Price competition with elastic traffic , 2008, Networks.

[3]  Christos H. Papadimitriou,et al.  A New Look at Selfish Routing , 2010, ICS.

[4]  Yishay Mansour,et al.  Efficient graph topologies in network routing games , 2009, Games Econ. Behav..

[5]  A. James 2010 , 2011, Philo of Alexandria: an Annotated Bibliography 2007-2016.

[6]  Éva Tardos,et al.  A network pricing game for selfish traffic , 2006, Distributed Computing.

[7]  Elliot Anshelevich,et al.  Price Competition in Networked Markets: How Do Monopolies Impact Social Welfare? , 2014, WINE.

[8]  Ioannis Caragiannis,et al.  Efficiency and Complexity of Price Competition Among Single-Product Vendors , 2015, IJCAI.

[9]  Vincenzo Bonifaci,et al.  Efficiency of Restricted Tolls in Non-atomic Network Routing Games , 2010, SAGT.

[10]  Tim Roughgarden,et al.  Selfish routing and the price of anarchy , 2005 .

[11]  Tim Roughgarden,et al.  Bertrand Competition in Networks , 2008, SAGT.

[12]  Patrice Marcotte,et al.  Network Pricing of Congestion-Free Networks: The Elastic and Linear Demand Case , 2017, Transp. Sci..

[13]  Evdokia Nikolova,et al.  The Burden of Risk Aversion in Mean-Risk Selfish Routing , 2014, EC.

[14]  J. Musacchio,et al.  The Price of Anarchy in a Network Pricing Game , 2007 .

[15]  Tim Roughgarden,et al.  Stronger Bounds on Braess's Paradox and the Maximum Latency of Selfish Routing , 2011, SIAM J. Discret. Math..

[16]  Guido Schäfer,et al.  Computing Optimal Tolls with Arc Restrictions and Heterogeneous Players , 2014, STACS.

[17]  Asuman Ozdaglar,et al.  Price competition with elastic traffic , 2008 .

[18]  Richard Cole,et al.  Pricing network edges for heterogeneous selfish users , 2003, STOC '03.

[19]  Tim Roughgarden,et al.  Bertrand competition in networks , 2008, SECO.

[20]  M. Gribaudo,et al.  2002 , 2001, Cell and Tissue Research.

[21]  Dimitris Fotakis,et al.  Improving Selfish Routing for Risk-Averse Players , 2015, Theory of Computing Systems.

[22]  Aldo González Tissinetti Controversias por reducciones en la demanda en las concesiones de carreteras en Chile , 2016 .

[23]  T. Koopmans,et al.  Studies in the Economics of Transportation. , 1956 .

[24]  Lisa Fleischer,et al.  Linear tolls suffice: New bounds and algorithms for tolls in single source networks , 2005, Theor. Comput. Sci..

[25]  Martin Hoefer,et al.  Stackelberg Network Pricing Games , 2008, Algorithmica.

[26]  Martine Labbé,et al.  Network pricing problem with unit toll , 2017, Networks.

[27]  A. C. Pigou Economics of welfare , 1920 .

[28]  C. Martin 2015 , 2015, Les 25 ans de l’OMC: Une rétrospective en photos.

[29]  J. Musacchio,et al.  The Price of Anarchy in Parallel - Serial Competition with Elastic Demand , 2009 .

[30]  Huw David Dixon Surfing economics : essays for the inquiring economist , 2001 .

[31]  Dimitris Kalimeris,et al.  Improving Selfish Routing for Risk-Averse Players , 2019, Theory of Computing Systems.

[32]  Tim Roughgarden,et al.  How bad is selfish routing? , 2002, JACM.

[33]  Florence March,et al.  2016 , 2016, Affair of the Heart.

[34]  C. Berge Topological Spaces: including a treatment of multi-valued functions , 2010 .

[35]  Asuman E. Ozdaglar,et al.  Competition in Parallel-Serial Networks , 2007, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[36]  A. Azzouz 2011 , 2020, City.

[37]  S. M. García,et al.  2014: , 2020, A Party for Lazarus.

[38]  Guido Schäfer,et al.  The Impact of Worst-Case Deviations in Non-Atomic Network Routing Games , 2016, SAGT.

[39]  Robert B. Dial,et al.  Minimal-revenue congestion pricing part I: A fast algorithm for the single-origin case , 1999 .

[40]  Marc Schröder,et al.  Toll Caps in Privatized Road Networks , 2018, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[41]  KuiteingAimé Kamgaing,et al.  Network Pricing of Congestion-Free Networks , 2017 .

[42]  P ? ? ? ? ? ? ? % ? ? ? ? , 1991 .

[43]  A. Ozdaglar,et al.  Algorithmic Game Theory: Incentives and Pricing in Communications Networks , 2007 .

[44]  Feng Niu,et al.  The price of anarchy in bertrand games , 2009, EC '09.