Implementing registration measurements on photomasks at the Nanometer Comparator

Due to the introduction of double patterning schemes in the production processes of the semiconductor industry and the corresponding stringent specifications of the placement errors of the optical images of mask features (1.2 nm (3σ)) in the lithographic projection process, significant improvements of the registration measurements on photomasks are required. The Nanometer Comparator of the PTB, a one-dimensional vacuum-interference length comparator, has already demonstrated measurement reproducibility at this level on line scales and linear encoders, and therefore this comparator should also be applied for placement metrology on photomasks. Because a photomask is a relatively thin plate which is supported almost at its ends, the bending influence is much larger than for line scales and precautions had to be taken to reduce the influence of the sample support on the measurements results. A new sample mount was built, which exhibits mechanical alignment aids. In addition the position deviations caused by the mask bending were corrected by means of finite element calculations. Measurements performed with the Nanometer Comparator on a high-quality mask showed a maximum deviation of measured feature positions from the common mean of below 0.5 nm and a reproducibility of 0.2 nm. These results suggest that the use of a one-dimensional calibration of mask measuring machines allows us to perform traceable registration measurements with sufficient accuracy.

[1]  M. Raugh Absolute two-dimensional sub-micron metrology for electron beam lithography: A calibration theory with applications☆ , 1985 .

[2]  Dirk Beyer,et al.  The evolution of pattern placement metrology for mask making , 2011, European Mask and Lithography Conference.

[3]  Christian Holfeld,et al.  EUV mask image placement management in writing, registration, and exposure tools , 2005, Photomask Japan.

[4]  Harald Bosse,et al.  An international length comparison using vacuum comparators and a photoelectric incremental encoder as transfer standard , 2008 .

[5]  Jens Fluegge,et al.  Status of the nanometer comparator at PTB , 2001, Lasers in Metrology and Art Conservation.

[6]  F. Laske,et al.  Evaluation of KLA-Tencor LMS IPRO5 beta system for 22nm node registration and overlay applications , 2011, Photomask Technology.

[7]  G. N. Makarov Laser applications in nanotechnology: nanofabrication using laser ablation and laser nanolithography , 2013 .

[8]  J. Flugge Concept of an Interferometric Length Comparator with Measurement Uncertainties in the Nanometer Range , 1999 .

[9]  Harald Bosse,et al.  A method for the in situ determination of Abbe errors and their correction , 2007 .

[10]  Harald Bosse,et al.  SUPPLEMENTARY COMPARISON: Final report on CCL-S3 supplementary line scale comparison Nano3 , 2003 .

[11]  Harald Bosse,et al.  A revised treatment of the influence of the sample support on the measurement of line scales and the consequences for its use to disseminate the unit of length , 2009 .

[12]  Richard M. Silver,et al.  Two-dimensional calibration artifact and measurement methodology , 1999, Advanced Lithography.

[13]  Klaus-Dieter Roeth,et al.  Improving registration measurement capability by defining a 2D grid standard using multiple registration measurement tools , 2010, Photomask Technology.

[14]  C. N. Berglund,et al.  An exact algorithm for self-calibration of two-dimensional precision metrology stages , 1997 .

[15]  Rainer Köning,et al.  Achievement of sub nanometer reproducibility in line scale measurements with the nanometer comparator , 2007, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[16]  A. Vijayaraghavan,et al.  Directed self-assembly of block copolymers for use in bit patterned media fabrication , 2013 .

[17]  Bojan Ačko Final report on EUROMET Key Comparison EUROMET.L-K7: Calibration of line scales , 2012 .

[18]  J. Flügge,et al.  Interferometry at the PTB Nanometer Comparator: design, status and development , 2008, Other Conferences.

[19]  J. Flügge,et al.  Development of a 1.5D reference comparator for position and straightness metrology on photomasks , 2008, Photomask Technology.

[20]  Jens Flugge,et al.  Recent activities at PTB nanometer comparator , 2003, SPIE Optics + Photonics.

[21]  Harald Bosse,et al.  Characterizing the performance of the PTB line scale interferometer by measuring photoelectric incremental encoders , 2005, SPIE Optics + Photonics.