Factors affecting piglet mortality in loose farrowing systems on commercial farms

Abstract Crating sows in farrowing systems greatly restricts their normal behaviour (e.g. movement, nest-building, leaving the nest site for defecation), which is usually justified by the assumption that piglet mortality is higher with loose-housed sows. Based on experiments showing that this is not the case, farrowing crates were banned in Switzerland in 1997, with a 10-year transitional period. Since then, many farms have introduced loose farrowing systems, enabling an analysis of risk factors for piglet mortality in crateless farrowing systems based on a large sample size. Data from a Swiss sow recording scheme (UFA2000) were analysed using generalised linear mixed-effects models with an underlying Poisson distribution. Average total piglet mortality for the years 2002 and 2003 on 99 farms (N = 12457 litters) with loose farrowing systems amounted to 1.36 liveborn piglets per litter. The number of crushed piglets was 0.64 piglets per litter, whereas the number of piglets that died for other reasons was 0.72 piglets per litter. Herd size, pen size, possibility of confinement of the sow, presence of piglet protection bars and year of data collection did not significantly influence total piglet losses, losses due to crushing and losses due to reasons other than crushing. With greater litter size at birth, significantly more losses occurred due to all reasons (total, crushed, others). Total piglet mortality and losses for reasons other than crushing were significantly higher in older sows. Losses were therefore mainly attributable to sow-related characteristics rather than to the design of the farrowing pen.

[1]  M. Herskin,et al.  Nest building and farrowing in sows: relation to the reaction pattern during stress, farrowing environment and experience , 2002 .

[2]  S. Jarvis,et al.  The effect of parity and environmental restriction on behavioural and physiological responses of pre-parturient pigs. , 2001, Applied animal behaviour science.

[3]  Barbara Kamphues Vergleich von Haltungsvarianten für die Einzelhaltung von säugenden Sauen unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Auswirkungen auf das Tierverhalten und der Wirtschaftlichkeit , 2004 .

[4]  Herman Van den Weghe,et al.  Die Bewegungsbucht für säugende Sauen , 2000 .

[5]  H. Quesnel,et al.  Influence of some sow characteristics on within-litter variation of piglet birth weight. , 2008, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[6]  Knut Egil Bøe,et al.  Relationship between postnatal piglet mortality, environmental factors and management around farrowing in herds with loose-housed, lactating sows , 2007 .

[7]  D. Fraser,et al.  Behavioural perspectives on piglet survival. , 2020, Journal of reproduction and fertility. Supplement.

[8]  Judith K. Blackshaw,et al.  Comparison of behaviour patterns of sows and litters in a farrowing crate and a farrowing pen , 1994 .

[9]  N. Keil,et al.  Piglet mortality on farms using farrowing systems with or without crates , 2007, Animal Welfare.

[10]  J. Woolliams,et al.  Book of Abstracts of the 51st Annual Meeting of the European Association for Animal Production , 2000 .

[11]  David Fraser,et al.  Crushing of piglets by sows: effects of litter features, pen features and sow behaviour , 1998 .

[12]  Donald M. Broom,et al.  A comparison of the behaviour and performance of sows and piglets in crates and oval pens , 1999 .

[13]  Damm,et al.  The effects of branches on prepartum nest building in gilts with access to straw. , 2000, Applied animal behaviour science.

[14]  P. Jensen Nest site choice and nest building of free-ranging domestic pigs due to farrow , 1989 .

[15]  C. Vieuille,et al.  Sow behaviour involved in the crushing of piglets in outdoor farrowing huts—a brief report , 2003 .

[16]  G. Cronin,et al.  A comparison of piglet production and survival in the Werribee Farrowing Pen and conventional farrowing crates at a commercial farm , 2000 .

[17]  A. Lawrence,et al.  The responsiveness of sows to their piglets in relation to the length of parturition and the involvement of endogenous opioids , 1999 .

[18]  Harold W. Gonyou,et al.  Increasing available space in a farrowing crate does not facilitate postural changes or maternal responses in gilts , 1998 .

[19]  S Corning,et al.  Timing and causes of piglet mortality in alternative and conventional farrowing systems , 2000, Veterinary Record.

[20]  David Fraser,et al.  Sow body movements that crush piglets: a comparison between two types of farrowing accommodation , 1996 .

[21]  Judith K. Blackshaw,et al.  Getting-Up and Lying-Down Behaviours of Loose- Housed Sows and Social Contacts Between Sows and Piglets During Day 1 and Day 8 After Parturition , 1990 .

[22]  E. Swierstra,et al.  CAUSES OF PIGLET DEATH FROM BIRTH TO WEANING , 1987 .

[23]  J. Svendsen Occurrence and causes of traumatic injuries in neonatal pigs , 1986 .