Monitoring and Mapping Vineyard Water Status Using Non-Invasive Technologies by a Ground Robot

There is a growing need to provide support and applicable tools to farmers and the agro-industry in order to move from their traditional water status monitoring and high-water-demand cropping and irrigation practices to modern, more precise, reduced-demand systems and technologies. In precision viticulture, very few approaches with ground robots have served as moving platforms for carrying non-invasive sensors to deliver field maps that help growers in decision making. The goal of this work is to demonstrate the capability of the VineScout (developed in the context of a H2020 EU project), a ground robot designed to assess and map vineyard water status using thermal infrared radiometry in commercial vineyards. The trials were carried out in Douro Superior (Portugal) under different irrigation treatments during seasons 2019 and 2020. Grapevines of Vitis vinifera L. Touriga Nacional were monitored at different timings of the day using leaf water potential (Ψl) as reference indicators of plant water status. Grapevines’ canopy temperature (Tc) values, recorded with an infrared radiometer, as well as data acquired with an environmental sensor (Tair, RH, and AP) and NDVI measurements collected with a multispectral sensor were automatically saved in the computer of the autonomous robot to assess and map the spatial variability of a commercial vineyard water status. Calibration and prediction models were performed using Partial Least Squares (PLS) regression. The best prediction models for grapevine water status yielded a determination coefficient of cross-validation (r2cv) of 0.57 in the morning time and a r2cv of 0.42 in the midday. The root mean square error of cross-validation (RMSEcv) was 0.191 MPa and 0.139 MPa at morning and midday, respectively. Spatial–temporal variation maps were developed at two different times of the day to illustrate the capability to monitor the grapevine water status in order to reduce the consumption of water, implementing appropriate irrigation strategies and increase the efficiency in the real time vineyard management. The promising outcomes gathered with the VineScout using different sensors based on thermography, multispectral imaging and environmental data disclose the need for further studies considering new variables related with the plant water status, and more grapevine cultivars, seasons and locations to improve the accuracy, robustness and reliability of the predictive models, in the context of precision and sustainable viticulture.

[1]  V. Alchanatis,et al.  Mapping water status based on aerial thermal imagery: comparison of methodologies for upscaling from a single leaf to commercial fields , 2017, Precision Agriculture.

[2]  R. G. Evans,et al.  Opportunities for conservation with precision irrigation , 2005 .

[3]  Juan Fernández-Novales,et al.  Vineyard water status assessment using on-the-go thermal imaging and machine learning , 2018, PloS one.

[4]  Pablo J. Zarco-Tejada,et al.  Vineyard irrigation scheduling based on airborne thermal imagery and water potential thresholds , 2016 .

[5]  J. N. Paoli,et al.  « On-the-go » multispectral imaging system to characterize the development of vineyard foliage with quantitative and qualitative vegetation indices , 2016, Precision Agriculture.

[6]  R. Bramley,et al.  Understanding variability in winegrape production systems 2. Within vineyard variation in quality over several vintages , 2005 .

[7]  S. Evett,et al.  Canopy temperature based system effectively schedules and controls center pivot irrigation of cotton , 2010 .

[8]  B. Tisseyre,et al.  The potential of high spatial resolution information to define within-vineyard zones related to vine water status , 2008, Precision Agriculture.

[9]  José Ramón Rodríguez-Pérez,et al.  Spectroscopic estimation of leaf water content in commercial vineyards using continuum removal and partial least squares regression , 2015 .

[10]  Manfred Stoll,et al.  Use of infrared thermography for monitoring stomatal closure in the field: application to grapevine. , 2002, Journal of experimental botany.

[11]  Samuel Ortega-Farías,et al.  Effects of grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) water status on water consumption, vegetative growth and grape quality: An irrigation scheduling application to achieve regulated deficit irrigation , 2010 .

[12]  Iván Francisco García-Tejero,et al.  Thermal imaging at plant level to assess the crop-water status in almond trees (cv. Guara) under deficit irrigation strategies , 2018, Agricultural Water Management.

[13]  Rafael Poyatos,et al.  A new look at water transport regulation in plants. , 2014, The New phytologist.

[14]  M. Meron,et al.  Evaluation of different approaches for estimating and mapping crop water status in cotton with thermal imaging , 2010, Precision Agriculture.

[15]  B. Kowalski,et al.  Partial least-squares regression: a tutorial , 1986 .

[16]  J. A. Millen,et al.  CORN CANOPY TEMPERATURES MEASURED WITH A MOVING INFRARED THERMOMETER ARRAY , 2002 .

[17]  J. Peñuelas,et al.  Estimation of plant water concentration by the reflectance Water Index WI (R900/R970) , 1997 .

[18]  W. Maes,et al.  Estimating evapotranspiration and drought stress with ground-based thermal remote sensing in agriculture: a review. , 2012, Journal of experimental botany.

[19]  Javier Tardáguila,et al.  Thermal imaging to detect spatial and temporal variation in the water status of grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) , 2016 .

[20]  Sylvain Delzon,et al.  Nighttime transpiration represents a negligible part of water loss and does not increase the risk of water stress in grapevine , 2020, Plant, cell & environment.

[21]  J. E. Ayars,et al.  Grapevine water use and the crop coefficient are linear functions of the shaded area measured beneath the canopy , 2005 .

[22]  J. Girona,et al.  The use of midday leaf water potential for scheduling deficit irrigation in vineyards , 2005, Irrigation Science.

[23]  Paul R. Petrie,et al.  The accuracy and utility of a low cost thermal camera and smartphone-based system to assess grapevine water status , 2019, Biosystems Engineering.

[24]  J. Baluja,et al.  Assessment of vineyard water status variability by thermal and multispectral imagery using an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) , 2012, Irrigation Science.

[25]  J. M. Costa,et al.  Canopy and soil thermal patterns to support water and heat stress management in vineyards , 2019, Agricultural Water Management.

[26]  Brian N. Bailey,et al.  Modeling of reference temperatures for calculating crop water stress indices from infrared thermography , 2020 .

[27]  Carlos Lopes,et al.  Thermal data to monitor crop-water status in irrigated Mediterranean viticulture , 2016 .

[28]  Marco Mora,et al.  Performance Assessment of Thermal Infrared Cameras of Different Resolutions to Estimate Tree Water Status from Two Cherry Cultivars: An Alternative to Midday Stem Water Potential and Stomatal Conductance , 2020, Sensors.

[29]  S. Idso,et al.  Normalizing the stress-degree-day parameter for environmental variability☆ , 1981 .

[30]  Francisco Rovira-Más,et al.  From Smart Farming towards Agriculture 5.0: A Review on Crop Data Management , 2020, Agronomy.

[31]  Pablo J. Zarco-Tejada,et al.  Almond tree canopy temperature reveals intra-crown variability that is water stress-dependent , 2012 .

[32]  Pierre Roumet,et al.  Assessing leaf nitrogen content and leaf mass per unit area of wheat in the field throughout plant cycle with a portable spectrometer , 2013 .

[33]  Luis G. Santesteban,et al.  Response of grapevine cv. Syrah to irrigation frequency and water distribution pattern in a clay soil , 2015 .

[34]  H. Jones.  Irrigation scheduling: advantages and pitfalls of plant-based methods. , 2004, Journal of experimental botany.

[35]  R. Shanmugapriya,et al.  Agricultural Robotics , 2018 .

[36]  Vinay Pagay,et al.  Comparing Hydraulics Between Two Grapevine Cultivars Reveals Differences in Stomatal Regulation Under Water Stress and Exogenous ABA Applications , 2020, Frontiers in Plant Science.

[37]  Brian N. Bailey,et al.  Sensitivity analysis of four crop water stress indices to ambient environmental conditions and stomatal conductance , 2020, Scientia Horticulturae.

[38]  Yafit Cohen,et al.  Evaluating water stress in irrigated olives: correlation of soil water status, tree water status, and thermal imagery , 2009, Irrigation Science.

[39]  Paul D. Colaizzi,et al.  Dynamic prescription maps for site-specific variable rate irrigation of cotton , 2015 .

[40]  Heiner Kuhlmann,et al.  Towards Automated Large-Scale 3D Phenotyping of Vineyards under Field Conditions , 2016, Sensors.

[41]  Pablo J. Zarco-Tejada,et al.  Normalization of the crop water stress index to assess the within-field spatial variability of water stress sensitivity , 2020 .

[42]  R. Bramley,et al.  Understanding variability in winegrape production systems , 2004 .

[43]  Benjamin Bois,et al.  Vine water status is a key factor in grape ripening and vintage quality for red Bordeaux wine. How can it be assessed for vineyard management purposes , 2009 .

[44]  J. A. Schell,et al.  Monitoring vegetation systems in the great plains with ERTS , 1973 .

[45]  Larry E. Williams,et al.  Leaf water potentials of sunlit and/or shaded grapevine leaves are sensitive alternatives to stem water potential , 2012 .

[46]  Meng Liu,et al.  Recognition method of thermal infrared images of plant canopies based on the characteristic registration of heterogeneous images , 2020, Comput. Electron. Agric..

[47]  G. Piccinni,et al.  Remote sensing of biotic and abiotic stress for irrigation management of cotton , 2007 .

[48]  Matthew Bardeen,et al.  Selecting Canopy Zones and Thresholding Approaches to Assess Grapevine Water Status by Using Aerial and Ground-Based Thermal Imaging , 2016, Remote. Sens..