The time course of stimulus expectation in a saccadic decision task.

Because the time to respond to a stimulus depend markedly on expectation, measurements of reaction time can, conversely, provide information about the brain's estimate of the probability of a stimulus. Previous studies have shown that the quantitative relationship between reaction time and static, long-term expectation or prior probability can be explained economically by the LATER model of decision reaction time. What is not known, however, is how the neural representation of expectation changes in the short term, as a result of immediate cues. Here, we manipulate the foreperiod-the delay between the start of a trial and the appearance of the stimulus-to see how saccadic latency, and thus expectation, varies with different delays. It appears that LATER can provide a quantitative explanation of this relationship, in terms both of average latencies and of their statistical distribution. We also show that expectancy appears to be subject to a process of low-pass filtering, analogous to the spatial blur that degrades visual acuity.

[1]  H. Woodrow,et al.  The reproduction of temporal intervals. , 1930 .

[2]  M. Shadlen,et al.  A representation of the hazard rate of elapsed time in macaque area LIP , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[3]  C. Gallistel,et al.  Time, rate, and conditioning. , 2000, Psychological review.

[4]  J. Requin,et al.  Effects of a Timing Signal on Simple Reaction Time with a Rectangular Distribution of Foreperiods , 1973 .

[5]  E. Buckolz,et al.  The relationship between estimates of foreperiod duration and simple time reaction. , 1978, Journal of Motor Behavior.

[6]  Beate Hermelin,et al.  Effects of Variation in the Warning Signal on Reaction Times of Severe Subnormals , 1964 .

[7]  L. Karlin.  Reaction time as a function of foreperiod duration and variability. , 1959, Journal of experimental psychology.

[8]  B A J Reddi,et al.  Accuracy, information, and response time in a saccadic decision task. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  R H S Carpenter,et al.  Changes in expectation consequent on experience, modeled by a simple, forgetful neural circuit. , 2006, Journal of vision.

[10]  E. A. Thomas.  Reaction-time studies: the anticipation and interaction of responses. , 1967, The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology.

[11]  T. Bayes.  An essay towards solving a problem in the doctrine of chances , 2003 .

[12]  Alick Elithorn,et al.  Central Inhibition—Some Refractory Observations , 1955 .

[13]  P. J. Foley.  The foreperiod and simple reaction time. , 1959, Canadian journal of psychology.

[14]  R. H. S. Carpenter,et al.  Neural computation of log likelihood in control of saccadic eye movements , 1995, Nature.

[15]  P. Bertelson.  Central Intermittency Twenty Years Later * , 1966, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[16]  Michele A. Basso,et al.  Modulation of neuronal activity by target uncertainty , 1997, Nature.

[17]  R. Carpenter,et al.  The influence of urgency on decision time , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[18]  C. Gallistel,et al.  Toward a neurobiology of temporal cognition: advances and challenges , 1997, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[19]  R. Duncan Luce,et al.  Response Times: Their Role in Inferring Elementary Mental Organization , 1986 .

[20]  R. Church,et al.  Representation of time , 1990, Cognition.

[21]  R H S Carpenter,et al.  Task switching as a two-stage decision process. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[22]  M. Shadlen,et al.  Representation of Time by Neurons in the Posterior Parietal Cortex of the Macaque , 2003, Neuron.

[23]  L. Avant,et al.  Response Latency with Constant and Variable Interval Schedules , 1965, Perceptual and motor skills.

[24]  D. F. Fisher,et al.  Eye movements : cognition and visual perception , 1982 .

[25]  R Näätänen,et al.  The diminishing time-uncertainty with the lapse of time after the warning signal in reaction-time experiments with varying fore-periods. , 1970, Acta psychologica.

[26]  A. Kolmogoroff.  Confidence Limits for an Unknown Distribution Function , 1941 .

[27]  Risto Näätänen,et al.  Non-aging fore-periods and simple reaction time , 1971 .

[28]  J. Schall.  On building a bridge between brain and behavior. , 2004, Annual review of psychology.

[29]  L. Karlin.  Development of readiness to respond during short foreperiods. , 1966, Journal of experimental psychology.

[30]  Raymond S. Nickerson,et al.  Response times with nonaging foreperiods , 1969 .

[31]  William Kruskal,et al.  A Nonparametric test for the Several Sample Problem , 1952 .

[32]  A. Baumeister,et al.  Interactive effects on reaction time of preparatory interval length and preparatory interval frequency , 1969 .

[33]  Michael L. Platt,et al.  Neural correlates of decision variables in parietal cortex , 1999, Nature.

[34]  Samuel M. Bower,et al.  The effects of brief variable foreperiods on simple reaction time , 1989 .

[35]  H. Woodrow.  The measurement of attention , 1914 .