The prognostic role of electrocardiographic left ventricular mass assessment for identifying PCI-treated patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction at high risk of unfavourable outcome.

BACKGROUND In prognostic terms, evaluation of an ECG recording in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) appears to be inferior to echocardiographic (ECHO) assessment of left ventricular remodelling and the activities of cardiac enzymes and certain hormones. It was our hypothesis that, in the era of interventional treatment of AMI, some ECG parameters are still valid for the purpose of risk stratification. METHODS A total of 66 consecutive patients with AMI (43 male and 23 female, with a mean age of 61 +/- 11 years) were treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). In each patient ECG and ECHO examinations were performed within 5-7 days of admission for the detection of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH). In further analysis the following ECG- based LVH parameters were taken into consideration: Sokolov-Lyon voltage duration (SLVd), Cornell voltage duration CVd), 12-lead QRS voltage duration (12QRSVd), their product with QRS duration and an ECG index of left ventricular mass (LVMI(ECG)). Patients were followed for 6 months. The combined end-point included death, infarction, a need for prompt coronary intervention and hospitalization for heart failure. RESULTS The combined end-point was observed in 16 patients (24.2%). Survival analysis revealed that the most important prognostic factors were associated with a prolongation of the QRS duration. Increased SLVd was found in 43% of the patients with events compared to 14% in those without them (p < 0.01), CVd in 43% vs. 12% (p < 0.05), 12QRSVd in 81% vs. 44% (p < 0.05) and LVMI(ECG) in 75% vs. 26%, p < 0.001). There was no evidence for a difference in Cornell voltage. Univariate logistic regression indicated a 4-fold to 8-fold increase in the risk of events associated with abnormal SLV, SLVd or LVMI(ECG). Multivariate Cox analysis showed that the LVH presence in the ECG, defined as an increased SLVd product or increased LVMI(ECG), was an independent predictor of cardiovascular events after AMI. CONCLUSIONS In the era of interventional treatment of AMI, the ECG features of left ventricular hypertrophy carry independent significant prognostic information. (Cardiol J 2007; 14: 347-354).

[1]  C. Helmers,et al.  QTc intervals at discharge after acute myocardial infarction and long-term prognosis. , 2009, Acta medica Scandinavica.

[2]  B. Brendorp,et al.  Differential prognostic importance of QRS duration in heart failure and acute myocardial infarction associated with left ventricular dysfunction , 2007, European journal of heart failure.

[3]  E. W. Hancock,et al.  Recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram: part I: The electrocardiogram and its technology: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; the American College of Car , 2007, Circulation.

[4]  J. Yoshikawa,et al.  QT dispersion and left ventricular function after stent placement in acute myocardial infarction. , 2006, International journal of cardiology.

[5]  S. Solomon,et al.  Association of QRS duration and outcomes after myocardial infarction: the VALIANT trial. , 2006, Heart rhythm.

[6]  G. Schmidt,et al.  QRS duration and late mortality in unselected post-infarction patients of the revascularization era. , 2006, European heart journal.

[7]  M. Tendera,et al.  Left ventricular mass and hypertrophy assessment by means of the QRS complex voltage-independent measurements. , 2006, International journal of cardiology.

[8]  L. Pierard,et al.  Persistent negative T waves in the infarct-related leads as an independent predictor of poor long-term prognosis after acute myocardial infarction. , 2002, The American journal of cardiology.

[9]  B. Gersh,et al.  Usefulness of QRS duration in the absence of bundle branch block as an early predictor of survival in non-ST elevation acute myocardial infarction. , 2002, The American journal of cardiology.

[10]  D. Freimark,et al.  Outcome of patients with electrocardiographic evidence of left ventricular hypertrophy following thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. , 2001, The American journal of cardiology.

[11]  P. Okin,et al.  Prognostic implications of left ventricular hypertrophy. , 2001, American heart journal.

[12]  E. Carluccio,et al.  Prognostic value of left ventricular hypertrophy and geometry in patients with a first, uncomplicated myocardial infarction. , 2000, International journal of cardiology.

[13]  R. Califf,et al.  Prognostic implications of TIMI flow grade in the infarct related artery compared with continuous 12-lead ST-segment resolution analysis. Reexamining the "gold standard" for myocardial reperfusion assessment. , 2000, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[14]  C. Vrints,et al.  Determinants and prognostic implications of persistent ST-segment elevation after primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction: importance of microvascular reperfusion injury on clinical outcome. , 1999, Circulation.

[15]  M. Yotsukura,et al.  Prognosis following acute myocardial infarction in patients with ECG evidence of left ventricular hypertrophy prior to infarction. , 1998, Journal of electrocardiology.

[16]  P Kligfield,et al.  Electrocardiographic detection of left ventricular hypertrophy by the simple QRS voltage-duration product. , 1992, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[17]  U. Goldbourt,et al.  Long-term prognosis after acute myocardial infarction in patients with left ventricular hypertrophy on the electrocardiogram☆ , 1992 .

[18]  L. R. Padial.  Usefulness of total 12-lead QRS voltage for determining the presence of left ventricular hypertrophy in systemic hypertension. , 1991, The American journal of cardiology.

[19]  D. Levy,et al.  Prognostic significance of the electrocardiogram after Q wave myocardial infarction. The Framingham Study. , 1990, Circulation.

[20]  R. Kleiger,et al.  Clinical significance and prognostic importance of left ventricular hypertrophy in non-Q-wave acute myocardial infarction. , 1988, The American journal of cardiology.

[21]  N. Reichek,et al.  Echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular hypertrophy: comparison to necropsy findings. , 1986, The American journal of cardiology.

[22]  W. Shen,et al.  The QRS scoring system for estimating myocardial infarct size: clinical, angiographic and prognostic correlations. , 1983, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[23]  F. Harrell,et al.  A QRS scoring system for assessing left ventricular function after myocardial infarction. , 1982, The New England journal of medicine.

[24]  P. Siltanen,et al.  The prognostic value of the P wave morphology in the discharge ECG in a 5-year follow-up study after myocardial infarction. , 1979, American heart journal.

[25]  A. DeMaria,et al.  Recommendations Regarding Quantitation in M-Mode Echocardiography: Results of a Survey of Echocardiographic Measurements , 1978, Circulation.

[26]  E. H. Estes,et al.  A point-score system for the ECG diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy. , 1968, American heart journal.

[27]  O. Pahlm,et al.  Left ventricular mass by 12-lead electrocardiogram in healthy subjects: comparison to cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. , 2006, Journal of electrocardiology.

[28]  G. Lamas,et al.  ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction--executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 1999 Guidelines for the Management of Patients Wi , 2004, The Canadian journal of cardiology.

[29]  J. Herlitz,et al.  The relationship between electrocardiographic changes and early mortality rate in acute myocardial infarction. , 1984, Journal of electrocardiology.