Where Are They Now?: Revisiting Energy Use Feedback a Decade After Deployment

In home displays (IHD's) of energy use offers potential to engage households with energy use and improve energy literacy. Yet explorations of use over longer time periods are lacking. Based on qualitative in-home interviews with 19 participants, this research provides accounts from owners of IHD's up to 10 years after their initial deployment. Findings indicate the near complete abandonment of the devices and participants' reflections exemplify the short-lived value provided by simple cent-a-meter IHD's. The paper reflects on IHD's as a component of broadscale energy literacy programs, closing with suggestions for how designers might re-frame energy engagement as a service.

[1]  Sean A. Munson,et al.  Beyond Abandonment to Next Steps: Understanding and Designing for Life after Personal Informatics Tool Use , 2016, CHI.

[2]  Yolande Strengers,et al.  Smart Energy Technologies in Everyday Life , 2013 .

[3]  P. Wesley Schultz,et al.  Using in-home displays to provide smart meter feedback about household electricity consumption: A randomized control trial comparing kilowatts, cost, and social norms , 2015 .

[4]  J. R. Aguero,et al.  Sharing the Ride of Power: Understanding Transactive Energy in the Ecosystem of Energy Economics , 2016, IEEE Power and Energy Magazine.

[5]  Sarah Royston,et al.  Smart energy technologies in everyday life: smart Utopia? , 2014, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[6]  Panagiotis Petridis,et al.  Sensors, sense-making and sensitivities: UK household experiences with a feedback display on energy consumption and indoor environmental conditions , 2019, Energy Research & Social Science.

[7]  Corinna Fischer Feedback on household electricity consumption: a tool for saving energy? , 2008 .

[8]  Margot Brereton,et al.  Curiosity to cupboard: self reported disengagement with energy use feedback over time , 2013, OZCHI.

[9]  J. Thøgersen,et al.  Feedback on Household Electricity Consumption: Learning and Social Influence Processes , 2011 .

[10]  Riccardo Russo,et al.  Feeding back about eco-feedback: How do consumers use and respond to energy monitors? , 2014 .

[11]  Riccardo Russo,et al.  The question of energy reduction: The problem(s) with feedback , 2015 .

[12]  Tom Hargreaves Beyond energy feedback , 2018 .

[13]  Matthew Chalmers,et al.  Personal tracking as lived informatics , 2014, CHI.

[14]  Mark W. Newman,et al.  Fostering Engagement with Personal Informatics Systems , 2016, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[15]  Margot Brereton,et al.  When an eco-feedback system joins the family , 2015, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[16]  James A. Landay,et al.  The design of eco-feedback technology , 2010, CHI.

[17]  William W. Gaver,et al.  Indoor weather stations: investigating a ludic approach to environmental HCI through batch prototyping , 2013, CHI.

[18]  Michael Nye,et al.  Keeping energy visible? Exploring how householders interact with feedback from smart energy monitors in the longer term , 2013 .

[19]  A. Nilsson,et al.  Effects of continuous feedback on households’ electricity consumption: Potentials and barriers , 2014 .

[20]  Jing Lin,et al.  Longitudinal assessment of the behavior-changing effect of app-based eco-feedback in residential buildings , 2018 .

[21]  Mahmoud Alahmad,et al.  A Comparative Study of Three Feedback Devices for Residential Real-Time Energy Monitoring , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[22]  Abhay Gupta,et al.  Is disaggregation the holy grail of energy efficiency? The case of electricity , 2013 .