Reduction of lift-off effect in high-frequency apparent eddy current conductivity spectroscopy

Eddy current spectroscopy is capable of mapping conductivities and thicknesses of layered structures due to its frequency-dependent penetration depth. High-frequency apparent eddy current conductivity (AECC) spectroscopy applications typically mandate covering a frequency range beyond 10 MHz to capture depth-dependent conductivity profiles. Following the standard four-point linear system calibration method beyond 10 MHz makes it difficult to achieve accurate AECC measurements due to spurious self- and stray-capacitive effects where complex eddy current coil impedance variation with lift-off becomes more nonlinear. In this study, two different approaches are presented to reduce AECC measurement sensitivity to lift-off. First, a nonlinear lift-off correction is developed as a function of measured apparent eddy current lift-off. Second, a semi-quadratic system calibration is developed to capture the lift-off curvature as a function of frequency and hence minimizes the measurement sensitivity to lift-off variations. Presented calibration techniques allow more robust AECC measurements up to 80–100 MHz with one-order of magnitude improvement in accuracy in comparison to the use of standard four-point linear system calibration in a lift-off range of ±25.4 µm.

[1]  M. S. Safizadeh,et al.  Pulsed eddy current and ultrasonic data fusion applied to stress measurement , 2014 .

[2]  C. Lee,et al.  Conductivity profile determination by eddy current for shot-peened superalloy surfaces toward residual stress assessment , 2007 .

[3]  W. E. Deeds,et al.  Alternating Current Distribution Between Planar Conductors , 1970 .

[4]  Erol Uzal,et al.  Thickness and conductivity of metallic layers from eddy current measurements , 1992 .

[5]  Wuliang Yin,et al.  A multi-frequency impedance analysing instrument for eddy current testing , 2006 .

[6]  Leszek Dziczkowski,et al.  Elimination of Coil Liftoff From Eddy Current Measurements of Conductivity , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[7]  N. J. Goldfine Magnetometers for improved materials characterization in aerospace applications , 1993 .

[8]  Peter B. Nagy,et al.  Lift-off effect in high-frequency eddy current conductivity spectroscopy , 2007 .

[9]  P. Nagy,et al.  Simple analytical approximations for eddy current profiling of the near-surface residual stress in shot-peened metals , 2004 .

[10]  Yonggang Meng,et al.  Improvement of sensitivity of eddy current sensors for nano-scale thickness measurement of Cu films , 2014 .

[11]  Peter B. Nagy,et al.  High-frequency eddy current conductivity spectroscopy for residual stress profiling in surface-treated nickel-base superalloys , 2007 .

[12]  P. Nagy,et al.  Eddy Current Assessment of Near-Surface Residual Stress in Shot-Peened Nickel-Base Superalloys , 2004 .

[13]  Peter B. Nagy,et al.  Eddy current residual stress profiling in surface-treated engine alloys , 2009 .

[14]  P. Nagy,et al.  RECENT IMPROVEMENTS IN HIGH‐FREQUENCY EDDY CURRENT CONDUCTIVITY SPECTROSCOPY , 2008 .

[15]  Bassam A. Abu-Nabah,et al.  Metallic coating thickness assessment over nonmagnetic metals using apparent eddy current conductivity spectroscopy , 2017 .

[16]  R. J. Ditchburn,et al.  Planar rectangular spiral coils in eddy-current non-destructive inspection , 2005 .

[17]  Y. Shen,et al.  A High‐Frequency Eddy Current Inspection System and Its Application to the Residual Stress Characterization , 2006 .

[18]  Octavian Postolache,et al.  Liftoff Correction Based on the Spatial Spectral Behavior of Eddy-Current Images , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[19]  C. Dodd,et al.  ANALYTICAL SOLUTIONS TO EDDY--CURRENT PROBE COIL PROBLEMS. , 1968 .