Trade Intensity and Business Cycle Synchronization: Are Developing Countries Any Different?

Some key criteria in the optimal currency area literature are that countries should join a currency union if they have closer international trade links and more symmetric business cycles. However, both criteria are endogenous. Frankel and Rose (1998) find that trade intensity increases cycle correlation among industrial countries. We study whether the same result holds true for the case of developing countries, as their different patterns of international trade and specialization may lead to cyclical asymmetries among them and between industrial and developing countries. We gather annual information for 147 countries for 1960-99 (33,676 country pairs) and find: (i) countries with higher bilateral trade exhibit higher business cycle synchronization, with an increase of one standard deviation in bilateral trade intensity raising the output correlation from 0. 05 to 0. 09 for all country pairs; (ii) countries with more asymmetric structures of production exhibit a smaller business cycle correlation; (iii) the impact of trade integration on business cycles is higher for industrial countries than both developing and industrial-developing country pairs; (iv) a one standard deviation increase in bilateral trade intensity leads to surges in output correlation from 0. 25 to 0. 39 among industrial countries, from 0. 08 to 0. 10 for our sample of industrial-developing country pairs, and from 0. 03 to 0. 06 among developing countries; (v) the impact of trade intensity on cycle correlation is smaller the greater the production structure asymmetries between the countries.

[1]  Alan C. Stockman.  Sectoral and National Aggregate Disturbances to Industrial Output in Seven European Countries , 1987 .

[2]  Economic integration, industrial specialization, and the asymmetry of macroeconomic fluctuations , 2001 .

[3]  David Hummels,et al.  The Nature and Growth of Vertical Specialization in World Trade , 1999 .

[4]  Kei-Mu Yi,et al.  Can world real interest rates explain business cycles in a small open economy , 2001 .

[5]  Barry Eichengreen,et al.  Exchange Rate Volatility and Intervention: Implications of the Theory of Optimum Currency Areas , 1998 .

[6]  Jean Imbs.  Trade, Finance, Specialization and Synchronization , 2003 .

[7]  C. Demetriou.  Economic and monetary union in Europe , 1994 .

[8]  A. Rose,et al.  Is EMU more justifiable ex post than ex ante? European Economic Review 41 , 1997 .

[9]  National Borders, Trade and Migration , 1997 .

[10]  M. Ayhan Kose,et al.  International Trade and Business Cycles: Is Vertical Specialization the Missing Link? , 2001 .

[11]  John F. Helliwell,et al.  How Much Do National Borders Matter , 1998 .

[12]  T. Persson.  Currency unions and trade: how large is the treatment effect? , 2001 .

[13]  Kei-Mu Yi,et al.  Can Vertical Specialization Explain the Growth of World Trade? , 2000, Journal of Political Economy.

[14]  Evidence of the North--South business cycle , 2001 .

[15]  Michael A. Kouparitsas.  North-South business cycles , 1996 .

[16]  John Mccallum,et al.  National Borders Matter: Canada-U.S. Regional Trade Patterns , 1995 .

[17]  P. Krugman.  Geography and Trade , 1992 .

[18]  D. Romer,et al.  Does Trade Cause Growth , 1999 .

[19]  Michel A. Robe,et al.  Foreign Aid And The Business Cycle , 2001 .

[20]  Todd E. Clark,et al.  Borders and Business Cycles , 1999 .

[21]  Norman Loayza,et al.  Comovements and Sectoral Interdependence: Evidence for Latin America, East Asia, and Europe , 2001 .

[22]  H. Grubel,et al.  Intra-industry trade: The theory and measurement of international trade in differentiated products , 1975 .

[23]  Todd E. Clark.  Business cycle fluctuations in U.S. regions and industries: the roles of national, region-specific, and industry-specific shocks , 1992 .

[24]  Michael A. Kouparitsas.  Is the EMU a viable common currency area? a VAR analysis of regional business cycles , 1999 .

[25]  Barry Eichengreen,et al.  Ever Closer to Heaven? An Optimum-Currency-Area Index for European Countries , 1996 .

[26]  Harald Uhlig,et al.  Does a Currency Union affect Trade? The Time Series Evidence Reuven Glick and Andrew K. Rose* , 2002 .

[27]  Bruno van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie,et al.  International R&D spillovers: A comment , 1998 .

[28]  S. Wei.  Intra-National Versus International Trade: How Stubborn are Nations in Global Integration? , 1996 .

[29]  Hélène Rey,et al.  Information and capital flows: The determinants of transactions in financial assets , 2001 .

[30]  A. Rose.  One Money, One Market: Estimating the Effect of Common Currencies on Trade , 1999 .

[31]  Silvana Tenreyro.  On The Causes and Consequences of Currency Unions , 2002 .

[32]  A. Rose,et al.  Contagion and Trade: Why Are Currency Crises Regional? , 1998 .

[33]  R. Mundell.  A Theory of Optimum Currency Areas , 1961 .

[34]  James E. Anderson,et al.  Gravity with Gravitas: A Solution to the Border Puzzle , 2001 .

[35]  M. Kawai.  Optimum Currency Areas , 1991 .

[36]  M. Kose.  Explaining Business Cycles in Small Open Economies: How Much Do World Prices Matter? , 2002 .

[37]  A. Rose,et al.  The Endogeneity of the Optimum Currency Area Criteria , 1996 .

[38]  Antonio Fatás.  EMU: Countries or regions? Lessons from the EMS experience , 1997 .

[39]  Marianne Baxter,et al.  What Causes Fluctuations in the Terms of Trade? , 2000 .

[40]  Jeffrey A. Frankel,et al.  The Regionalization Of The World Economy , 1997 .

[41]  Vance L. Martin,et al.  International business cycles and financial integration , 1995 .

[42]  Elhanan Helpman,et al.  International R&D spillovers , 1995 .

[43]  J. Stock,et al.  Business Cycle Fluctuations in U.S. Macroeconomic Time Series , 1998 .

[44]  A. Rose,et al.  An Estimate of the Effect of Common Currencies on Trade and Income , 2001 .

[45]  Hélène Rey,et al.  Financial Integration and Asset Returns , 1999 .

[46]  Marianne Baxter,et al.  Measuring Business Cycles: Approximate Band-Pass Filters for Economic Time Series , 1995, Review of Economics and Statistics.