Spatial and temporal control of cell aggregation efficiently directs human pluripotent stem cells towards neural commitment.

3D suspension culture is generally considered a promising method to achieve efficient expansion and controlled differentiation of human pluripotent stem cells (hPSCs). In this work, we focused on developing an integrated culture platform for expansion and neural commitment of hPSCs into neural precursors using 3D suspension conditions and chemically-defined culture media. We evaluated different inoculation methodologies for hPSC expansion as 3D aggregates and characterized the resulting cultures in terms of aggregate size distribution. It was demonstrated that upon single-cell inoculation, after four days of culture, 3D aggregates were composed of homogenous populations of hPSC and were characterized by an average diameter of 139 ± 26 μm, which was determined to be the optimal size to initiate neural commitment. Temporal analysis revealed that upon neural specification it is possible to maximize the percentage of neural precursor cells expressing the neural markers Sox1 and Pax6 after nine days of culture. These results highlight our ability to define a robust method for production of hPSC-derived neural precursors that minimizes processing steps and that constitutes a promising alternative to the traditional planar adherent culture system due to a high potential for scaling-up.

[1]  C. Mummery,et al.  Regulation of human embryonic stem cell differentiation by BMP-2 and its antagonist noggin , 2004, Journal of Cell Science.

[2]  Fred H. Gage,et al.  Modeling Hippocampal Neurogenesis Using Human Pluripotent Stem Cells , 2014, Stem cell reports.

[3]  M. Götz,et al.  Molecular dissection of Pax6 function: the specific roles of the paired domain and homeodomain in brain development , 2004, Development.

[4]  A. G. Fadeev,et al.  Synthetic peptide-acrylate surfaces for long-term self-renewal and cardiomyocyte differentiation of human embryonic stem cells , 2010, Nature Biotechnology.

[5]  O. Brüstle,et al.  A rosette-type, self-renewing human ES cell-derived neural stem cell with potential for in vitro instruction and synaptic integration , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  Todd C McDevitt,et al.  The multiparametric effects of hydrodynamic environments on stem cell culture. , 2011, Tissue engineering. Part B, Reviews.

[7]  Marius Wernig,et al.  In vitro differentiation of transplantable neural precursors from human embryonic stem cells , 2001, Nature Biotechnology.

[8]  Vincent C. Chen,et al.  Scalable GMP compliant suspension culture system for human ES cells. , 2012, Stem cell research.

[9]  L. V. Van Laake,et al.  Recombinant Vitronectin Is a Functionally Defined Substrate That Supports Human Embryonic Stem Cell Self‐Renewal via αVβ5 Integrin , 2008, Stem cells.

[10]  P. Zandstra,et al.  Reproducible, Ultra High-Throughput Formation of Multicellular Organization from Single Cell Suspension-Derived Human Embryonic Stem Cell Aggregates , 2008, PloS one.

[11]  V. Bolshakov,et al.  ES cell-derived renewable and functional midbrain dopaminergic progenitors , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  V. Tabar,et al.  Derivation of midbrain dopamine neurons from human embryonic stem cells. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  Maria Margarida Diogo,et al.  Stem cell cultivation in bioreactors. , 2011, Biotechnology advances.

[14]  Kumaraswamy Nanthakumar,et al.  Geometric control of cardiomyogenic induction in human pluripotent stem cells. , 2011, Tissue engineering. Part A.

[15]  Thomas Scheper,et al.  Long term expansion of undifferentiated human iPS and ES cells in suspension culture using a defined medium. , 2010, Stem cell research.

[16]  R. S. Goldstein,et al.  Derivation of neural precursors from human embryonic stem cells in the presence of noggin , 2005, Molecular and Cellular Neuroscience.

[17]  Lauren I. Siniscalchi,et al.  Passaging and colony expansion of human pluripotent stem cells by enzyme-free dissociation in chemically defined culture conditions , 2012, Nature Protocols.

[18]  Pei Su,et al.  High‐Efficiency Induction of Neural Conversion in Human ESCs and Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells with a Single Chemical Inhibitor of Transforming Growth Factor Beta Superfamily Receptors , 2010, Stem cells.

[19]  Tiago G Fernandes,et al.  Stem cell bioprocessing for regenerative medicine , 2014 .

[20]  J. Blake,et al.  Pax genes: regulators of lineage specification and progenitor cell maintenance , 2014, Development.

[21]  Peter Kirwan,et al.  Human cerebral cortex development from pluripotent stem cells to functional excitatory synapses , 2012, Nature Neuroscience.

[22]  M. Gassmann,et al.  Oxygen supply and oxygen-dependent gene expression in differentiating embryonic stem cells. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  Hoon-Chul Kang,et al.  Highly Pure and Expandable PSA-NCAM-Positive Neural Precursors from Human ESC and iPSC-Derived Neural Rosettes , 2012, PloS one.

[24]  J. Thomson,et al.  Derivation of human embryonic stem cells in defined conditions , 2006, Nature Biotechnology.

[25]  Ali Khademhosseini,et al.  Microwell-mediated control of embryoid body size regulates embryonic stem cell fate via differential expression of WNT5a and WNT11 , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[26]  S. Nishikawa,et al.  A ROCK inhibitor permits survival of dissociated human embryonic stem cells , 2007, Nature Biotechnology.

[27]  David V. Schaffer,et al.  A fully defined and scalable 3D culture system for human pluripotent stem cell expansion and differentiation , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[28]  F. J. Livesey,et al.  Directed differentiation of human pluripotent stem cells to cerebral cortex neurons and neural networks , 2012, Nature Protocols.

[29]  Sean P. Palecek,et al.  3-D microwell culture of human embryonic stem cells. , 2006, Biomaterials.

[30]  M. Tomishima,et al.  Highly efficient neural conversion of human ES and iPS cells by dual inhibition of SMAD signaling , 2009, Nature Biotechnology.

[31]  Nobutaka Hattori,et al.  Cerebral organoids model human brain development and microcephaly , 2014, Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society.

[32]  Peter W Zandstra,et al.  Niche‐mediated control of human embryonic stem cell self‐renewal and differentiation , 2007, The EMBO journal.

[33]  Jennifer M. Bolin,et al.  Chemically defined conditions for human iPS cell derivation and culture , 2011, Nature Methods.

[34]  Eugenia Kumacheva,et al.  Generation of human embryonic stem cell‐derived mesoderm and cardiac cells using size‐specified aggregates in an oxygen‐controlled bioreactor , 2009, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[35]  Joshua Arnold,et al.  Synergistic contribution of SMAD signaling blockade and high localized cell density in the differentiation of neuroectoderm from H9 cells. , 2014, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[36]  Y. Liu,et al.  Creation of Engineered Human Embryonic Stem Cell Lines Using phiC31 Integrase , 2008, Stem cells.

[37]  Tiago G Fernandes,et al.  Integrated Platform for Production and Purification of Human Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Neural Precursors , 2013, Stem Cell Reviews and Reports.

[38]  D. Gottlieb,et al.  FGF and EGF are mitogens for immortalized neural progenitors. , 1994, Journal of neurobiology.

[39]  P. Itsykson,et al.  Derivation, propagation and controlled differentiation of human embryonic stem cells in suspension , 2010, Nature Biotechnology.

[40]  K. Woodhouse,et al.  Control of Human Embryonic Stem Cell Colony and Aggregate Size Heterogeneity Influences Differentiation Trajectories , 2008, Stem cells.