Tuning the electrolyte network structure to invoke quasi-solid state sulfur conversion and suppress lithium dendrite formation in Li–S batteries

The lithium–sulfur battery is promising as an alternative to conventional lithium-ion technology due to the high energy density of both sulfur and lithium metal electrodes. An extended lifetime has been demonstrated, but two notable challenges still exist to realize its full potential: to overcome the undesired high electrolyte/sulfur ratio required for the catholyte-type mechanism that governs most cell configurations, and to inhibit Li dendrite growth and its parasitic reaction with the electrolyte that results in cell degradation. Here, we demonstrate that by tuning the electrolyte structure, the challenges at both electrodes can be tackled simultaneously. Specifically, the sulfur speciation pathway transforms from a dissolution–precipitation route to a quasi-solid state conversion in the presence of a lowered solvent activity and an extended electrolyte network, curtailing the need for high electrolyte volumes. Ab initio calculations reveal the nature of the network structure. With such an optimized structure, the electrolyte allows dendrite-free Li plating and shows a 20-fold reduction in parasitic reactions with Li, which avoids electrolyte consumption and greatly extends the life time of a low electrolyte/sulfur (5 µl mg–1) sulfur cell.Realization of the full potential of Li–S batteries requires effective methods to treat problems associated with both sulfur cathodes and lithium anodes. Here, the authors report suppression of electrolyte depletion and dendrite formation in Li–S batteries by tuning the solvent/salt molar ratio in a diglyme electrolyte to favour quasi-solid state conversion.

[1]  Shiro Seki,et al.  Solvate Ionic Liquid Electrolyte for Li–S Batteries , 2013 .

[2]  M. Oschatz,et al.  ZnO Hard Templating for Synthesis of Hierarchical Porous Carbons with Tailored Porosity and High Performance in Lithium‐Sulfur Battery , 2015 .

[3]  D. Aurbach,et al.  The Correlation Between Surface Chemistry, Surface Morphology, and Cycling Efficiency of Lithium Electrodes in a Few Polar Aprotic Systems , 1989 .

[4]  Xiangming He,et al.  Determination of Lithium-Ion Transference Numbers in LiPF6–PC Solutions Based on Electrochemical Polarization and NMR Measurements , 2008 .

[5]  John H. Strange,et al.  Conductivity and NMR study of ionic mobility in lithium oxide , 1990 .

[6]  Dipan Kundu,et al.  Surface-enhanced redox chemistry of polysulphides on a metallic and polar host for lithium-sulphur batteries , 2014, Nature Communications.

[7]  Kresse,et al.  Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. , 1996, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

[8]  M. Wagemaker,et al.  Accessing the bottleneck in all-solid state batteries, lithium-ion transport over the solid-electrolyte-electrode interface , 2017, Nature Communications.

[9]  Kevin G. Gallagher,et al.  Sparingly Solvating Electrolytes for High Energy Density Lithium-Sulfur Batteries , 2016 .

[10]  Doron Aurbach,et al.  A short review of failure mechanisms of lithium metal and lithiated graphite anodes in liquid electrolyte solutions , 2002 .

[11]  Ji‐Guang Zhang,et al.  Long term stability of Li-S batteries using high concentration lithium nitrate electrolytes , 2017 .

[12]  Guangmin Zhou A graphene foam electrode with high sulfur loading for flexible and high energy Li-S batteries , 2015 .

[13]  Martin Z. Bazant,et al.  Transition of lithium growth mechanisms in liquid electrolytes , 2016 .

[14]  Linda F. Nazar,et al.  Advances in lithium–sulfur batteries based on multifunctional cathodes and electrolytes , 2016, Nature Energy.

[15]  H. Wiemhöfer,et al.  Measurement of transference numbers for lithium ion electrolytes via four different methods, a comparative study , 2011 .

[16]  Yuki Yamada,et al.  Fire-extinguishing organic electrolytes for safe batteries , 2018 .

[17]  Guangyuan Zheng,et al.  Nanostructured sulfur cathodes. , 2013, Chemical Society reviews.

[18]  Shaogang Wang,et al.  Rapid communicationA graphene foam electrode with high sulfur loading for flexible and high energy Li-S batteries , 2015 .

[19]  W. Lamanna,et al.  The Surface Film Formed on a Lithium Metal Electrode in a New Imide Electrolyte, Lithium Bis(perfluoroethylsulfonylimide) [ LiN ( C 2 F 5 SO 2 ) 2 ] , 1999 .

[20]  Kevin G. Gallagher,et al.  Critical Link between Materials Chemistry and Cell-Level Design for High Energy Density and Low Cost Lithium-Sulfur Transportation Battery , 2015 .

[21]  Kenville E. Hendrickson,et al.  Metal-Sulfur Battery Cathodes Based on PAN-Sulfur Composites. , 2015, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[22]  Feng Li,et al.  More Reliable Lithium‐Sulfur Batteries: Status, Solutions and Prospects , 2017, Advanced materials.

[23]  Yi Cui,et al.  Understanding the Anchoring Effect of Two-Dimensional Layered Materials for Lithium-Sulfur Batteries. , 2015, Nano letters.

[24]  Lei Cheng,et al.  Effect of Hydrofluoroether Cosolvent Addition on Li Solvation in Acetonitrile-Based Solvate Electrolytes and Its Influence on S Reduction in a Li-S Battery. , 2016, ACS applied materials & interfaces.

[25]  Lin Ma,et al.  Nanomaterials: Science and applications in the lithium–sulfur battery , 2015 .

[26]  L. Nazar,et al.  Radical or Not Radical: Revisiting Lithium–Sulfur Electrochemistry in Nonaqueous Electrolytes , 2015 .

[27]  Xiulin Fan,et al.  High-Performance All-Solid-State Lithium-Sulfur Battery Enabled by a Mixed-Conductive Li2S Nanocomposite. , 2016, Nano letters.

[28]  Petr Novák,et al.  Progress Towards Commercially Viable Li–S Battery Cells , 2015 .

[29]  D. Aurbach,et al.  Review on Li‐Sulfur Battery Systems: an Integral Perspective , 2015 .

[30]  K. Amine,et al.  Unique aqueous Li-ion/sulfur chemistry with high energy density and reversibility , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[31]  Georg Kresse,et al.  Assessing the quality of the random phase approximation for lattice constants and atomization energies of solids , 2010 .

[32]  Yuki Yamada,et al.  Unusual stability of acetonitrile-based superconcentrated electrolytes for fast-charging lithium-ion batteries. , 2014, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[33]  Hoover,et al.  Canonical dynamics: Equilibrium phase-space distributions. , 1985, Physical review. A, General physics.

[34]  Kevin N. Wood,et al.  Dendrites and Pits: Untangling the Complex Behavior of Lithium Metal Anodes through Operando Video Microscopy , 2016, ACS central science.

[35]  D. Prendergast,et al.  Characterization of Polysulfide Radicals Present in an Ether‐Based Electrolyte of a Lithium–Sulfur Battery During Initial Discharge Using In Situ X‐Ray Absorption Spectroscopy Experiments and First‐Principles Calculations , 2015 .

[36]  Hong‐Jie Peng,et al.  Enhanced Electrochemical Kinetics on Conductive Polar Mediators for Lithium-Sulfur Batteries. , 2016, Angewandte Chemie.

[37]  Yuki Yamada,et al.  Superconcentrated electrolytes for a high-voltage lithium-ion battery , 2016, Nature Communications.

[38]  Kun Fu,et al.  Three-dimensional bilayer garnet solid electrolyte based high energy density lithium metal–sulfur batteries , 2017 .

[39]  Wolfgang G. Zeier,et al.  Direct Observation of the Interfacial Instability of the Fast Ionic Conductor Li10GeP2S12 at the Lithium Metal Anode , 2016 .

[40]  C. Johnson Progress and Prospects , 1991 .

[41]  Michel Armand,et al.  A new class of Solvent-in-Salt electrolyte for high-energy rechargeable metallic lithium batteries , 2013, Nature Communications.

[42]  Qiang Zhang,et al.  Review on High‐Loading and High‐Energy Lithium–Sulfur Batteries , 2017 .

[43]  Donghai Wang,et al.  Nitrogen‐Doped Mesoporous Carbon Promoted Chemical Adsorption of Sulfur and Fabrication of High‐Areal‐Capacity Sulfur Cathode with Exceptional Cycling Stability for Lithium‐Sulfur Batteries , 2014 .

[44]  D. Prendergast,et al.  In Situ X-ray Absorption Spectroscopy Studies of Discharge Reactions in a Thick Cathode of a Lithium Sulfur Battery , 2017 .

[45]  G. Kresse,et al.  From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method , 1999 .

[46]  Jun Liu,et al.  On the Way Toward Understanding Solution Chemistry of Lithium Polysulfides for High Energy Li–S Redox Flow Batteries , 2015 .

[47]  Kevin G. Gallagher,et al.  Directing the Lithium–Sulfur Reaction Pathway via Sparingly Solvating Electrolytes for High Energy Density Batteries , 2017, ACS central science.

[48]  L. Nazar,et al.  Unique behaviour of nonsolvents for polysulphides in lithium–sulphur batteries , 2014 .

[49]  Yong‐Sheng Hu,et al.  MWCNT porous microspheres with an efficient 3D conductive network for high performance lithium–sulfur batteries , 2016 .

[50]  Li-Jun Wan,et al.  Lithium-sulfur batteries: electrochemistry, materials, and prospects. , 2013, Angewandte Chemie.

[51]  Patrick Bonnick,et al.  Perspective—Lithium-Sulfur Batteries , 2018 .

[52]  Lin Gu,et al.  Smaller sulfur molecules promise better lithium-sulfur batteries. , 2012, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[53]  L. Nazar,et al.  A highly ordered nanostructured carbon-sulphur cathode for lithium-sulphur batteries. , 2009, Nature materials.

[54]  Burke,et al.  Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple. , 1996, Physical review letters.

[55]  O. Borodin,et al.  High rate and stable cycling of lithium metal anode , 2015, Nature Communications.

[56]  D. Aurbach,et al.  X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy studies of lithium surfaces prepared in several important electrolyte solutions. A comparison with previous studies by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy , 1996 .

[57]  Arumugam Manthiram,et al.  Lithium–Sulfur Batteries: Progress and Prospects , 2015, Advanced materials.

[58]  S. Seki,et al.  Oxidative-stability enhancement and charge transport mechanism in glyme-lithium salt equimolar complexes. , 2011, Journal of the American Chemical Society.