In situ trap parameter studies in CCDs for space applications

Charge-Coupled Devices are the detector of choice for the focal planes of many optical and X-ray space telescopes. In recent years, EM-CCDs, SCDs and CMOS sensors have been used, or baselined, for missions in which the detection of X-ray and visible photons are key to the science goals of the mission. When placed in orbit, silicon-based detectors will suffer radiation damage as a consequence of the harsh space radiation environment, creating traps in the silicon. The radiation-induced traps will capture and release signal electrons, effectively “smearing” the image. Without correction, this smearing of the image would have major consequences on the science goals of the missions. Fitting to observed results, through careful planning of observation strategies while the radiation dose received remains low in the early stages of the mission, has previously been used to correct against the radiation damage effects. As the science goals becoming increasingly demanding, however, the correction algorithms require greater accuracy and a more physical approach is required, removing the effects of the radiation damage by modelling the trap capture and release mechanisms to a high level of detail. The drive for increasingly accurate trap parameters has led to the development of new methods of characterisation of traps in the silicon, measuring the trap properties and their effects to the single-trap level in situ. Here, we summarise the latest developments in trap characterisation techniques for n-channel and p-channel devices.

[1]  Alexie Leauthaud,et al.  Pixel-based correction for Charge Transfer Inefficiency in the Hubble Space Telescope Advanced Camera for Surveys , 2009, 0909.0507.

[2]  P. Cochat,et al.  Et al , 2008, Archives de pediatrie : organe officiel de la Societe francaise de pediatrie.

[3]  Hao Wang,et al.  Phosphorous–vacancy–oxygen defects in silicon , 2013 .

[4]  J. P. D. Gow,et al.  Assessment of proton radiation-induced charge transfer inefficiency in the CCD273 detector for the Euclid Dark Energy Mission , 2012, Other Conferences.

[5]  Alexander Chroneos,et al.  Vacancy-oxygen defects in silicon: the impact of isovalent doping , 2014, Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics.

[6]  David Hall,et al.  The relationship between pumped traps and signal loss in buried channel CCDs , 2013, Optics & Photonics - Optical Engineering + Applications.

[7]  Ulrich Bastian,et al.  The Gaia mission: science, organization and present status , 2007, Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union.

[8]  Andrew D. Holland,et al.  Multi-level parallel clocking of CCDs for: improving charge transfer efficiency, clearing persistence, clocked anti-blooming, and generating low-noise backgrounds for pumping , 2013, Optics & Photonics - Optical Engineering + Applications.

[9]  R. Hall Electron-Hole Recombination in Germanium , 1952 .

[10]  J. Bruijne,et al.  An analytical model of radiation-induced Charge Transfer Inefficiency for CCD detectors , 2013, 1302.1416.

[11]  Ben J Hicks,et al.  SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering , 2001 .

[12]  J. Amiaux,et al.  Defining a weak lensing experiment in space , 2012, 1210.7691.

[13]  Andrew D. Holland,et al.  Determination of In Situ Trap Properties in CCDs Using a “Single-Trap Pumping” Technique , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[14]  David Hall,et al.  Device modelling and model verification for the Euclid CCD273 detector , 2012, Other Conferences.

[15]  J. Gow,et al.  Optimization of Device Clocking Schemes to Minimize the Effects of Radiation Damage in Charge-Coupled Devices , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices.

[16]  J. Rhodes,et al.  The Effects of Charge Transfer Inefficiency (CTI) on Galaxy Shape Measurements , 2010, 1002.1479.

[17]  N. Murray,et al.  VIS: the visible imager for Euclid , 2012, Other Conferences.

[18]  David Hall,et al.  Mitigating radiation-induced charge transfer inefficiency in full-frame CCD applications by 'pumping' traps , 2012, Other Conferences.

[19]  Roberto Scaramella,et al.  Origins of weak lensing systematics, and requirements on future instrumentation (or knowledge of instrumentation) , 2012, 1210.7690.

[20]  R. Nichol,et al.  Euclid Definition Study Report , 2011, 1110.3193.

[21]  David Hall,et al.  A study of electron-multiplying CCDs for use on the International X-ray Observatory off-plane x-ray grating spectrometer , 2010, Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[22]  M. Cropper,et al.  Assessment of space proton radiation-induced charge transfer inefficiency in the CCD204 for the Euclid space observatory , 2012 .

[23]  A. Holland,et al.  Modelling charge storage in Euclid CCD structures , 2012 .

[24]  W. Read,et al.  Statistics of the Recombinations of Holes and Electrons , 1952 .

[25]  David Hall,et al.  Modelling charge transfer in a radiation damaged charge coupled device for Euclid , 2012, Other Conferences.

[26]  J. Gow,et al.  Proton Damage Comparison of an e2v Technologies n-channel and p-channel CCD204 , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.