Tangible Tools for Public Transportation Planning: Public Involvement and Learning for Bus Rapid Transit Corridor Design

Open governance and open data have given rise to new collaborative tools for public involvement in transit planning. The research presented in this paper extends such tools, adding tangible and interactive features in an attempt to foster interaction, dialog, and social learning. Three tools, representing the impacts of bus rapid transit (BRT) projects at the street, neighborhood, and regional scales, were deployed at a series of public workshops in Boston. A pre-/post- survey design reveals substantive learning about BRT, supported by participants’ general agreement with statements about social learning. The quality of dialog in the workshops may point to the potential for more in-depth, double-loop learning. Of the tools used in the workshop, participants judged the one representing the street scale to be the easiest to use, whereas they judged the touchscreen regional map to be the most relevant and credible. Further research could test such tools with more representative participants and in other settings.

[1]  Christopher Zegras,et al.  Applying the General Transit Feed Specification to the Global South , 2014 .

[2]  S. Arnstein,et al.  Ladder of Citizen Participation , 2020 .

[3]  E. Talen Bottom-Up GIS , 2000 .

[4]  C. Argyris Single-loop and double-loop models in research on decision making. , 1976 .

[5]  J. Innes,et al.  Reframing public participation: strategies for the 21st century , 2004 .

[6]  Anson F. Stewart Mapping transit accessibility: Possibilities for public participation , 2017 .

[7]  Francesca Napolitan,et al.  Shifting Urban Priorities? , 2008 .

[8]  Peter Cruickshank,et al.  Creating Smart-er Cities: An Overview , 2011 .

[9]  Michael Batty,et al.  Planning Support Systems: Progress, Predictions, and Speculations on the Shape of Things to Come , 2007 .

[10]  Anson F. Stewart,et al.  CoAXs: A Collaborative Accessibility-based Stakeholder Engagement System for communicating transport impacts , 2016 .

[11]  Michael Replogle,et al.  Recapturing Global Leadership in Bus Rapid Transit: A Survey of Select U.S. Cities , 2011 .

[12]  M. Lane Public Participation in Planning: an intellectual history , 2005 .

[13]  R. Gakenheimer,et al.  Transportation planning as response to controversy: The Boston case , 1976 .

[14]  Debbie A. Niemeier,et al.  Measuring Accessibility: An Exploration of Issues and Alternatives , 1997 .

[15]  Francisca M Rojas,et al.  Transit Transparency: Effective Disclosure through Open Data , 2012 .

[16]  Robert Goodspeed,et al.  Sketching and learning: A planning support system field study , 2016 .

[17]  R Kennedy,et al.  INSIDE THE BLACKBOX: MAKING TRANSPORTATION MODELS WORK FOR LIVABLE COMMUNITIES , 1996 .

[18]  Edward Weiner,et al.  URBAN TRANSPORTATION PLANNING IN THE UNITED STATES: AN HISTORICAL OVERVIEW , 1986 .

[19]  Christopher Zegras,et al.  Mainstreaming sustainable urban transport: putting the pieces together , 2011 .

[20]  Andreas Kratky,et al.  Touching Buildings - A Tangible Interface for Architecture Visualization , 2013, HCI.

[21]  R. Hollands Will the real smart city please stand up? , 2008, The Routledge Companion to Smart Cities.

[22]  Andrew Byrd,et al.  Evidence-Based Transit and Land Use Sketch Planning Using Interactive Accessibility Methods on Combined Schedule and Headway-Based Networks , 2017 .

[23]  R. Adland,et al.  What makes a freight market index? An empirical analysis of vessel fixtures in the offshore market , 2017 .

[24]  Hiroshi Ishii,et al.  Urban Simulation and the Luminous Planning Table , 2001 .

[25]  Robert Goodspeed,et al.  Planning support systems for spatial planning through social learning , 2013 .

[26]  D. Metz The Myth of Travel Time Saving , 2008 .

[27]  Yannis Charalabidis,et al.  Benefits, Adoption Barriers and Myths of Open Data and Open Government , 2012, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[28]  Ira Winder,et al.  An Observational Study of Usability in Collaborative Tangible Interfaces for Complex Planning Systems , 2015 .

[29]  Mary Lou Maher,et al.  Do Tangible User Interfaces Impact Spatial Cognition in Collaborative Design? , 2005, CDVE.

[30]  Nigel H. M. Wilson,et al.  Ridership Response to Incremental Bus Rapid Transit Upgrades in North America , 2015 .