Manual Versus Target-Controlled Infusion Remifentanil Administration in Spontaneously Breathing Patients

BACKGROUND: The combination of propofol-remifentanil for procedural deep sedation in spontaneously breathing patients is characterized by the frequent incidence of side effects, especially respiratory depression. These side effects may be due to either the drug combination or the drug delivery technique. Target-controlled infusion (TCI) might optimize drug delivery. In this prospective, randomized, double-blind study in patients undergoing elective colonoscopy, we thus tried to answer two questions: first, if adding remifentanil to propofol surpasses the disadvantages of the combination of these two products, and second, if administration of remifentanil via TCI decreases the incidence of side effects, compared to manually controlled administration. METHODS: Patients undergoing elective colonoscopy were randomly assigned to receive remifentanil via manually controlled continuous infusion (MCI) (0.125 &mgr;g · kg−1 · min−1 for 2 min followed by a continuous infusion of 0.05 &mgr;g · kg−1 · min−1), TCI remifentanil (1 ng/mL), or placebo (normal saline either as TCI or manual infusion of equivalent rate). All patients received TCI propofol, adjusted to a target concentration level that provided deep sedation in which patients were not responsive to verbal commands, but maintained spontaneous ventilation without assistance. RESULTS: Significantly more patients in the placebo group showed movement, cough and hiccup, which transiently interfered with the examination. There were no clinically significant differences in hemodynamic or recovery variables among all groups. Remifentanil administered via TCI resulted in a decrease in propofol requirements. The incidence of hypopnea and apnea was less frequent when remifentanil was administered via TCI compared to MCI (TCI n = 7, MCI n = 16, P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The combination of remifentanil and propofol for deep sedation in spontaneously breathing patients, offered better conditions for colonoscopy than propofol used as a single drug. Remifentanil administered via TCI resulted in a decrease in propofol dosing and in a lower incidence in apnea and respiratory depression (TCI n = 7, MCI n = 16, P < 0.05), compared to manually controlled administration of remifentanil.

[1]  Steven L. Shafer,et al.  Algorithms to rapidly achieve and maintain stable drug concentrations at the site of drug effect with a computer-controlled infusion pump , 1992, Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics.

[2]  Talmage D Egan,et al.  Target-controlled drug delivery: progress toward an intravenous "vaporizer" and automated anesthetic administration. , 2003, Anesthesiology.

[3]  S. Shafer,et al.  The Influence of Method of Administration and Covariates on the Pharmacokinetics of Propofol in Adult Volunteers , 1998, Anesthesiology.

[4]  D. Steward.  A simplified scoring system for the post-operative recovery room. , 1976, Canadian Anaesthetists' Society journal.

[5]  M. Vos,et al.  Propofol versus remifentanil for monitored anaesthesia care during colonoscopy , 2003, European journal of anaesthesiology.

[6]  D. Steward.  A simplified scoring system for the post-operative recovery room , 1975 .

[7]  G. Kenny,et al.  Target‐controlled remifentanil in combination with propofol for spontaneously breathing day‐case patients , 1999, Anaesthesia.

[8]  M. Struys,et al.  Comparison of Plasma Compartment versus Two Methods for Effect Compartment–controlled Target-controlled Infusion for Propofol , 2000, Anesthesiology.

[9]  S L Shafer,et al.  Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Remifentanil: II. Model Application , 1997, Anesthesiology.

[10]  S L Shafer,et al.  The influence of age on propofol pharmacodynamics. , 1999, Anesthesiology.

[11]  C. Reilly,et al.  Remifentanil in combination with propofol for spontaneous ventilation anaesthesia. , 1998, British journal of anaesthesia.

[12]  J B Gross,et al.  The Pharmacodynamic Effect of a Remifentanil Bolus on Ventilatory Control , 2000, Anesthesiology.

[13]  Erik Olofsen,et al.  Response Surface Modeling of Remifentanil–Propofol Interaction on Cardiorespiratory Control and Bispectral Index , 2003, Anesthesiology.

[14]  M. Struys,et al.  Remifentanil used to supplement propofol does not improve quality of sedation during spontaneous respiration. , 2004, Journal of clinical anesthesia.

[15]  S L Shafer,et al.  Influence of Age and Gender on the Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Remifentanil: I. Model Development , 1997, Anesthesiology.

[16]  William J. Perks,et al.  A Comparison of Patient-Controlled Sedation Using Either Remifentanil or Remifentanil-Propofol for Shock Wave Lithotripsy , 2001, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[17]  J. Bruhn,et al.  Opioid-induced respiratory depression is associated with increased tidal volume variability , 2003, European journal of anaesthesiology.