INDISPENSABILITY ARGUMENTS AND INSTRUMENTAL NOMINALISM
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Allen Hazen,et al. Expressive completeness in modal language , 1976, J. Philos. Log..
[2] Joel I. Friedman. Modal Platonism: an Easy Way to Avoid Ontological Commitment to Abstract Entities , 2005, J. Philos. Log..
[3] J. Ketland. VI—Nominalistic Adequacy , 2011 .
[4] Christopher Peacocke,et al. Necessity and truth theories , 1978, J. Philos. Log..
[5] Michael D. Resnik,et al. Second-order Logic Still Wild , 1988 .
[6] Joseph Melia,et al. Weaseling away the indispensability argument , 2000 .
[7] Joseph Melia,et al. On what there's not , 1995 .
[8] Mark Colyvan,et al. There is No Easy Road to Nominalism , 2010 .
[9] Michael Fara,et al. Counterparts and Actuality , 2005 .
[10] Fabrice Correia,et al. Modality, Quantification, and Many Vlach-Operators , 2007, J. Philos. Log..
[11] Harold T. Hodes. On modal logics which enrich first-order S5 , 1984, Journal of Philosophical Logic.
[12] Harold T. Hodes. Some theorems on the expressive limitations of modal languages , 1984, J. Philos. Log..
[13] C. Pincock. A Role for Mathematics in the Physical Sciences , 2007 .
[14] A. Baker. Are there Genuine Mathematical Explanations of Physical Phenomena , 2005 .
[15] Øystein Linnebo,et al. Plural Quantification Exposed , 2003 .
[16] F. Muller,et al. Discerning Elementary Particles* , 2009, Philosophy of Science.