A New Analytical Model for Predicting Steam-Assisted Gravity-Drainage Performance in the Plateau and Decline Stages

Analytical models have been widely used to study the steam-assisted gravity-drainage (SAGD) process. Existing analytical models for this process either underperform or are limited in their applicability. In this paper, a new analytical model is developed to address these shortcomings. The new model consists of three major components. First, an equation for predicting oil production rate during the plateau stage was developed. This equation allows for permeability anisotropy in the reservoir, which is neglected in the majority of existing analytical models. Second, a novel and concise equation for calculating oil production rate during the decline stage was derived. This equation for the first time provides a general relationship between oil production rate during the decline stage and the properties of the reservoir together with key operating conditions and simultaneously mitigates the shortcomings of the majority of existing models (e.g., inapplicable in the decline stage of the SAGD process). Third, new correlations representing heat loss from the steam chamber to the overburden and heat transfer to oil-undepleted zone ahead of the chamber interface were derived; new predictive equations for estimating steam/oil ratio (SOR) in the plateau and decline stages of SAGD were obtained. The new model has been validated against a 2D scaled laboratory experiment and a set of field data. The results of this validation show that the new model predicts the oil production rate and SOR over the lifetime of an SAGD operation (excluding the short steam rise period) reasonably well. Predictions from the new model were also compared with several existing analytical models: The new model provided a closer match to actual measurements than other models. This robust model is grounded in more physics and incorporates reservoir geology and well operating conditions. It enables better understanding of the SAGD process and significantly improves the prediction of SAGD performance. Hence, it can be used to design new SAGD projects, predict existing projects, and optimize existing projects.

[1]  Qianqian Wang,et al.  A Novel Analytical Model for Steam Chamber Rise in Steam-Assisted Gravity Drainage , 2022, SPE Journal.

[2]  J. V. van Dorp Condensing Solvent Processes: In Search of the Production Function , 2021 .

[3]  M. Clarke,et al.  Analytical Modeling of the Cyclic ES-SAGD Process , 2020 .

[4]  Cunkui Huang,et al.  Experimental study of diffusivity of hexane in bitumen‐saturated porous media under high temperature/pressure conditions , 2020 .

[5]  S. M. F. Ali,et al.  Analytical model of steam-assisted gravity drainage (SAGD) process in relation to constant injection rate , 2020 .

[6]  F. Torabi,et al.  An Improved Mathematical Model for Accurate Prediction of the Heavy Oil Production Rate during the SAGD Process , 2020, Processes.

[7]  Huiqing Liu,et al.  A new comprehensive model to estimate the steam chamber expansion and recovery performance of entire SAGD process , 2020 .

[8]  I. Gates,et al.  Reducing the Energy and Steam Consumption of SAGD Through Cyclic Solvent Co-Injection , 2019, Energies.

[9]  Zhangxin Chen,et al.  A New Approach to the Analytical Treatment of Steam-Assisted Gravity Drainage: A Prescribed Interface Model , 2019, SPE Journal.

[10]  M. Hossain,et al.  New SAGD model for oil production using a concave parabola steam chamber geometry , 2019, Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering.

[11]  R. Okuno,et al.  Analytical solution for steam-assisted gravity drainage with consideration of temperature variation along the edge of a steam chamber , 2018 .

[12]  S. M. F. Ali,et al.  Analytical Treatment of Steam-Assisted Gravity Drainage: Old and New , 2017 .

[13]  J. Abedi,et al.  Semi-analytical modeling of steam-solvent gravity drainage of heavy oil and bitumen: Steady state model with linear interface , 2016 .

[14]  M. Irani,et al.  Discussion on the Effects of Temperature on Thermal Properties in the Steam-Assisted-Gravity-Drainage (SAGD) Process. Part 1: Thermal Conductivity (includes associated Errata and Addendum) , 2016 .

[15]  Daniel Nugent,et al.  Subcool, Fluid Productivity, and Liquid Level Above a SAGD Producer , 2013 .

[16]  S. Srinivasan,et al.  Analysis of Impact of Thermal and Permeability Heterogeneity on SAGD Performance Using a Semi-Analytical Approach , 2013 .

[17]  K. Miura,et al.  An Analytical Model To Predict Cumulative Steam/Oil Ratio (CSOR) in Thermal-Recovery SAGD Process , 2012 .

[18]  Ian D. Gates,et al.  Impact of steam trap control on performance of steam-assisted gravity drainage , 2010 .

[19]  Neil Edmunds,et al.  A Unified Model for Prediction of CSOR in Steam-Based Bitumen Recovery , 2007 .

[20]  R. Leaute,et al.  Liquid Addition to Steam for Enhancing Recovery (LASER) of Bitumen With CSS: Results From the First Pilot Cycle , 2005 .

[21]  G. Beaulieu,et al.  Novel Expanding Solvent-SAGD Process "ES-SAGD" , 2003 .

[22]  S. Gittins,et al.  Field Implementation of Solvent Aided Process , 2002 .

[23]  J. J. van Dorp,et al.  Steam management in composite mature steam floods, Midway Sunset field , 1995 .

[24]  John C. Reis,et al.  A Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage Model For Tar Sands: Radial Geometry , 1992 .

[25]  Roger M. Butler,et al.  A New Approach To The Modelling Of Steam-Assisted Gravity Drainage , 1985 .

[26]  Roger M. Butler,et al.  Theoretical studies on the gravity drainage of heavy oil during in‐situ steam heating , 1981 .

[27]  Roger M. Butler,et al.  The Gravity Drainage of Steam-heated Heavy Oil to Parallel Horizontal Wells , 1981 .