Water retention in reservoirs and concentrated turbine operations allow electricity to be produced on demand. Sudden opening and closing of the turbines can produce highly unsteady flow conditions in the river downstream of the tailrace channel, the so-called hydropeaking. Mitigating its adverse impacts on the aquatic ecosystems has become a mandatory requirement in today’s water policies in many countries. Existing facilities are being ‘rehabilitated’ for habitat improvement or restoration, and new facilities designed with a focus on habitat conservation. However, there are regions still suffering from a lack of experience in respect of hydropowerrelated ecological challenges and little scientific knowledge available on local ecosystems. The paper presents two selected projects of hydropeaking mitigation in Switzerland: the Mauvoisin II scheme extension according to project specific design guidelines and the Plessur hydropower scheme according to today’s mitigation policy. For both projects the context, the evaluation procedure as well as the findings are given and compared, covering a wide range of feasible solutions. Understanding the specific behaviour of local species is the starting point in order to address the unique needs for each and every project. However, the approach how to define the best performing intervention strategy can be defined and will be presented in the paper, considering the lessons learnt from hydropeaking mitigation projects.
[1]
Martin Bieri,et al.
Flow restoration in Alpine streams affected by hydropower operations—a case study for a compensation basin
,
2014
.
[2]
A. Arthington,et al.
Basic Principles and Ecological Consequences of Altered Flow Regimes for Aquatic Biodiversity
,
2002,
Environmental management.
[3]
J. Cech,et al.
Hydropower-related pulsed-flow impacts on stream fishes: a brief review, conceptual model, knowledge gaps, and research needs
,
2011,
Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries.
[4]
R. Sparks,et al.
THE NATURAL FLOW REGIME. A PARADIGM FOR RIVER CONSERVATION AND RESTORATION
,
1997
.
[5]
Anton Schleiss,et al.
Mitigation measures for fish habitat improvement in Alpine rivers affected by hydropower operations
,
2014
.
[6]
Otto Moog,et al.
Quantification of daily peak hydropower effects on aquatic fauna and management to minimize environmental impacts
,
1993
.
[7]
Piotr Parasiewicz,et al.
The effect of managed hydropower peaking on the physical habitat, benthos and fish fauna in the River Bregenzerach in Austria
,
1998
.