On the Need for a Paradigm Shift in the Dutch Command and Information System for the Acute Phase of Disasters

By and large, scientists agreed on what should be the output of a good command and information system in the acute phase of a disaster. The public needs fast and accurate information and fast ‘meaning‐making’ if they are to be as self‐reliant as possible and to be in the best possible position to cope with the shock of the disaster. Operational units need decentralized command and sometimes fast strategic decision‐making. Despite this, classical command and information systems such as the three‐tier system required by law in the Netherlands fail to deliver in this regard. We sketch an analytical framework which when applied to the Dutch system predicts its failure. We also present a different command and information system, already used in the Drenthe Safety Region, which satisfies the analytical framework. Early experience with the Drenthe system shows the potential of the new system but also shows that no system is better than the people in it.

[1]  Allan McConnell,et al.  Mission Impossible? Planning and Preparing for Crisis , 2006 .

[2]  I. Helsloot,et al.  Bordering on Reality: Findings on the Bonfire Crisis Management Simulation , 2005 .

[3]  Astrid Scholtens.  Controlled Collaboration in Disaster and Crisis Management in the Netherlands, History and Practice of an Overestimated and Underestimated Concept , 2008 .

[4]  Russell R. Dynes,et al.  Community Emergency Planning: False Assumptions and Inappropriate Analogies , 1994, International Journal of Mass Emergencies & Disasters.

[5]  Kevin Arbuthnot,et al.  A Command Gap? A Practitioner's Analysis of the Value of Comparisons Between the UK's Military and Emergency Services' Command and Control Models in the Context of UK Resilience Operations , 2008 .

[6]  Russell R. Dynes,et al.  Situational Altruism: Toward an Explanation of Pathologies in Disaster Assistance , 1994 .

[7]  G. Bonanno,et al.  What predicts psychological resilience after disaster? The role of demographics, resources, and life stress. , 2007, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[8]  M. Lindell,et al.  Understanding Citizen Response to Disasters with Implications for Terrorism , 2003 .

[9]  I. Helsloot,et al.  Twitter: An Underutilized Potential During Sudden Crises? , 2013 .

[10]  E. Quarantelli.  Community Crises: An Exploratory Comparison of the Characteristics and Consequences of Disasters and Riots , 1993 .

[11]  Roberta Calderwood,et al.  Critical decision method for eliciting knowledge , 1989, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[12]  A. Boin,et al.  Leadership in Times of Crisis: A Framework for Assessment , 2013 .

[13]  Christoph Schneeweiss,et al.  Distributed decision making--a unified approach , 2003, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[14]  Jeroen Wolbers,et al.  Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management Negotiating the ‘ Trading Zone ’ . Creating a Shared Information Infrastructure in the Dutch Public Safety Sector , 2012 .

[15]  I. Helsloot,et al.  Citizen Response to Disasters: A Survey of Literature and Some Practical Implications , 2004 .

[16]  Nathan E. Busch,et al.  Integrating Federal Approaches to Post-Cyber Incident Mitigation , 2013 .

[17]  Berndt Brehmer,et al.  Dynamic Decision Making in Command and Control , 2000 .

[18]  Shari R. Veil,et al.  A Work-in-Process Literature Review: Incorporating Social Media in Risk and Crisis Communication , 2011 .

[19]  K. Weick.  The Collapse of Sensemaking in Organizations: The Mann Gulch Disaster , 1993 .

[20]  I. Helsloot,et al.  A Critical Examination of the Assumptions Regarding Centralized Coordination in Large-Scale Emergency Situations , 2013 .