A Model of Cancer Stem Cells Derived from Mouse Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells

Cancer stem cells (CSCs) are capable of continuous proliferation and self-renewal and are proposed to play significant roles in oncogenesis, tumor growth, metastasis and cancer recurrence. CSCs are considered derived from normal stem cells affected by the tumor microenvironment although the mechanism of development is not clear yet. In 2007, Yamanaka's group succeeded in generating Nanog mouse induced pluripotent stem (miPS) cells, in which green fluorescent protein (GFP) has been inserted into the 5′-untranslated region of the Nanog gene. Usually, iPS cells, just like embryonic stem cells, are considered to be induced into progenitor cells, which differentiate into various normal phenotypes depending on the normal niche. We hypothesized that CSCs could be derived from Nanog miPS cells in the conditioned culture medium of cancer cell lines, which is a mimic of carcinoma microenvironment. As a result, the Nanog miPS cells treated with the conditioned medium of mouse Lewis lung carcinoma acquired characteristics of CSCs, in that they formed spheroids expressing GFP in suspension culture, and had a high tumorigenicity in Balb/c nude mice exhibiting angiogenesis in vivo. In addition, these iPS-derived CSCs had a capacity of self-renewal and expressed the marker genes, Nanog, Rex1, Eras, Esg1 and Cripto, associated with stem cell properties and an undifferentiated state. Thus we concluded that a model of CSCs was originally developed from miPS cells and proposed the conditioned culture medium of cancer cell lines might perform as niche for producing CSCs. The model of CSCs and the procedure of their establishment will help study the genetic alterations and the secreted factors in the tumor microenvironment which convert miPS cells to CSCs. Furthermore, the identification of potentially bona fide markers of CSCs, which will help the development of novel anti-cancer therapies, might be possible though the CSC model.

[1]  T. Misteli,et al.  In vitro generation of human cells with cancer stem cell properties , 2011, Nature Cell Biology.

[2]  P G Pelicci,et al.  Genomic instability in induced stem cells , 2011, Cell Death and Differentiation.

[3]  Riitta Lahesmaa,et al.  Copy number variation and selection during reprogramming to pluripotency , 2011, Nature.

[4]  G. Smith,et al.  The normal mammary microenvironment suppresses the tumorigenic phenotype of mouse mammary tumor virus-neu-transformed mammary tumor cells , 2011, Oncogene.

[5]  Julie V. Harness,et al.  Dynamic changes in the copy number of pluripotency and cell proliferation genes in human ESCs and iPSCs during reprogramming and time in culture. , 2011, Cell stem cell.

[6]  K. Hochedlinger,et al.  Induced pluripotency: history, mechanisms, and applications. , 2010, Genes & development.

[7]  L. Ricci-Vitiani,et al.  New models for cancer research: human cancer stem cell xenografts. , 2010, Current opinion in pharmacology.

[8]  A. Nathwani,et al.  An introduction to induced pluripotent stem cells , 2010, British journal of haematology.

[9]  Milton Waner,et al.  Reversal of hyperglycemia in diabetic mouse models using induced-pluripotent stem (iPS)-derived pancreatic β-like cells , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  H. Ishii,et al.  Properties and identification of cancer stem cells: A changing insight into intractable cancer , 2010, Surgery Today.

[11]  A. Inutsuka,et al.  Unique multipotent cells in adult human mesenchymal cell populations , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  M. Shackleton Normal stem cells and cancer stem cells: similar and different. , 2010, Seminars in cancer biology.

[13]  E. Cattaneo,et al.  Neuropotent self-renewing neural stem (NS) cells derived from mouse induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells , 2010, Molecular and Cellular Neuroscience.

[14]  S. Lim,et al.  Hypoxic Tumor Cell Modulates Its Microenvironment to Enhance Angiogenic and Metastatic Potential by Secretion of Proteins and Exosomes* , 2010, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[15]  M. Hendrix,et al.  Epigenetically reprogramming metastatic tumor cells with an embryonic microenvironment. , 2009, Epigenomics.

[16]  C. Simón,et al.  Building a Framework for Embryonic Microenvironments and Cancer Stem Cells , 2009, Stem Cell Reviews and Reports.

[17]  Samuel A Wickline,et al.  Paracrine induction of endothelium by tumor exosomes , 2009, Laboratory Investigation.

[18]  S. Yamanaka,et al.  Orderly hematopoietic development of induced pluripotent stem cells via Flk‐1+ hemoangiogenic progenitors , 2009, Journal of cellular physiology.

[19]  J. Rak,et al.  Microvesicles: Messengers and mediators of tumor progression , 2009, Cell cycle.

[20]  C. Boulanger,et al.  Reprogramming cell fates in the mammary microenvironment , 2009, Cell cycle.

[21]  Shinya Yamanaka,et al.  A Fresh Look at iPS Cells , 2009, Cell.

[22]  V. Rotter,et al.  Cancer cells suppress p53 in adjacent fibroblasts , 2009, Oncogene.

[23]  K. Polyak,et al.  Cancer stem cells: a model in the making. , 2009, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[24]  C. Lengner,et al.  Transgenic Mice with Defined Combinations of Drug Inducible Reprogramming Factors , 2008, Nature Biotechnology.

[25]  R. McKay,et al.  The mammary microenvironment alters the differentiation repertoire of neural stem cells , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[26]  B. Roysam,et al.  Adult SVZ stem cells lie in a vascular niche: a quantitative analysis of niche cell-cell interactions. , 2008, Cell stem cell.

[27]  Hideki Uosaki,et al.  Directed and Systematic Differentiation of Cardiovascular Cells From Mouse Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells , 2008, Circulation.

[28]  R. Zhao,et al.  New hope for cancer treatment: exploring the distinction between normal adult stem cells and cancer stem cells. , 2008, Pharmacology & therapeutics.

[29]  M. Hendrix,et al.  Human embryonic stem cell microenvironment suppresses the tumorigenic phenotype of aggressive cancer cells , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[30]  Sanchita Bhatnagar,et al.  Exosome Function: From Tumor Immunology to Pathogen Biology , 2008, Traffic.

[31]  M. Hendrix,et al.  The Epigenetic Influence of Tumor and Embryonic Microenvironments: How Different are They? , 2008, Cancer Microenvironment.

[32]  T. Ichisaka,et al.  Generation of germline-competent induced pluripotent stem cells , 2007, Nature.

[33]  David L. Mack,et al.  Interaction with the mammary microenvironment redirects spermatogenic cell fate in vivo , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[34]  S. Yamanaka,et al.  Induction of Pluripotent Stem Cells from Mouse Embryonic and Adult Fibroblast Cultures by Defined Factors , 2006, Cell.

[35]  K. Skorecki,et al.  The influence of a human embryonic stem cell-derived microenvironment on targeting of human solid tumor xenografts. , 2006, Cancer research.

[36]  M. Clarke,et al.  Self-renewal and solid tumor stem cells , 2004, Oncogene.

[37]  G. Dontu,et al.  In vitro propagation and transcriptional profiling of human mammary stem/progenitor cells. , 2003, Genes & development.

[38]  C. Bucana,et al.  Stat1 negatively regulates angiogenesis, tumorigenicity and metastasis of tumor cells , 2002, Oncogene.

[39]  H. Hosick,et al.  Establishment and characterization of a new murine mammary tumor cell line, balb/c-MC , 1987, In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology.