City of Superlatives

A number of urban theorists have recently deployed a specific type of rhetoric to support claims that their city—Las Vegas, Miami, Los Angeles—deserves paradigmatic status. Using “superlatives” and assertions that their city is “first” on one or another measure, they have slipped into an academic boosterism at odds with a critical theoretical enterprise. This article explores how urban theorists might position themselves in relation to the city. Based on the premise that all knowledge is situated, it argues for an urban theory that is both critical and engaged.

[1]  Martin J. Murray,et al.  Postmodern Urbanism , 2002 .

[2]  Clive Barnett,et al.  The cultural turn: fashion or progress in human geography? , 1998 .

[3]  Patricia Ticineto Clough,et al.  Feminist thought : desire, power, and academic discourse , 1996 .

[4]  Maureen E. Penfold.  Social Justice and the City , 1974 .

[5]  C. Rotella.  October Cities: The Redevelopment of Urban Literature , 1998 .

[6]  S. Toulmin.  Cosmopolis: The Hidden Agenda of Modernity , 1990 .

[7]  E. Soja,et al.  The city : Los Angeles and urban theory at the end of the twentieth century , 1996 .

[8]  S. Seidman.  The End of Sociological Theory: The Postmodern Hope , 1991 .

[9]  Nathan D. Miller.  Advocacy and Objectivity: A Crisis in the Professionalization of American Social Science, 1865–1905: Furner, Mary O.: Lexington: The University Press of Kentucky, 357 pp., Publication Date: April 12, 1975 , 1975 .

[10]  M. Kenney,et al.  The Paradigmatic City: Postindustrial Illusion and the Los Angeles School , 1999 .

[11]  The Search for Paradigms as a Hindrance to Understanding , 1970 .

[12]  J. Duncan.  Me(trope)olis: Or Hayden White Among the Urbanists , 1996 .

[13]  J. Nijman.  The Paradigmatic City , 2000 .

[14]  R. Williams.  What I Came to Say , 1989 .

[15]  Christopher Buswell,et al.  How the other half lives. , 2022, Nursing older people.

[16]  Sonya A. Michel.  :Poverty Knowledge: Social Science, Social Policy, and the Poor in Twentieth-Century U.S. History , 2003 .

[17]  A. Merrifield.  An American Aboriginal: A Review of C Wright Mills: Letters and Autobiographical Writings , 2001 .

[18]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[19]  Carl W. Condit,et al.  Nature's Metropolis: Chicago and the Great West , 1991 .

[20]  Peter Hall,et al.  The global city , 2010 .

[21]  J. Turner,et al.  The Impossible Science: An Institutional Analysis of American Sociology , 1990 .

[22]  J. Beall,et al.  Uniting a Divided City; Governance and Social Exclusion in Johannesburg , 2002 .

[23]  Luigi Tomasi.  The Tradition of the Chicago School of Sociology , 1998 .

[24]  Maureen A. Flanagan.  How Women Saved the City , 2002 .

[25]  Sharon Zukin,et al.  From Coney Island to Las Vegas in the Urban Imaginary , 1998 .

[26]  A. King.  Introduction: Cities, Texts and Paradigms , 1996 .

[27]  R. Warren,et al.  The community in America , 1964 .

[28]  Elspeth Graham,et al.  Postmodernism and the Social Sciences , 1992 .

[29]  D. K. Adams.  The Objectives of the U.S. Information Agency: Controversies and Analysis , 1969 .

[30]  D. Burton-Christie.  Ecology of Fear: Los Angeles and the Imagination of Disaster , 2000 .

[31]  Jennifer Robinson,et al.  Global and world cities: a view from off the map , 2002 .

[32]  M. Gottdiener,et al.  Las Vegas: The Social Production of an All-American City , 2000 .

[33]  Andrew Abbott,et al.  Time Matters: On Theory and Method , 2001 .

[34]  Ash Amin,et al.  The Ordinary City , 1997 .

[35]  S. Aronowitz.  The Last Good Job in America , 2001 .

[36]  Paul M. Hohenberg,et al.  The Making of Urban Europe 1000-1950 , 1985 .

[37]  J. Friedmann.  The World City Hypothesis , 1986 .

[38]  James T. Knauer.  Lectures On Kant’s Political Philosophy , 1987 .

[39]  C. Jensen-butler,et al.  Changing Cities , 1996 .

[40]  Urban Sociology, Capitalism and Modernity , 1993 .

[41]  Sharon Zukin.  The Cultures of the Cities , 1995 .

[42]  R. Rorty.  Contingency, irony, and solidarity: Contents , 1989 .

[43]  Simon Schama,et al.  Dead Certainties: Unwarranted Speculations , 1991 .

[44]  M. Dear.  Los Angeles and the Chicago School: Invitation to a Debate , 2002 .

[45]  Ian Spring,et al.  City of Quartz , 1992 .

[46]  D. Harvey.  Consciousness and the urban experience , 1985 .

[47]  C. Abbott.  Thinking about Cities , 1996 .

[48]  D. Harvey.  Spaces of Hope , 2000 .

[49]  R. A. Nelson,et al.  Common ground. , 2020, Lancet.

[50]  L. Duhl.  The shame of the cities. , 1968, The American journal of psychiatry.

[51]  E. Arvidson.  Cognitive Mapping and Class Politics: Towards a Nondeterminist Image of the City , 1995 .

[52]  J. Nijman,et al.  Globalization to a Latin Beat: The Miami Growth Machine , 1997 .

[53]  R. Sennett.  Respect in a World of Inequality , 2003 .

[54]  Joseph R. Gusfield,et al.  Literary Rhetoric of Science - Comedy and Pathos in Drinking Driver Research , 1976 .

[55]  R. Lindner,et al.  The Reportage of Urban Culture: Robert Park and the Chicago School , 1996 .

[56]  M. Dear,et al.  From Chicago to L.A. : making sense of urban theory , 2002 .