Pupillographic campimetry: an objective method to measure the visual field

Abstract Pupillographic campimetry allows measuring the visual field objectively by analyzing the pupil response to perimetric stimuli. One of the drawbacks of this technique, similar to static perimetry, is the need of reliable fixation of the subject. By using stimulus sizes comparable to static perimetry and applying gaze tracking, we enable a retinotopic visual field examination regardless of fixation problems and with an increased stability and improved spatial resolution. Here, we present the results of applying the method in eight normal sighted subjects as well as in three patients suffering from diseases usually diagnosed by perimetry. The results in normal sighted subjects show a reduction in the amplitude of the pupil response with increasing eccentricity as expected. We also demonstrate that gaze-controlled campimetry is able to detect organic visual field defects objectively in a patient group and classify the visual field defects without an organic background. Moreover, we show that our method is able to evaluate the visual field sensitivity loss beyond classical perimetry in patients with late-stage retinitis pigmentosa. Thus, gaze-controlled pupil campimetry can be used in addition to classical perimetry, allowing for an objective monitoring of disease progression, rendering it as a biomarker for novel treatments.

[1]  T. Yoshitomi,et al.  Comparison of threshold visual perimetry and objective pupil perimetry in clinical patients. , 1999, Journal of neuro-ophthalmology : the official journal of the North American Neuro-Ophthalmology Society.

[2]  H. Wilhelm,et al.  Pupil campimetry in patients with visual field loss , 2005, European journal of neurology.

[3]  H. Lüdtke,et al.  How sensitive is pupil campimetry in hemifield loss? , 2009, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[4]  B. Wilhelm,et al.  Analysis of retinal function using chromatic pupillography in retinitis pigmentosa and the relationship to electrically evoked phosphene thresholds , 2017, Acta ophthalmologica.

[5]  Donald C Hood,et al.  Toward a clinical protocol for assessing rod, cone, and melanopsin contributions to the human pupil response. , 2011, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[6]  Aki Kawasaki,et al.  Intrinsically Photosensitive Retinal Ganglion Cells , 2007, Journal of neuro-ophthalmology : the official journal of the North American Neuro-Ophthalmology Society.

[7]  A. Milam,et al.  Preservation of the inner retina in retinitis pigmentosa. A morphometric analysis. , 1997, Archives of ophthalmology.

[8]  F. Bremner,et al.  Pupil Perimetry in the Diagnosis of Functional Visual Field Loss , 2002 .

[9]  Robert C. Bolles,et al.  Random sample consensus: a paradigm for model fitting with applications to image analysis and automated cartography , 1981, CACM.

[10]  B. Wilhelm,et al.  Pupillomotor campimetry in normals , 2000 .

[11]  Dongheng Li,et al.  Starburst: A hybrid algorithm for video-based eye tracking combining feature-based and model-based approaches , 2005, 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05) - Workshops.

[12]  R. Kardon,et al.  Automated pupil perimetry. Pupil field mapping in patients and normal subjects. , 1991, Ophthalmology.

[13]  A. James,et al.  The pupillary response to color and luminance variant multifocal stimuli. , 2013, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.