Precautionary principles: general definitions and specific applications to genetically modified organisms

Precautionary principles have been proposed as a fundamental element of sound risk management. Their advocates see them as guiding action in the face of uncertainty, encouraging the adoption of measures that reduce serious risks to health, safety, and the environment. Their opponents may reject the very idea of precautionary principles, find specific principles unacceptably vague or see them as clearly doing economic damage-either to society as a whole or to their own interests. This article traces the development of alternative precautionary principles, primarily in Europe. Their adequacy is considered in one context where such principles have often been invoked, using genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in agriculture. Although some precautionary principles can be given analytical rigor, the concerns that they express strain the intellectual and institutional structure of conventional policy analysis. © 2002 by the Association for Policy Analysis and Management.

[1]  P. Christou.  No Credible Scientific Evidence is Presented to Support Claims that Transgenic DNA was Introgressed into Traditional Maize Landraces in Oaxaca, Mexico , 2002, Transgenic Research.

[2]  Clive James,et al.  Global review of commercialized transgenic crops , 2003 .

[3]  John D. Graham,et al.  Europe's precautionary principle: promise and pitfalls , 2002 .

[4]  Richard T. Roush,et al.  ACTIVE ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT IN INSECT PEST AND WEED CONTROL: INTERVENTION WITH A PLAN FOR LEARNING , 2002 .

[5]  D. Quist,et al.  Transgenic DNA introgressed into traditional maize landraces in Oaxaca, Mexico , 2001, Nature.

[6]  I. Fischhoff,et al.  Will They Hate Us? Anticipating Unacceptable Risks , 2001 .

[7]  R. Dalton.  Transgenic corn found growing in Mexico , 2001, Nature.

[8]  J. Pleasants,et al.  Temporal and spatial overlap between monarch larvae and corn pollen , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  J. Losey,et al.  Assessing the impact of Cry1Ab-expressing corn pollen on monarch butterfly larvae in field studies , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  Richard L. Hellmich,et al.  Impact of Bt corn pollen on monarch butterfly populations: A risk assessment , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  Ilya R. Fischhoff,et al.  Investing in Frankenfirms: Predicting Socially Unacceptable Risks , 2001 .

[12]  Joyce Tait,et al.  More Faust than Frankenstein: the European debate about the precautionary principle and risk regulation for genetically modified crops , 2001 .

[13]  D. Quist,et al.  Transgenic DNA introgressed into traditional maize in Oaxaca, Mexico , 2001 .

[14]  M. Marvier.  Ecology of Transgenic Crops , 2001, American Scientist.

[15]  L. L,et al.  The ecological risks and benefits of genetically engineered plants. , 2000, Science.

[16]  J. Obrycki,et al.  Field deposition of Bt transgenic corn pollen: lethal effects on the monarch butterfly , 2000, Oecologia.

[17]  L. Firbank,et al.  Genetically Modified Crops and Farmland Biodiversity , 2000, Science.

[18]  R. Freckleton,et al.  Predictions of biodiversity response to genetically modified herbicide-tolerant crops. , 2000, Science.

[19]  D. Pimentel,et al.  Bt corn pollen impacts on nontarget lepidoptera: assessment of effects in nature. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  A. Stirling.  On `precautionary' and `science based' approaches to risk assessment and environmental appraisal , 2000 .

[21]  K. Schierenbeck,et al.  Hybridization as a stimulus for the evolution of invasiveness in plants , 2000 .

[22]  R. Hartzler,et al.  Occurrence of common milkweed (Asclepias syriaca) in cropland and adjacent areas , 2000 .

[23]  Aarti Gupta.  Governing Trade in Genetically Modified Organisms: The Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety , 2000 .

[24]  Peter H. Sand,et al.  The Precautionary Principle: A European Perspective , 2000 .

[25]  C. Benbrook,et al.  Transgenic Crops: A Cautionary Tale , 2000, Science.

[26]  Warwick Gullett,et al.  Protecting Public Health and the Environment: Implementing the Precautionary Principle , 2000 .

[27]  Juliet D. Tang,et al.  Field tests on managing resistance to Bt-engineered plants , 2000, Nature Biotechnology.

[28]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Scientific management of science? , 2000 .

[29]  George Gaskell,et al.  AGRICULTURAL BIOTECHNOLOGY AND PUBLIC ATTITUDES IN THE EUROPEAN UNION , 2000 .

[30]  D. Saxena,et al.  Transgenic plants: Insecticidal toxin in root exudates from Bt corn , 1999, Nature.

[31]  A. Shelton,et al.  False reports and the ears of men , 1999, Nature Biotechnology.

[32]  Anne Fairbrother,et al.  Ecological Risk Assessment and the Precautionary Principle , 1999 .

[33]  B. Tabashnik,et al.  Development time and resistance to Bt crops , 1999, Nature.

[34]  Beatriz Arroyo,et al.  A review of the abundance and diversity of invertebrate and plant foods of granivorous birds in northern europe in relation to agricultural change , 1999 .

[35]  I. Bernstein,et al.  Immune responses in farm workers after exposure to Bacillus thuringiensis pesticides. , 1999, Environmental health perspectives.

[36]  J. Beringer.  Cautionary tale on safety of GM crops , 1999, Nature.

[37]  J. Losey,et al.  Transgenic pollen harms monarch larvae , 1999, Nature.

[38]  Higgins,et al.  Inheritance of resistance to bacillus thuringiensis toxin (Dipel ES) in the european corn borer , 1999, Science.

[39]  A. Giddens.  Risk and Responsibility , 1999 .

[40]  C. Benbrook.  Evidence of the Magnitude and Consequences of the Roundup Ready Soybean Yield Drag from University- Based Varietal Trials in 1998 , 1999 .

[41]  David Santillo,et al.  The precautionary principle: Protecting against failures of scientific method and risk assessment , 1998 .

[42]  H. Tapp,et al.  Persistence of the insecticidal toxin from Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. kurstaki in soil , 1998 .

[43]  A. Hilbeck,et al.  Effects of transgenic Bacillus thuringiensis corn-fed prey on mortality and development time of immature Chrysoperla cornea (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) , 1998 .

[44]  A. Jordan.  EU Environmental Policy at 25: The Politics of Multinational Governance , 1998 .

[45]  B. Tabashnik.  Insect resistance to Bt revisited , 1997, Nature Biotechnology.

[46]  L. Thompson,et al.  The Mind and Heart of the Negotiator , 1997 .

[47]  G. Loewenstein,et al.  Explaining the Identifiable Victim Effect , 1997 .

[48]  T. Mosedale,et al.  THE PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLE AS A NORM OF CUSTOMARY INTERNATIONAL LAW , 1997 .

[49]  C. Marris,et al.  Integrating sociological and psychological approaches to public perceptions of environmental risks: detailed results from a questionnaire survey , 1996 .

[50]  John S. Gray,et al.  Towards a scientific definition of the precautionary principle , 1996 .

[51]  J. Nordlee,et al.  Identification of a Brazil-nut allergen in transgenic soybeans. , 1996, The New England journal of medicine.

[52]  D. Vogel.  Trading Up: Consumer and Environmental Regulation in a Global Economy , 1997 .

[53]  Jerome R. Ravetz,et al.  Uncertainty, complexity and post-normal science , 1994 .

[54]  Baruch Fischhoff,et al.  What forecasts (seem to) mean , 1994 .

[55]  Ahmad Husseini,et al.  Canadian standards association , 1993 .

[56]  H Roberts,et al.  Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity , 1994 .

[57]  Peter J. Taylor,et al.  The Precautionary Principle and the Prevention of Marine Pollution , 1992 .

[58]  Unced.  Rio Declaration on Environment and Development , 1992 .

[59]  John S. Gray,et al.  Scientifically based strategies for marine environmental protection and management , 1991 .

[60]  E. Hey.  The precautionary approach: Implications of the revision of the Oslo and Paris Conventions☆ , 1991 .

[61]  H. Weidner.  Umweltpolitik - auf alten Wegen zu einer internationalen Spitzenstellung , 1991 .

[62]  Jerome R. Ravetz,et al.  Uncertainty and Quality in Science for Policy , 1990 .

[63]  John S. Gray,et al.  Statistics and the precautionary principle , 1990 .

[64]  A. Giddens.  The consequences of modernity , 1990 .

[65]  M. O'hare,et al.  Searching for Safety , 1990 .

[66]  P. Slovic.  Perception of risk. , 1987, Science.

[67]  S. Jasanoff,et al.  Controlling Chemicals: The Politics of Regulation in Europe and the United States , 1985 .

[68]  Baruch Fischhoff,et al.  Characterizing Perceived Risk , 1985 .

[69]  Baruch Fischhoff,et al.  Setting Standards: A Systematic Approach to Managing Public Health and Safety Risks , 1984 .

[70]  L. Lundqvist,et al.  The hare and the tortoise, clean air policies in the United States and Sweden, by L.J. Lundqvist. Canada: University of Michigan Press, and New York: Wiley, 1980, 236 pp. No price given , 1983 .

[71]  Baruch Fischhoff,et al.  “Acceptable risk”: The case of nuclear power , 1983 .

[72]  K. Wey.  Umweltpolitik in Deutschland , 1982 .

[73]  Sandra L. Albrecht,et al.  Regulating America, Regulating Sweden: A Comparative Study of Occupational Safety and Health Policy. , 1981 .

[74]  Harold W. Lewis,et al.  The Safety of Fission Reactors , 1980 .

[75]  Talbot Page,et al.  A Generic View of Toxic Chemicals and Similar Risks , 1978 .

[76]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Cost benefit analysis and the art of motorcycle maintenance , 1977 .

[77]  A. Tversky,et al.  BELIEF IN THE LAW OF SMALL NUMBERS , 1971, Pediatrics.

[78]  Hilary Rose,et al.  Science and Society , 1969 .