The International Journal of Biostatistics CAUSAL INFERENCE Dynamic Regime Marginal Structural Mean Models for Estimation of Optimal Dynamic Treatment Regimes , Part I : Main Content

Dynamic treatment regimes are set rules for sequential decision making based on patient covariate history. Observational studies are well suited for the investigation of the effects of dynamic treatment regimes because of the variability in treatment decisions found in them. This variability exists because different physicians make different decisions in the face of similar patient histories. In this article we describe an approach to estimate the optimal dynamic treatment regime among a set of enforceable regimes. This set is comprised by regimes defined by simple rules based on a subset of past information. The regimes in the set are indexed by a Euclidean vector. The optimal regime is the one that maximizes the expected counterfactual utility over all regimes in the set. We discuss assumptions under which it is possible to identify the optimal regime from observational longitudinal data. Murphy et al. (2001) developed efficient augmented inverse probability weighted estimators of the expected utility of one fixed regime. Our methods are based on an extension of the marginal structural mean model of Robins (1998, 1999) which incorporate the estimation ideas of Murphy et al. (2001). Our models, which we call dynamic regime marginal structural mean models, are specially suitable for estimating the optimal treatment regime in a moderately small class of enforceable regimes of interest. We consider both parametric and semiparametric dynamic regime marginal structural models. We discuss locally efficient, double-robust estimation of the model parameters and of the index of the optimal treatment regime in the set. In a companion paper in this issue of the journal we provide proofs of the main results.

[1]  D. Luenberger.  Optimization by Vector Space Methods , 1968 .

[2]  Donald B. Rubin,et al.  Bayesian Inference for Causal Effects: The Role of Randomization , 1978 .

[3]  W. Newey,et al.  Large sample estimation and hypothesis testing , 1986 .

[4]  J. Robins.  A new approach to causal inference in mortality studies with a sustained exposure period—application to control of the healthy worker survivor effect , 1986 .

[5]  J. Robins.  Addendum to “a new approach to causal inference in mortality studies with a sustained exposure period—application to control of the healthy worker survivor effect” , 1987 .

[6]  J. Robins.  Errata to “a new approach to causal intefence in mortality studies with a sustained exposure period—application to control of the healthy worker survivor effect” Mathl Modelling 7(9–12), 1393–1512 (1986) , 1987 .

[7]  D. Rubin.  [On the Application of Probability Theory to Agricultural Experiments. Essay on Principles. Section 9.] Comment: Neyman (1923) and Causal Inference in Experiments and Observational Studies , 1990 .

[8]  J. Robins,et al.  Recovery of Information and Adjustment for Dependent Censoring Using Surrogate Markers , 1992 .

[9]  J. Robins,et al.  Estimation of Regression Coefficients When Some Regressors are not Always Observed , 1994 .

[10]  James M. Robins,et al.  Causal Inference from Complex Longitudinal Data , 1997 .

[11]  James M. Robins,et al.  Coarsening at Random: Characterizations, Conjectures, Counter-Examples , 1997 .

[12]  James M. Robins,et al.  On Profile Likelihood: Comment , 2000 .

[13]  James M. Robins,et al.  Marginal Structural Models versus Structural nested Models as Tools for Causal inference , 2000 .

[14]  J. Robins,et al.  Marginal structural models to estimate the causal effect of zidovudine on the survival of HIV-positive men. , 2000, Epidemiology.

[15]  J M Robins,et al.  Marginal Mean Models for Dynamic Regimes , 2001, Journal of the American Statistical Association.

[16]  J. Robins.  Analytic Methods for Estimating HIV-Treatment and Cofactor Effects , 2002 .

[17]  S. Murphy,et al.  Optimal dynamic treatment regimes , 2003 .

[18]  James M. Robins,et al.  Unified Methods for Censored Longitudinal Data and Causality , 2003 .

[19]  James M. Robins,et al.  Optimal Structural Nested Models for Optimal Sequential Decisions , 2004 .

[20]  A. Tsiatis.  Semiparametric Theory and Missing Data , 2006 .

[21]  M. J. Laan.  Causal Effect Models for Intention to Treat and Realistic Individualized Treatment Rules , 2006 .

[22]  M. J. van der Laan,et al.  Causal Effect Models for Realistic Individualized Treatment and Intention to Treat Rules , 2007, The international journal of biostatistics.

[23]  J. Robins,et al.  Estimation and extrapolation of optimal treatment and testing strategies , 2008, Statistics in medicine.

[24]  Mark J van der Laan,et al.  Analyzing sequentially randomized trials based on causal effect models for realistic individualized treatment rules , 2008, Statistics in medicine.

[25]  S. Vansteelandt,et al.  Marginal structural models for partial exposure regimes. , 2008, Biostatistics.

[26]  James M Robins,et al.  Dynamic Regime Marginal Structural Mean Models for Estimation of Optimal Dynamic Treatment Regimes, Part II: Proofs of Results , 2010, The international journal of biostatistics.