Stress distributions within the proximal femur during gait and falls: Implications for osteoporotic fracture

The rates of fracture at sites with different relative amounts of cortical and trabecular bone (hip, spine, distal radius) have been used to make inferences about the pathomechanics of bone loss and the existence of type I and type II osteoporosis. However, fracture risk is directly related to the ratio of tissue stress to tissue strength, which in turn is dependent not only on tissue composition but also tissue geometry and the direction and magnitude of loading. These three elements determine how the load is distributed within the tissue. As a result, assumptions on the relative structural importance of cortical and trabecular bone, and how these tissues are affected by bone loss, can be inaccurate if based on regional tissue composition and bone density alone. To investigate the structural significance of cortical and trabecular bone in the proximal femur, and how it is affected by bone loss, we determined the stress distributions in a normal and osteoporotic femur resulting from loadings representing: (1) gait; and (2) a fall to the side with impact onto the greater trochanter. A three-dimensional finite element model was generated based on a representative femur selected from a large database of femoral geometries. Stresses were analyzed throughout the femoral neck and intertrochanteric regions. We found that the percentage of total load supported by cortical and trabecular bone was approximately constant for all load cases but differed depending on location. Cortical bone carried 30% of the load at the subcapital region, 50% at the mid-neck, 96% at the base of the neck and 80% at the intertrochanteric region. These values differ from the widely held assumption that cortical bone carries 75% of the load in the femoral neck and 50% of the load at the intertrochanteric region. During gait, the principal stresses were concentrated within the primary compressive system of trabeculae and in the cortical bone of the intertrochanteric region. In contrast, during a fall, the trabecular stresses were concentrated within the primary tensile system of trabeculae with a peak magnitude 4.3 times that present during gait. While the distribution of stress for the osteoporotic femur was similar to the normal, the magnitude of peak stress was increased by between 33% and 45%. These data call into question several assumptions which serve as the basis for theories on the pathomechanics of osteoporosis. In addition, we expect that the insight provided by this analysis will result in the improved development and interpretation of non-invasive techniques for the quantification of in vivo hip fracture risk.

[1]  W C Hayes,et al.  Prediction of femoral impact forces in falls on the hip. , 1991, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[2]  Hwj Rik Huiskes,et al.  A detailed comparison of experimental and theoretical stress-analysis of a human femur , 1983 .

[3]  S BACKMAN,et al.  The proximal end of the femur: investigations with special reference to the etiology of femoral neck fractures; anatomical studies; roentgen projections; theoretical stress calculations; experimental production of fractures. , 1957, Acta radiologica. Supplementum.

[4]  W. Hayes,et al.  Mechanical properties of trabecular bone from the proximal femur: a quantitative CT study. , 1990, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[5]  W. Peck Falls and hip fracture in the elderly. , 1986, Hospital practice.

[6]  V. Frankel,et al.  ANALYSIS OF FORCES PRODUCING FRACTURES OF THE PROXIMAL END OF THE FEMUR , 1960 .

[7]  W C Hayes,et al.  Mechanical properties of metaphyseal bone in the proximal femur. , 1991, Journal of biomechanics.

[8]  W. Hayes,et al.  Impact near the hip dominates fracture risk in elderly nursing home residents who fall , 1993, Calcified Tissue International.

[9]  J. Wolff Das Gesetz der Transformation der Knochen , 1893 .

[10]  J. Margulies,et al.  Fracture of the human femoral neck: effect of density of the cancellous core. , 1984, Journal of biomedical engineering.

[11]  R. Hinton,et al.  The association of age, race, and sex with the location of proximal femoral fractures in the elderly. , 1993, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[12]  J. G. Evans,et al.  Relevance of osteoporosis in women with fracture of the femoral neck , 1984 .

[13]  W. Hayes,et al.  Sex differences in age‐related remodeling of the femur and tibia , 1988, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[14]  H. R. Lissner,et al.  Biomechanics Of Human Motion , 1962 .

[15]  Intracapsular fractures of the neck of the femur. , 1970, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[16]  R. Mazess On aging bone loss. , 1982, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[17]  R Van Audekercke,et al.  The mechanical characteristics of cancellous bone at the upper femoral region. , 1983, Journal of biomechanics.

[18]  M. Scheck The significance of posterior comminution in femoral neck fractures. , 1980, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[19]  W. Hayes,et al.  Cross-sectional geometry of Pecos Pueblo femora and tibiae--a biomechanical investigation: I. Method and general patterns of variation. , 1983, American journal of physical anthropology.

[20]  L. Melton,et al.  Risk factors for injury after a fall. , 1985, Clinics in geriatric medicine.

[21]  W C Hayes,et al.  Cross-sectional geometry of Pecos Pueblo femora and tibiae--a biomechanical investigation: II. Sex, age, side differences. , 1983, American journal of physical anthropology.

[22]  P. Alffram AN EPIDEMIOLOGIC STUDY OF CERVICAL AND TROCHANTERIC FRACTURES OF THE FEMUR IN AN URBAN POPULATION. ANALYSIS OF 1,664 CASES WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO ETIOLOGIC FACTORS. , 1964, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica. Supplementum.

[23]  S R Simon,et al.  An evaluation of the approaches of optimization models in the prediction of muscle forces during human gait. , 1981, Journal of biomechanics.

[24]  T. Brown,et al.  Mechanical property distributions in the cancellous bone of the human proximal femur. , 1980, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[25]  Roy D. Crowninshield,et al.  Use of Optimization Techniques to Predict Muscle Forces , 1978 .

[26]  L. Melton,et al.  Evidence for two distinct syndromes of involutional osteoporosis. , 1983, The American journal of medicine.

[27]  W. Hayes,et al.  Fracture prediction for the proximal femur using finite element models: Part I--Linear analysis. , 1991, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[28]  W C Hayes,et al.  Finite element modeling of damage accumulation in trabecular bone under cyclic loading. , 1994, Journal of biomechanics.

[29]  W. Hayes,et al.  The compressive behavior of bone as a two-phase porous structure. , 1977, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[30]  A. Parfitt,et al.  Bone age, mineral density, and fatigue damage , 2005, Calcified Tissue International.

[31]  W. Hayes,et al.  Stress analysis of a condylar knee tibial component: Influence of metaphyseal shell properties and cement injection depth , 1985, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[32]  C. Schnitzler Bone quality: A determinant for certain risk factors for bone fragility , 2005, Calcified Tissue International.

[33]  D R Pedersen,et al.  A measurement of proximal femur strain with total hip arthroplasty. , 1980, Journal of Biomechanical Engineering.

[34]  J H Keyak,et al.  Validation of an automated method of three-dimensional finite element modelling of bone. , 1993, Journal of biomedical engineering.

[35]  A Heinonen,et al.  Epidemiology of hip fractures. , 1996, Bone.

[36]  J. F. Williams,et al.  An experimental stress analysis of the neck of the femur , 1971, Medical and biological engineering.

[37]  W. Hayes,et al.  Fracture prediction for the proximal femur using finite element models: Part II--Nonlinear analysis. , 1991, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[38]  A. Ahlbom,et al.  Hip fracture incidence in Stockholm 1972-1981. , 1986, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[39]  L. Mosekilde,et al.  Normal vertebral body size and compressive strength: relations to age and to vertebral and iliac trabecular bone compressive strength. , 1986, Bone.

[40]  W C Hayes,et al.  The use of quantitative computed tomography to estimate risk of fracture of the hip from falls. , 1990, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[41]  A Rohlmann,et al.  Finite-element-analysis and experimental investigation in a femur with hip endoprosthesis. , 1983, Journal of biomechanics.

[42]  L D SMITH,et al.  Hip fractures; the role of muscle contraction or intrinsic forces in the causation of fractures of the femoral neck. , 1953, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[43]  H W Wahner,et al.  Changes in bone mineral density of the proximal femur and spine with aging. Differences between the postmenopausal and senile osteoporosis syndromes. , 1982, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[44]  W C Hayes,et al.  Fall severity and bone mineral density as risk factors for hip fracture in ambulatory elderly. , 1994, JAMA.

[45]  S. Cowin,et al.  On the dependence of the elasticity and strength of cancellous bone on apparent density. , 1988, Journal of biomechanics.

[46]  W C Hayes,et al.  Age-related reductions in the strength of the femur tested in a fall-loading configuration. , 1995, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[47]  W C Hutton,et al.  The mechanical properties of bone in osteoporosis. , 1981, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[48]  G. Andersson,et al.  Epidemiology of hip fractures in Göteborg, Sweden, 1940-1983. , 1984, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.