Affect, risk, and decision criticality: Replication and extension in a business setting

Abstract Results from a field study with 113 members of an international engineering company indicate that a decision maker's response to an organizational dilemma with uncertain outcomes is a function of task-related affect, perceived risk, and perceived decision criticality. While results were not wholly consistent with lab findings reported by Isen and Patrick (1983) and Isen and Geva (1987) , these field data indicate that business people adjust their decision making preferences in much the same manner as student subjects used in prior affect investigations. Further, the current study extends our understanding of affect and decision making in four ways: (1) using trained business people as subjects, (2) performing a task germane to the organization, (3) examining negative affect as an influential mood state, and (4) incorporating perceived decision criticality as a salient factor in the decision process. Findings are discussed relative to current research on affect and the role it plays in decision making.

[1]  D Hunter,et al.  Eliminate the negative. , 1989, The Health service journal.

[2]  Michael Ross,et al.  Impact of causal attributions on affective reactions to success and failure. , 1982 .

[3]  Edward McAuley,et al.  Causal attributions, causal dimensions, and affective reactions to success and failure , 1986 .

[4]  Eliot R. Smith,et al.  Cognitive and social bases of emotional experience: Outcome, attribution, and affect. , 1982 .

[5]  J. Ford The Effects of Causal Attributions on Decision Makers' Responses to Performance Downturns , 1985 .

[6]  J. Harvey,et al.  New Directions in Attribution Research , 2018 .

[7]  A. Isen,et al.  The effect of positive feelings on risk taking: When the chips are down. , 1983 .

[8]  Kurt Kraiger,et al.  The influence of positive affective states on task perceptions and satisfaction , 1989 .

[9]  A. Schiffenbauer,et al.  Effect of observer's emotional state on judgments of the emotional state of others. , 1974, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[10]  Maryanne M. Mowen,et al.  AN EMPIRICAL EXAMINATION OF THE BIASING EFFECTS OF FRAMING ON BUSINESS DECISIONS , 1986 .

[11]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. , 1977 .

[12]  A. Bandura,et al.  Social Cognitive Theory of Organizational Management , 1989 .

[13]  A. Isen,et al.  Affect, accessibility of material in memory, and behavior: a cognitive loop? , 1978, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[14]  A. Isen,et al.  The influence of positive affect on acceptable level of risk: The person with a large canoe has a large worry , 1987 .

[15]  A. Bandura,et al.  Cultivating competence, self-efficacy, and intrinsic interest through proximal self-motivation. , 1981 .

[16]  A. Isen,et al.  The effect of feeling state on evaluation of positive, neutral, and negative stimuli: When you "accentuate the positive," do you "eliminate the negative"? , 1982 .

[17]  Paul Slovic,et al.  Response-induced reversals of preference in gambling: An extended replication in las vegas , 1973 .

[18]  Daniel W. Russell,et al.  The cognition–emotion process in achievement-related contexts. , 1979 .

[19]  I. Janis,et al.  Decision Making: A Psychological Analysis of Conflict, Choice, and Commitment , 1977 .