Differential social attributions toward computing technology: An empirical investigation

A debate exists as to whether social cues should be intentionally designed into the user interface. Some have argued that such interfaces will improve comfort with the interface, create a more natural interaction and improve productivity, although others have argued that these interfaces will lead individuals to ascribe characteristics and responsibilities to computing technology that it does not have. Despite the debate, limited research has focused on the impact these interfaces have on how people ascribe responsibility to computing technology. Drawing from social psychology, empirical work regarding social responses toward computing technology, and attribution theory, this research empirically tests a model developed by Marakas et al. [2000. A theoretical model of differential social attributions toward computing technology: when the metaphor becomes the model. International Journal of Human Computer Studies 52, 719-750] which identifies and explains several of the factors that contribute to differential social attributions toward computing technology. Using data from 240 students and professionals, results from a laboratory study indicate that attributions toward computing technology are influenced by an individual's core self-evaluations, their generalized beliefs about the social role of computing technology and the nature of the computer interface used. Specifically, the results provide support for the argument that certain individuals do indeed attribute independent agency to computing technology and respond accordingly, and that this propensity is magnified when exposed to a computer with a distinctly social interface. Implications for both the applied and academic research communities are discussed.

[1]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  An Experimental Investigation of the Impact of Computer Based Decision Aids on Decision Making Strategies , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[2]  L. E. Pate,et al.  Understanding Human Behaviour , 1987 .

[3]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Validating Instruments in MIS Research , 1989, MIS Q..

[4]  Youngme Moon Intimate Exchanges: Using Computers to Elicit Self-Disclosure from Consumers , 2000 .

[5]  D. Christopher Dryer,et al.  Getting Personal with Computers: How to Design Personalities for Agents , 1999, Appl. Artif. Intell..

[6]  Richard D. Johnson,et al.  The Multilevel and Multifaceted Character of Computer Self-Efficacy: Toward Clarification of the Construct and an Integrative Framework for Research , 1998, Inf. Syst. Res..

[7]  Terry Winograd,et al.  Understanding computers and cognition - a new foundation for design , 1987 .

[8]  Edward Barrett Text, ConText, and HyperText: Writing with and for the Computer , 1991 .

[9]  J. McConnell Understanding Human Behavior , 1986 .

[10]  Rudy Hirschheim,et al.  Four paradigms of information systems development , 1989, CACM.

[11]  H. Levenson,et al.  Multidimensional locus of control in psychiatric patients. , 1973, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[12]  B. J. Fogg,et al.  Can computer personalities be human personalities? , 1995, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[13]  T. Judge,et al.  Relationship of core self-evaluations traits--self-esteem, generalized self-efficacy, locus of control, and emotional stability--with job satisfaction and job performance: a meta-analysis. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[14]  C. Nass,et al.  How “Real” Are Computer Personalities? , 1996 .

[15]  Joyce J. Elam,et al.  Semantic Structuring in Analyst Acquisition and Representation of Facts in Requirements Analysis , 1998, Inf. Syst. Res..

[16]  Clifford Nass,et al.  The media equation - how people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places , 1996 .

[17]  H. Kelley The processes of causal attribution. , 1973 .

[18]  B. Shneiderman A nonanthropomorphic style guide: overcoming the humpty dumpty syndrome , 1989 .

[19]  C. Ward Struthers,et al.  Effects of Causal Attributions on Personnel Decisions: A Social Motivation Perspective , 1998 .

[20]  Henrietta Nickels Shirk Technical writers as computer scientists: the challenges of online documentation , 1991 .

[21]  M. Rosenberg Society and the adolescent self-image , 1966 .

[22]  William T. Ross,et al.  The Role of Attributions in Customer Satisfaction: A Re-Examination , 2004 .

[23]  Lorne Olfman,et al.  The Importance of Learning Style in End-User Training , 1990, MIS Q..

[24]  Suzanne K. Damarin,et al.  The second self: Computers and the human spirit , 1985 .

[25]  A. Bandura Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy.

[26]  R. Warner,et al.  Attributions of Personality Based on Physical Appearance, Speech, and Handwriting , 1986 .

[27]  W. Gardner,et al.  Perceptions of politics and organizational cynicism: An attributional and leader–member exchange perspective , 2004 .

[28]  Philip A. Griswold Some Determinants of Computer Awareness Among Education Majors. , 1983 .

[29]  B. J. Fogg,et al.  Silicon sycophants: the effects of computers that flatter , 1997, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[30]  George M. Marakas,et al.  Tool or social actor? factors contributing to differential social attributions toward computing technology , 2001 .

[31]  C. Nass,et al.  Machines and Mindlessness , 2000 .

[32]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction , 1998 .

[33]  E. A. Locke,et al.  Dispositional effects on job and life satisfaction: the role of core evaluations. , 1998, The Journal of applied psychology.

[34]  Lee Sproull,et al.  When the Interface Is a Face , 1996, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[35]  Dale H. Schunk,et al.  Self-Efficacy and Skill Development: Influence of Task Strategies and Attributions , 1986 .

[36]  B. Weiner An attributional theory of motivation and emotion , 1986 .

[37]  Marilyn E. Gist,et al.  Responses to Successful and Unsuccessful Performance: The Moderating Effect of Self-Efficacy on the Relationship between Performance and Attributions , 1995 .

[38]  Daniel L. Slotnick,et al.  Computer Graphics and Resistance to Technology , 1970 .

[39]  D. J. Lee Society and the Adolescent Self-Image , 1969 .

[40]  S. Turkle Life on the Screen: Identity in the Age of the Internet , 1997 .

[41]  J. M. Digman PERSONALITY STRUCTURE: EMERGENCE OF THE FIVE-FACTOR MODEL , 1990 .

[42]  A. Tellegen,et al.  PERSONALITY PROCESSES AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES An Alternative "Description of Personality": The Big-Five Factor Structure , 2022 .

[43]  S. Bem,et al.  The Lenses of Gender: Transforming the Debate on Sexual Inequality , 1993 .

[44]  Association of Teachers of Technical Writing , 2002 .

[45]  Agnes Werner,et al.  An attributional explanation of individual resistance to the introduction of information technologies in the workplace , 1996, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[46]  A. Bandura GUIDE FOR CONSTRUCTING SELF-EFFICACY SCALES , 2006 .

[47]  T. Judge,et al.  The Power of Being Positive: The Relation Between Positive Self-Concept and job Performance , 1998 .

[48]  D. Robey Cognitive Style and DSS Design: A Comment on Huber's Paper , 1983 .

[49]  D. Schunk Self-Efficacy Perspective On Achievement Behavior , 1984 .

[50]  M MarakasGeorge,et al.  The Multilevel and Multifaceted Character of Computer Self-Efficacy , 1998 .

[51]  H. Kelley,et al.  Attribution theory and research. , 1980, Annual review of psychology.

[52]  Mitchell J. Neubert,et al.  The Impact of Poor Performers on Team Outcomes: An Empirical Examination of Attribution Theory , 2004 .

[53]  T. Judge,et al.  Relationship of core self-evaluations to goal setting, motivation, and performance. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[54]  F. Heider The psychology of interpersonal relations , 1958 .

[55]  Paul Resnik,et al.  The Influence of Self-Esteem on Cognitive Responses to Machine-Like versus Human-Like Computer Feedback , 1985 .

[56]  Richard D. Johnson,et al.  Research Report: The Role of Behavioral Modeling in Computer Skills Acquisition: Toward Refinement of the Model , 2000, Inf. Syst. Res..

[57]  M. L. Gibson,et al.  An attribution model of decision support systems (DSS) usage , 1987, Inf. Manag..

[58]  Edward Barrett Technical Writers as Computer Scientists: The Challenges of Online Documentation , 1991 .

[59]  B. Weiner An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. , 1985, Psychological review.

[60]  Richard P. Will,et al.  True and false dependence on technology: Evaluation with an expert system , 1991 .

[61]  Gregory J. E. Rawlins Slaves of the Machine: The Quickening of Computer Technology , 1997 .

[62]  Clifford Nass,et al.  Are Computers Gender-Neutral? Gender Stereotypic Responses to Computers , 1997 .

[63]  Robin Kay,et al.  The Relation Between Locus of Control and Computer Literacy , 1990 .

[64]  C. Nass,et al.  Are Machines Gender Neutral? Gender‐Stereotypic Responses to Computers With Voices , 1997 .

[65]  C. Nass,et al.  Are People Polite to Computers? Responses to Computer-Based Interviewing Systems1 , 1999 .

[66]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Designing the user interface (2nd ed.): strategies for effective human-computer interaction , 1992 .

[67]  Clifford Nass,et al.  Machines, social attributions, and ethopoeia: performance assessments of computers subsequent to "self-" or "other-" evaluations , 1994, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[68]  C BASS,et al.  Understanding human behavior. , 1951, The Optometric weekly.

[69]  Cindy Gallois,et al.  LEADER ATTRIBUTIONS AND EVALUATIONS - EFFECTS OF LOCUS OF CONTROL, SUPERVISORY CONTROL, AND TASK CONTROL , 1994 .

[70]  Richard D. Johnson,et al.  A theoretical model of differential social attributions toward computing technology: when the metaphor becomes the model , 2000, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[71]  James E. Hunton,et al.  Effects of User Participation in Systems Development: A Longitudinal Field Experiment , 1997, MIS Q..

[72]  H. Kelley Causal schemata and the attribution process , 1972 .

[73]  Robert S. Lee SOCIAL ATTITUDES AND THE COMPUTER REVOLUTION , 1970 .

[74]  Deborah Compeau,et al.  Application of Social Cognitive Theory to Training for Computer Skills , 1995, Inf. Syst. Res..

[75]  James C. Lester,et al.  The persona effect: affective impact of animated pedagogical agents , 1997, CHI.

[76]  R. M. Midkiff,et al.  An empirical examination of the integration of causal attribution and social learning theories in achievement situations , 1991 .

[77]  Henri Barki,et al.  Measuring User Participation, User Involvement, and User Attitude , 1994, MIS Q..

[78]  Rolph E. Anderson,et al.  Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings , 1979 .

[79]  Akikazu Takeuchi,et al.  Situated facial displays: towards social interaction , 1995, CHI '95.

[80]  M. Coovert,et al.  Locus of Control as a Predictor of Users' Attitude toward Computers , 1980 .

[81]  M. Richards,et al.  Temperament: Early developing personality traits , 1986 .

[82]  C. Nass,et al.  Voices, boxes, and sources of messages: Computers and social actors. , 1993 .