Uncertainty in Seismic Capacity of Masonry Buildings

Seismic assessment of masonry structures is plagued by both inherent randomness and model uncertainty. The former is referred to as aleatory uncertainty, the latter as epistemic uncertainty because it depends on the knowledge level. Pioneering studies on reinforced concrete buildings have revealed a significant influence of modeling parameters on seismic vulnerability. However, confidence in mechanical properties of existing masonry buildings is much lower than in the case of reinforcing steel and concrete. This paper is aimed at assessing whether and how uncertainty propagates from material properties to seismic capacity of an entire masonry structure. A typical two-story unreinforced masonry building is analyzed. Based on previous statistical characterization of mechanical properties of existing masonry types, the following random variables have been considered in this study: unit weight, uniaxial compressive strength, shear strength at zero confining stress, Young’s modulus, shear modulus, and available ductility in shear. Probability density functions were implemented to generate a significant number of realizations and static pushover analysis of the case-study building was performed for each vector of realizations, load combination and lateral load pattern. Analysis results show a large dispersion in displacement capacity and lower dispersion in spectral acceleration capacity. This can directly affect decision-making because both design and retrofit solutions depend on seismic capacity predictions. Therefore, engineering judgment should always be used when assessing structural safety of existing masonry constructions against design earthquakes, based on a series of seismic analyses under uncertain parameters.

[1]  T. P. Tassios,et al.  Seismic engineering of monuments , 2010 .

[2]  Dimitrios Vamvatsikos,et al.  Incremental dynamic analysis , 2002 .

[3]  Dimitrios Vamvatsikos,et al.  Direct estimation of the seismic demand and capacity of oscillators with multi‐linear static pushovers through IDA , 2006 .

[4]  Reuven Y. Rubinstein,et al.  Simulation and the Monte Carlo method , 1981, Wiley series in probability and mathematical statistics.

[5]  Michael Havbro Faber,et al.  On the Treatment of Uncertainties and Probabilities in Engineering Decision Analysis , 2005 .

[6]  Dimitrios Vamvatsikos,et al.  Fast performance uncertainty estimation via pushover and approximate IDA , 2009 .

[7]  James L. Beck,et al.  Sensitivity of Building Loss Estimates to Major Uncertain Variables , 2002 .

[8]  L. Ibarra Global collapse of frame structures under seismic excitations , 2003 .

[9]  Jack W. Baker,et al.  Uncertainty propagation in probabilistic seismic loss estimation , 2008 .

[10]  Keith Porter,et al.  An Overview of PEER's Performance-Based Earthquake Engineering Methodology , 2003 .

[11]  Tae-Hyung Lee,et al.  Seismic demand sensitivity of reinforced concrete shear‐wall building using FOSM method , 2005 .

[12]  Clotaire Michel,et al.  Fragility Functions for Seismic Risk in Regions with Moderate Seismicity , 2010 .

[13]  N. Augenti,et al.  Constitutive modelling of tuff masonry in direct shear , 2011 .

[14]  C. Arya Eurocode 6: Design of masonry structures , 2009 .

[15]  24 .-Some Experimental Results on the Strength of Brick Masonry Walls , 2022 .

[16]  A. Kiureghian,et al.  Aleatory or epistemic? Does it matter? , 2009 .

[17]  N. Augenti,et al.  Constitutive Models for Tuff Masonry under Uniaxial Compression , 2010 .

[18]  Peter Fajfar,et al.  A practice‐oriented estimation of the failure probability of building structures , 2012 .

[19]  Nicola Augenti,et al.  Seismic capacity of irregular unreinforced masonry walls with openings , 2013 .

[20]  Claudio Amadio,et al.  Non‐linear seismic analysis and vulnerability evaluation of a masonry building by means of the SAP2000 V.10 code , 2008 .

[21]  Jack W. Baker,et al.  Incorporating modeling uncertainties in the assessment of seismic collapse risk of buildings , 2009 .