Analysis of colorectal cancer occurrence during surveillance colonoscopy in the dietary Polyp Prevention Trial.

BACKGROUND Interval colorectal cancer (CRC) occasionally is detected in patients who have recently undergone colonoscopy. Systematic evaluation of CRC detected after colonoscopy could identify ways to improve the quality and the outcome of colonoscopy. METHODS This study examined cancer diagnoses in the course of the dietary Polyp Prevention Trial, a randomized study of a dietary intervention on recurrence of adenomatous polyps. An algorithm was developed to classify each cancer into one of 4 etiologies: (1) incomplete removal (cancer at the site of previous adenoma), (2) failed biopsy detection (cancer in an area of suspected neoplasia with negative biopsy specimens), (3) missed cancer (large, advanced stage cancer found at a short interval after colonoscopy), or (4) new cancer (small, early stage cancer after a longer time interval). RESULTS Of 2079 patients, 13 had cancer detected over 5810 person years of observation (PYO) (2.2 cases/1000 PYO); 7/13 or 53.8% of patients had either a potentially "avoidable" cancer or one detectable at an earlier time interval because of incomplete removal (4/13) or missed cancer (3/13). CONCLUSIONS Interval cancer occurs despite colonoscopy. Improved quality of colonoscopy may have reduced cancer prevalence or resulted in earlier cancer detection in over 50% of prevalent cancers in the dietary Polyp Prevention Trial.

[1]  L M Schuman,et al.  The effect of fecal occult-blood screening on the incidence of colorectal cancer. , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.

[2]  C. Mulrow,et al.  Colorectal cancer screening: clinical guidelines and rationale. , 1997, Gastroenterology.

[3]  D. Rex,et al.  Relative sensitivity of colonoscopy and barium enema for detection of colorectal cancer in clinical practice. , 1997, Gastroenterology.

[4]  S. Landas,et al.  Colonic tattooing with India ink: benefits, risks, and alternatives. , 1996, The American journal of gastroenterology.

[5]  Douglas K. Rex,et al.  Quality in the technical performance of colonoscopy and the continuous quality improvement process for colonoscopy: Recommendations of the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer , 2002 .

[6]  T. Smyrk,et al.  Surveillance in Lynch syndrome: how aggressive? , 1994, The American journal of gastroenterology.

[7]  I. Khubchandani,et al.  Colorectal cancer after surveillance colonoscopy , 1999, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[8]  R. Schoen Surveillance after positive and negative colonoscopy examinations: issues, yields, and use. , 2003 .

[9]  J Cuzick,et al.  Long-term risk of colorectal cancer after excision of rectosigmoid adenomas. , 1992, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  A. Neugut,et al.  Reliability in the classification of advanced colorectal adenomas. , 2002, Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology.

[11]  O. Cummings,et al.  Accuracy of pathologic interpretation of colorectal polyps by general pathologists in community practice. , 1999, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[12]  John Baron,et al.  The colonoscopic miss rate and true one-year recurrence of colorectal neoplastic polyps , 1999, American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[13]  P. Pickhardt,et al.  Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  O. Kronborg,et al.  The Funen Adenoma Follow-up Study. Incidence and death from colorectal carcinoma in an adenoma surveillance program. , 1993, Scandinavian journal of gastroenterology.

[15]  D. McGee,et al.  Prospective study of the frequency and size distribution of polyps missed by colonoscopy. , 1990, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[16]  J. Marshall,et al.  Photodocumentation of total colonoscopy: how successful are endoscopists? Do reviewers agree? , 1995, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[17]  J. Weissfeld,et al.  Lack of effect of a low-fat, high-fiber diet on the recurrence of colorectal adenomas. Polyp Prevention Trial Study Group. , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.

[18]  D. Rex,et al.  Failure of colonoscopy to detect colorectal cancer: evaluation of 47 cases in 20 hospitals. , 1997, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[19]  Richard I. Rothstein,et al.  The colonoscopic miss rate and true one-year recurrence of colorectal neoplastic polyps , 1999 .

[20]  D. Rex,et al.  Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomas determined by back-to-back colonoscopies. , 1997, Gastroenterology.

[21]  D. Rex,et al.  Still photography versus videotaping for documentation of cecal intubation: a prospective study. , 2000, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[22]  P. Sistonen,et al.  Screening reduces colorectal cancer rate in families with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. , 1995, Gastroenterology.

[23]  A. Zauber,et al.  Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. , 1993 .