Supporting self-regulated learning in computer-based learning environments: systematic review of effects of scaffolding in the domain of science education

Despite the widespread assumption that students require scaffolding support for self-regulated learning (SRL) processes in computer-based learning environments (CBLEs), there is little clarity as to which types of scaffolds are most effective. This study offers a literature review covering the various scaffolds that support SRL processes in the domain of science education. Effective scaffolds are categorized and discussed according to the different areas and phases of SRL. The results reveal that most studies on scaffolding processes focus on cognition, whereas few focus on the non-cognitive areas of SRL. In the field of cognition, prompts appear to be the most effective scaffolds, especially for processes during the control phase. This review also shows that studies have paid little attention to scaffold designs, learner characteristics, or various task characteristics, despite the fact that these variables have been found to have a significant influence. We conclude with the implications of our results on future design and research in the field of SRL using CBLEs. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

[1]  Kent J. Crippen,et al.  The impact of web-based worked examples and self-explanation on performance, problem solving, and self-efficacy , 2007, Comput. Educ..

[2]  D. Leutner,et al.  Is it Merely a Question of “What” to Prompt or Also “When” to Prompt? , 2009 .

[3]  Geraldine Clarebout,et al.  The relationships between learner variables, tool-usage behaviour and performance , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[4]  B. Zimmerman.  Theories of Self-Regulated Learning and Academic Achievement: An Overview and Analysis , 2001 .

[5]  R. Azevedo,et al.  Scaffolding Self-regulated Learning and Metacognition – Implications for the Design of Computer-based Scaffolds , 2005 .

[6]  Geraldine Clarebout,et al.  Tool use in computer-based learning environments: towards a research framework , 2006, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[7]  Michael J. Hannafin,et al.  Scaffolding in technology-enhanced learning environments , 2007, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[8]  Kent J. Crippen,et al.  The effects of feedback protocol on self-regulated learning in a web-based worked example learning environment , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[9]  Susan Pedersen,et al.  Scaffolding middle school students’ content knowledge and ill-structured problem solving in a problem-based hypermedia learning environment , 2010 .

[10]  Michael J. Hannafin,et al.  Cognitive Tools for Open-Ended Learning Environments: Theoretical and Implementation Perspectives. , 1998 .

[11]  Krista Glazewski,et al.  A scaffolding framework to support the construction of evidence-based arguments among middle school students , 2008 .

[12]  Jörg Zumbach,et al.  The role of graphical and text based argumentation tools in hypermedia learning , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[13]  Roger Azevedo,et al.  Adaptive Human Scaffolding Facilitates Adolescents’ Self-regulated Learning with Hypermedia , 2005 .

[14]  Barbara L. Grabowski,et al.  Improving self-regulation, learning strategy use, and achievement with metacognitive feedback , 2010 .

[15]  Rainer Bromme,et al.  Not everybody needs help to seek help: Surprising effects of metacognitive instructions to foster help-seeking in an online-learning environment , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[16]  James C. Lester,et al.  The Case for Social Agency in Computer-Based Teaching: Do Students Learn More Deeply When They Interact With Animated Pedagogical Agents? , 2001 .

[17]  Andrew T. Lumpe,et al.  The Information Seeking Strategies of High School Science Students , 2002 .

[18]  Xun Ge,et al.  Prompting in Web-Based Environments: Supporting Self-Monitoring and Problem Solving Skills in College Students , 2008 .

[19]  Cor J. M. Suhre,et al.  The effect of the timing of instructional support in a computer-supported problem-solving program for students in secondary physics education , 2008, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[20]  Andrew T. Lumpe,et al.  Student Use of Scaffolding Software: Relationships with Motivation and Conceptual Understanding , 2008 .

[21]  K. Steffens.  Self-regulation and computer based learning , 2001 .

[22]  M. Petticrew,et al.  Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide , 2005 .

[23]  Charlotte Dignath,et al.  How can primary school students learn self-regulated learning strategies most effectively? A meta-analysis on self-regulation training programmes , 2008 .

[24]  Lai Jiang.  Instructional Effectiveness of Scaffolds: Roles of Learner Variables , 2010 .

[25]  Susanne Narciss,et al.  Promoting self-regulated learning in web-based learning environments , 2007, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[26]  Amy M. Shapiro,et al.  Hypermedia design as learner scaffolding , 2008 .

[27]  Nada Dabbagh,et al.  Using Web-based Pedagogical Tools as Scaffolds for Self-regulated Learning , 2005 .

[28]  Janet Mannheimer Zydney.  The effect of multiple scaffolding tools on students' understanding, consideration of different perspectives, and misconceptions of a complex problem , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[29]  Kallen E. Tsikalas,et al.  Can Computer-Based Learning Environments (CBLEs) Be Used as Self-Regulatory Tools to Enhance Learning? , 2005 .

[30]  Claudia Nerdel,et al.  The effects of instructional support and learner interests when learning using computer simulations , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[31]  Roger Azevedo,et al.  Does adaptive scaffolding facilitate students ability to regulate their learning with hypermedia? q , 2004 .

[32]  Peg A Ertmer,et al.  Open Learning Environments, Foundations, Methods, and Models , 2012 .

[33]  R. Azevedo.  Using Hypermedia as a Metacognitive Tool for Enhancing Student Learning? The Role of Self-Regulated Learning , 2005 .

[34]  Matthew L. Bernacki,et al.  Self-Regulated Learning and Technology-Enhanced Learning Environments: An Opportunity-Propensity Analysis , 2011 .

[35]  Yao-Ting Sung,et al.  Effects of learning support in simulation-based physics learning , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[36]  Susan Pedersen,et al.  Advancing young adolescents' hypothesis-development performance in a computer-supported and problem-based learning environment , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[37]  Thomas Brush,et al.  Scaffolding critical reasoning about history and social issues in multimedia-supported learning environments , 2002 .

[38]  B. Zimmerman.  A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning. , 1989 .

[39]  Stephen M. Fiore,et al.  Scaffolding cognitive and metacognitive processes in low verbal ability learners: Use of diagrams in computer-based training environments , 2002 .

[40]  Roger Azevedo,et al.  Teaching and Learning in Technology-Rich Environments , 2006 .

[41]  James D. Klein,et al.  The Impact of Scaffolding and Student Achievement Levels in a Problem-based Learning Environment , 2007 .

[42]  Roy D. Pea,et al.  The Social and Technological Dimensions of Scaffolding and Related Theoretical Concepts for Learning, Education, and Human Activity , 2004, The Journal of the Learning Sciences.

[43]  Alexander Renkl,et al.  Are high-coherent concept maps better for prior knowledge activation? Differential effects of concept mapping tasks on high school vs. university students , 2008, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[44]  Maurine A. Fry,et al.  Trait-Task interaction in intra- and intermodal matching of auditory and visual trigrams☆ , 1979 .

[45]  S. Puntambekar,et al.  Tools for Scaffolding Students in a Complex Learning Environment: What Have We Gained and What Have We Missed? , 2005 .

[46]  Roger Azevedo,et al.  Advances in scaffolding learning with hypertext and hypermedia: theoretical, empirical, and design issues , 2008 .

[47]  Michael J. Hannafin,et al.  Scaffolding problem solving in technology-enhanced learning environments (TELEs): Bridging research and theory with practice , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[48]  K. Scheiter,et al.  Learner Control in Hypermedia Environments , 2007 .

[49]  Roger Azevedo,et al.  Exploring the fluctuation of motivation and use of self-regulatory processes during learning with hypermedia , 2008 .

[50]  T. Jong,et al.  Software scaffolds to promote regulation during scientific inquiry learning , 2007 .

[51]  Jennifer Masters,et al.  Rethinking scaffolding in the information age , 2007, Comput. Educ..

[52]  Fielding I. Winters,et al.  Self-Regulation of Learning within Computer-based Learning Environments: A Critical Analysis , 2008 .

[53]  Michael J. Hannafin,et al.  Teaching and learning in digital environments: The resurgence of resource-based learning , 2001 .

[54]  Yiping Lou,et al.  Web-Based Learning , 2004 .

[55]  Allyson F. Hadwin,et al.  CoNoteS2: A Software Tool for Promoting Self-Regulation , 2001 .

[56]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  SEEK Web tutor: fostering a critical stance while exploring the causes of volcanic eruption , 2007 .

[57]  Gautam Biswas,et al.  LEARNING BY TEACHING: A NEW AGENT PARADIGM FOR EDUCATIONAL SOFTWARE , 2005, Appl. Artif. Intell..

[58]  B. Zimmerman,et al.  Motivation An Essential Dimension of Self-Regulated Learning , 2012 .

[59]  A. Renkl,et al.  Do learning protocols support learning strategies and outcomes? The role of cognitive and metacognitive prompts , 2007 .

[60]  Elizabeth A. Davis,et al.  Scaffolding students' knowledge integration: prompts for reflection in KIE , 2000 .

[61]  Janet Mannheimer Zydney,et al.  Cognitive Tools for Scaffolding Students Defining an Ill-Structured Problem , 2008 .

[62]  Gregory Schraw,et al.  The use of computer-based environments for understanding and improving self-regulation , 2007 .

[63]  J. C. Winnips.  Support of active-self-reliant learning via the WWW by means of cue scaffolding. , 2000 .

[64]  P. Pintrich.  The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. , 2000 .

[65]  Ton de Jong,et al.  Trends and issues of regulative support use during inquiry learning: Patterns from three studies , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[66]  Ruomeng Zhao,et al.  Effects of online note taking formats and self-monitoring prompts on learning from online text: Usin , 2011 .

[67]  Katharina Scheiter,et al.  Information comparisons in example-based hypermedia environments: supporting learners with processing prompts and an interactive comparison tool , 2008 .