Computer screen designs: Viewer judgments

This study examined viewer judgments about the readability and studyability of two sets of computer screens: a set of model displays and a set of real screens copied from CAI programs. The purpose was to identify constructs that could guide the design of computer screens used to display information in computer-assisted instruction, hypermedia, or on-line help applications. It also searched for any relationships among viewer preference and viewer field articulation (field-dependence/independence), conceptual style (relational/analytical), and gender. Findings based on multidimensional scaling techniques confirmed and further defined the existence of evaluative constructs based on visual complexity and organization. No generalizable effects for field articulation, conceptual style, or gender differences were found.

[1]  Arthur T. Turnbull,et al.  The graphics of communication : typography, layout, design , 1968 .

[2]  James Hartley,et al.  Designing instructional text , 1978 .

[3]  Robert H. W. Waller.  Graphic aspects of complex texts: Typography as macropunctuation , 1980 .

[4]  R. Scott Grabinger.  Screen layout design: Research into the overall appearance of the screen☆ , 1989 .

[5]  Rolph E. Anderson,et al.  Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings , 1979 .

[6]  Gary R. Morrison,et al.  In search of a happy medium in instructional technology research: Issues concerning external validity, media replications, and learner control , 1989 .

[7]  Paul E. Green,et al.  On the Design of Choice Experiments Involving Multifactor Alternatives , 1974 .

[8]  N. Nie.  SPSS-X User's Guide , 1983 .

[9]  Linda Reynolds,et al.  Progress in Documentation: Legibility studies: their Relevance to Present‐Day Documentation Methods , 1979, J. Documentation.

[10]  M. Tinker.  Legibility of print , 1963 .

[11]  S. M. Holzer,et al.  Book Reviews : SYSTEM DYNAMICS Katsuhiko Ogata Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1978 , 1980 .

[12]  Malcolm L. Fleming,et al.  Instructional Message Design: Principles from the Behavioral and Cognitive Sciences , 1993 .

[13]  Lillian. Garrett.  Visual Design: A Problem-Solving Approach , 1975 .

[14]  Bud Donahue.  The Language of Layout , 1978 .

[15]  Joseph L. Zinnes,et al.  Theory and Methods of Scaling. , 1958 .

[16]  I. Sigel,et al.  Psychological significance of styles of conceptualization. , 1963, Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development.

[17]  Forrest W. Young,et al.  Introduction to Multidimensional Scaling: Theory, Methods, and Applications , 1981 .

[18]  R. Scott Grabinger.  CRT Text Design: Psychological Attributes Underlying the Evaluation of Models of CRT Text Displays. , 1984 .

[19]  Douglas Amedeo,et al.  CRT Text layout: perceptions of viewers , 1988 .

[20]  I. Spence,et al.  Single subject incomplete designs for nonmetric multidimensional scaling , 1974 .

[21]  Gary R. Morrison.  Reconsidering CBI screen design: Alternatives to text-based designs , 1989 .

[22]  R. Scott Grabinger,et al.  Relationships among Test Format Variables in Computer-Generated Text. , 1986 .

[23]  Miles A. Tinker,et al.  Teaching Elementary Reading , 1975 .

[24]  L. W. Denton,et al.  Publication design , 1978 .

[25]  Ruth Colvin Bovy.  Successful instructional methods: A cognitive information processing approach , 1981 .

[26]  Rolph E. Anderson,et al.  Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings , 1979 .

[27]  Earl R. Misanchuk.  Preparing Instructional Text: Document Design Using Desktop Publishing , 1992 .

[28]  R. Rummel.  Applied Factor Analysis , 1970 .

[29]  Rolf F. Rehe.  Typography : how to make it most legible , 1981 .