Collisions and perception

Level of Detail (LOD) techniques for real-time rendering and related perceptual issues have received a lot of attention in recent years. Researchers have also begun to look at the issue of perceptually adaptive techniques for plausible physical simulations. In this article, we are particularly interested in the problem of realistic collision simulation in scenes where large numbers of objects are colliding and processing must occur in real-time. An interruptible and therefore degradable collision-handling mechanism is used and the perceptual impact of this degradation is explored. We look for ways in which we can optimize the realism of such simulations and describe a series of psychophysical experiments that investigate different factors affecting collision perception, including eccentricity, separation, distractors, causality, and accuracy of physical response. Finally, strategies for incorporating these factors into a perceptually adaptive real-time simulation of large numbers of visually similar objects are presented.

[1]  F. W. Weymouth Visual sensory units and the minimal angle of resolution. , 1958, American journal of ophthalmology.

[2]  R. C. Oldfield THE PERCEPTION OF CAUSALITY , 1963 .

[3]  A. Michotte The perception of causality , 1963 .

[4]  P. O. Bishop,et al.  Spatial vision. , 1971, Annual review of psychology.

[5]  O. Braddick A short-range process in apparent motion. , 1974, Vision research.

[6]  E. Switkes,et al.  Deoxyglucose analysis of retinotopic organization in primate striate cortex. , 1982, Science.

[7]  J. Clement Students’ preconceptions in introductory mechanics , 1982 .

[8]  A. Treisman Perceptual grouping and attention in visual search for features and for objects. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[9]  A. Leslie,et al.  Do six-month-old infants perceive causality? , 1987, Cognition.

[10]  H. Furth Object permanence in five-month-old infants. , 1987, Cognition.

[11]  D. Proffitt,et al.  Understanding natural dynamics. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[12]  D R Proffitt,et al.  Understanding collision dynamics. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[13]  Carlo H. Séquin,et al.  Adaptive display algorithm for interactive frame rates during visualization of complex virtual environments , 1993, SIGGRAPH.

[14]  H Strasburger,et al.  Cortical Magnification Theory Fails to Predict Visual Recognition , 1994, The European journal of neuroscience.

[15]  J Saarinen,et al.  Visual Search for Global and Local Stimulus Features , 1994, Perception.

[16]  Philip M. Hubbard,et al.  Collision Detection for Interactive Graphics Applications , 1995, IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph..

[17]  John F. Hughes,et al.  Plausible motion simulation for computer graphics animation , 1996 .

[18]  Hideyuki Tamura,et al.  Gaze-directed adaptive rendering for interacting with virtual space , 1996, Proceedings of the IEEE 1996 Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium.

[19]  Brian Mirtich,et al.  Impulse-based dynamic simulation of rigid body systems , 1996 .

[20]  David A. Forsyth,et al.  View-dependent culling of dynamic systems in virtual environments , 1997, SI3D.

[21]  Martin Reddy,et al.  Perceptually modulated level of detail for virtual environments , 1997 .

[22]  Mark A. Duchaineau,et al.  ROAMing terrain: real-time optimally adapting meshes , 1997 .

[23]  Jessica K. Hodgins,et al.  Simulation Levels of Detail for Real-time Animation , 1997, Graphics Interface.

[24]  Benjamin Watson,et al.  Managing level of detail through peripheral degradation: effects on search performance with a head-mounted display , 1997, TCHI.

[25]  MARISA CARRASCO,et al.  Cortical Magnification Neutralizes the Eccentricity Effect in Visual Search , 1997, Vision Research.

[26]  David E. Sigeti,et al.  ROAMing terrain: Real-time Optimally Adapting Meshes , 1997, Proceedings. Visualization '97 (Cat. No. 97CB36155).

[27]  Jessica K. Hodgins,et al.  Perception of Human Motion With Different Geometric Models , 1998, IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph..

[28]  Carol O'Sullivan,et al.  A Model of Collision Perception for Real-Time Animation , 1999, Computer Animation and Simulation.

[29]  John Dingliana,et al.  Graceful Degradation of Collision Handling in Physically Based Animation , 2000, Comput. Graph. Forum.

[30]  Brian Mirtich,et al.  Timewarp rigid body simulation , 2000, SIGGRAPH.

[31]  David A. Forsyth,et al.  Sampling plausible solutions to multi-body constraint problems , 2000, SIGGRAPH.

[32]  Dinesh K. Pai,et al.  FoleyAutomatic: physically-based sound effects for interactive simulation and animation , 2001, SIGGRAPH.

[33]  Brian E. Smits,et al.  Use of interreflection and shadow for surface contact , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[34]  D. Luebke,et al.  Perceptually Driven Simplification , 2001 .

[35]  Benjamin Watson,et al.  Measuring and predicting visual fidelity , 2001, SIGGRAPH.

[36]  Mohieddine Jelali,et al.  Physically Based Modelling , 2003 .