Advances in Molecular Imaging with Ultrasound

Ultrasound imaging has long demonstrated utility in the study and measurement of anatomic features and noninvasive observation of blood flow. Within the last decade, advances in molecular biology and contrast agents have allowed researchers to use ultrasound to detect changes in the expression of molecular markers on the vascular endothelium and other intravascular targets. This new technology, referred to as ultrasonic molecular imaging, is still in its infancy. However, in preclinical studies, ultrasonic molecular imaging has shown promise in assessing angiogenesis, inflammation, and thrombus. In this review, we discuss recent advances in microbubble-type contrast agent development, ultrasound technology, and signal processing strategies that have the potential to substantially improve the capabilities and utility of ultrasonic molecular imaging.

[1]  F. Foster,et al.  A method for differentiating targeted microbubbles in real time using subharmonic micro-ultrasound and interframe filtering. , 2009, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[2]  Jonathan R. Lindner,et al.  Molecular and Cellular Imaging with Targeted Contrast Ultrasound , 2005, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[3]  George M. Whitesides,et al.  Formation of monodisperse bubbles in a microfluidic flow-focusing device , 2004 .

[4]  Eleanor Stride,et al.  Dynamics of bubble formation in highly viscous liquids. , 2008, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[5]  Nico de Jong,et al.  Acoustic characterization of single ultrasound contrast agent microbubbles. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  S. Bunting,et al.  Molecular Imaging of the Initial Inflammatory Response in Atherosclerosis: Implications for Early Detection of Disease , 2010, Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology.

[7]  Flemming Forsberg,et al.  Ultrasound Contrast Agents: Basic Principles and Clinical Applications , 2001 .

[8]  Douglas A Christensen,et al.  Drug-loaded nano/microbubbles for combining ultrasonography and targeted chemotherapy. , 2008, Ultrasonics.

[9]  S. Kaul,et al.  Albunex: a safe and effective commercially produced agent for myocardial contrast echocardiography. , 1989, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[10]  Paul A Dayton,et al.  Targeted imaging using ultrasound , 2002, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[11]  A. Klibanov,et al.  Ultrasound triggered image-guided drug delivery. , 2009, European journal of radiology.

[12]  Katherine W. Ferrara,et al.  Lipid-Shelled Vehicles: Engineering for Ultrasound Molecular Imaging and Drug Delivery , 2009 .

[13]  A. Klibanov,et al.  Detection of Individual Microbubbles of Ultrasound Contrast Agents: Imaging of Free-Floating and Targeted Bubbles , 2004, Investigative radiology.

[14]  F. Foster,et al.  Nonlinear contrast agent imaging with a linear array based micro-ultrasound system , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium.

[15]  Samuel A Wickline,et al.  Molecular imaging with targeted perfluorocarbon nanoparticles: quantification of the concentration dependence of contrast enhancement for binding to sparse cellular epitopes. , 2007, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[16]  Paul A Dayton,et al.  A stimulus-responsive contrast agent for ultrasound molecular imaging. , 2008, Biomaterials.

[17]  F Forsberg,et al.  Subharmonic imaging of contrast agents. , 2000, Ultrasonics.

[18]  Alexander L. Klibanov,et al.  Microbubbles in ultrasound-triggered drug and gene delivery. , 2008, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[19]  Samuel A Wickline,et al.  Targeted ultrasonic contrast agents for molecular imaging and therapy. , 2001, Current problems in cardiology.

[20]  Nico de Jong,et al.  Nonspherical oscillations of ultrasound contrast agent microbubbles. , 2008, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[21]  E. Unger,et al.  Targeted-Microbubble Binding Selectively to GPIIb IIIa Receptors of Platelet Thrombi , 2002, Investigative radiology.

[22]  E Stride,et al.  Preparation of microbubble suspensions by co-axial electrohydrodynamic atomization. , 2007, Medical engineering & physics.

[23]  David D McPherson,et al.  Fibrin targeting of echogenic liposomes with inactivated tissue plasminogen activator. , 2008, Journal of liposome research.

[24]  J. Allen,et al.  Blood contrast enhancement with a novel, non-gaseous nanoparticle contrast agent. , 2002, Academic radiology.

[25]  W. Krause.  Contrast Agents II , 2002 .

[26]  S. Kaul,et al.  Influence of microbubble surface charge on capillary transit and myocardial contrast enhancement. , 2002, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[27]  F Forsberg,et al.  Contrast enhanced vascular three-dimensional ultrasound imaging. , 2002, Ultrasonics.

[28]  Paul A Dayton,et al.  On-chip generation of microbubbles as a practical technology for manufacturing contrast agents for ultrasonic imaging. , 2007, Lab on a chip.

[29]  F. Foster,et al.  Radiation force-enhanced targeted imaging and near real-time molecular imaging using a dual-frequency high-resolution transducer: In-vitro and in-vivo results , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium.

[30]  Mark Borden,et al.  Ultrasound microbubble contrast agents: fundamentals and application to gene and drug delivery. , 2007, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[31]  P. Dayton,et al.  Acoustic signatures of submicron contrast agents , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[32]  Sanjiv S Gambhir,et al.  Targeted microbubbles for imaging tumor angiogenesis: assessment of whole-body biodistribution with dynamic micro-PET in mice. , 2008, Radiology.

[33]  E. Unger,et al.  In vitro studies of a new thrombus-specific ultrasound contrast agent. , 1998, The American journal of cardiology.

[34]  E. Quaia.  Contrast media in ultrasonography : basic principles and clinical applications , 2005 .

[35]  Emilio Quaia,et al.  Contrast Media in Ultrasonography , 2005 .

[36]  N de Jong,et al.  Ultrasound contrast imaging: current and new potential methods. , 2000, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[37]  P. Dayton,et al.  Resonance frequencies of lipid-shelled microbubbles in the regime of nonlinear oscillations. , 2009, Ultrasonics.

[38]  John A Hossack,et al.  Enhanced targeting of ultrasound contrast agents using acoustic radiation force. , 2007, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[39]  P Aspelin,et al.  Bolus compared with continuous infusion of microbubble contrast agent using real-time contrast harmonic imaging ultrasound in breast tumors , 2009, Acta radiologica.

[40]  Nico de Jong,et al.  Basic Acoustic Properties of Microbubbles , 2002, Echocardiography.

[41]  Flordeliza S Villanueva,et al.  Molecular imaging of cardiovascular disease using ultrasound , 2008, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[42]  P. Burns,et al.  Nonlinear imaging. , 2000, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[43]  R. Mattrey.  The potential role of perfluorochemicals (PFCs) in diagnostic imaging. , 1994, Artificial cells, blood substitutes, and immobilization biotechnology.

[44]  J. Pikkemaat,et al.  Preparation of monodisperse polymer particles and capsules by ink-jet printing , 2006 .

[45]  E. Dinjus,et al.  The potential of a new stable ultrasound contrast agent for site-specific targeting. An in vitro experiment. , 2006, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[46]  D. Sahn,et al.  Ultrasound-mediated destruction of contrast agents. Effect of ultrasound intensity, exposure, and frequency. , 1997, Investigative radiology.

[47]  E. Wisner,et al.  Optical and acoustical interrogation of submicron contrast agents , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[48]  Sanjiv S Gambhir,et al.  Dual-targeted contrast agent for US assessment of tumor angiogenesis in vivo. , 2008, Radiology.

[49]  K W Ferrara,et al.  Selective imaging of adherent targeted ultrasound contrast agents , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[50]  D. McPherson,et al.  Fibrin targeting of tissue plasminogen activator-loaded echogenic liposomes , 2007, Journal of drug targeting.

[51]  P. Dayton,et al.  Threshold of fragmentation for ultrasonic contrast agents. , 2001, Journal of biomedical optics.

[52]  William R Wagner,et al.  Ultrasonic imaging of tumor angiogenesis using contrast microbubbles targeted via the tumor-binding peptide arginine-arginine-leucine. , 2005, Cancer research.

[53]  Klaus Ley,et al.  Deformable gas-filled microbubbles targeted to P-selectin. , 2006, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[54]  P. Dayton,et al.  Acoustic radiation force in vivo: a mechanism to assist targeting of microbubbles. , 1999, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[55]  Paul A Dayton,et al.  Maintaining monodispersity in a microbubble population formed by flow-focusing. , 2008, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[56]  A. Lee,et al.  Acoustic characterization of individual monodisperse contrast agents with an optical-acoustical system , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium.

[57]  D. Khismatullin.  Resonance frequency of microbubbles: effect of viscosity. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[58]  J. Elion,et al.  Left heart opacification with peripheral venous injection of a new saccharide echo contrast agent in dogs. , 1989, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[59]  M. Tweedle.  Peptide-targeted diagnostics and radiotherapeutics. , 2009, Accounts of chemical research.

[60]  J. Kuszak,et al.  Development of inherently echogenic liposomes as an ultrasonic contrast agent. , 1996, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[61]  Jameel A Feshitan,et al.  Microbubble size isolation by differential centrifugation. , 2009, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[62]  Alexander L. Klibanov,et al.  Ultrasound Contrast Agents: Development of the Field and Current Status , 2002 .

[63]  Paul A Dayton,et al.  Tailoring the Size Distribution of Ultrasound Contrast Agents: Possible Method for Improving Sensitivity in Molecular Imaging , 2007, Molecular imaging.

[64]  Paul A Dayton,et al.  Asymmetric oscillation of adherent targeted ultrasound contrast agents. , 2005, Applied physics letters.

[65]  Jonathan R Lindner,et al.  Contrast ultrasound molecular imaging of inflammation in cardiovascular disease. , 2009, Cardiovascular research.

[66]  T. Gjøen,et al.  Biodistributions of air-filled albumin microspheres in rats and pigs. , 1994, The Biochemical journal.

[67]  F. T. ten Cate,et al.  Adverse reactions after the use of sulphur hexafluoride (SonoVue) echo contrast agent. , 2009, Journal of cardiovascular medicine.

[68]  P. Dayton,et al.  Effect of coupled oscillations on microbubble behavior. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[69]  Nico de Jong,et al.  "Compression-only" behavior of phospholipid-coated contrast bubbles. , 2007, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[70]  Eleanor Stride,et al.  Physical Principles of Microbubbles for Ultrasound Imaging and Therapy , 2009, Cerebrovascular Diseases.

[71]  P. Phillips,et al.  Contrast pulse sequences (CPS): imaging nonlinear microbubbles , 2001, 2001 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium. Proceedings. An International Symposium (Cat. No.01CH37263).

[72]  John A Hossack,et al.  Dual frequency method for simultaneous translation and real-time imaging of ultrasound contrast agents within large blood vessels. , 2009, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[73]  P. Dayton,et al.  Mechanisms of contrast agent destruction , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[74]  P. Wagner,et al.  Anaphylactoid response to Optison(R) and its effects on pulmonary function in two dogs. , 2004, The Journal of veterinary medical science.

[75]  D S Segar,et al.  Improved left ventricular endocardial border delineation and opacification with OPTISON (FS069), a new echocardiographic contrast agent. Results of a phase III Multicenter Trial. , 1998, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[76]  K. Ley,et al.  Dual targeting improves microbubble contrast agent adhesion to VCAM-1 and P-selectin under flow. , 2009, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[77]  N. Weissman,et al.  Overview of the 2008 Food and Drug Administration Advisory Committee on Safety Considerations in the Development of Ultrasound Contrast Agents , 2009, Circulation.

[78]  S. Homma,et al.  High-frequency ultrasound imaging of size-isolated microbubbles in mice , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium.

[79]  Meng-Xing Tang,et al.  Physical Phenomena Affecting Quantitative Imaging of Ultrasound Contrast Agent , 2009 .

[80]  Paul A Dayton,et al.  Improving Sensitivity in Ultrasound Molecular Imaging by Tailoring Contrast Agent Size Distribution: In Vivo Studies , 2010, Molecular imaging.

[81]  Paul A Dayton,et al.  Ultrasound Radiation Force Modulates Ligand Availability on Targeted Contrast Agents , 2006, Molecular imaging.

[82]  Jonathan R. Lindner,et al.  Noninvasive Assessment of Angiogenesis by Ultrasound and Microbubbles Targeted to &agr;v-Integrins , 2003, Circulation.

[83]  William R Wagner,et al.  Targeted ultrasound contrast agents: in vitro assessment of endothelial dysfunction and multi-targeting to ICAM-1 and sialyl Lewisx. , 2005, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[84]  Paul A. Dayton,et al.  Imaging of angiogenesis using Cadence contrast pulse sequencing and targeted contrast agents. , 2008, Contrast media & molecular imaging.

[85]  Hairong Zheng,et al.  A sensitive ultrasonic imaging method for targeted contrast microbubble detection , 2008, 2008 30th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[86]  Paul A. Dayton,et al.  Microbubble oscillation in tubes with diameters of 12, 25, and 195 microns , 2006 .

[87]  E. Wisner,et al.  Sentinel Node Detection Using Contrast-Enhanced Power Doppler Ultrasound Lymphography , 2003, Investigative radiology.

[88]  Paul A Dayton,et al.  The magnitude of radiation force on ultrasound contrast agents. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[89]  K. Nightingale,et al.  A preliminary evaluation of the effects of primary and secondary radiation forces on acoustic contrast agents , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[90]  S. Acton,et al.  Targeted ultrasound contrast agent for molecular imaging of inflammation in high-shear flow. , 2006, Contrast media & molecular imaging.

[91]  K. Ley,et al.  Ultrasound Assessment of Inflammation and Renal Tissue Injury With Microbubbles Targeted to P-Selectin , 2001, Circulation.

[92]  William R Wagner,et al.  Ultrasound Imaging of Acute Cardiac Transplant Rejection With Microbubbles Targeted to Intercellular Adhesion Molecule-1 , 2003, Circulation.